GTRQRTV-TF-06-02
CLEPA comments on the draft GTR for Quiet Road Transport Vehicles
Source(s)
Date
23 Oct 2014
Status
Subject
Meeting(s)

The European automotive supplier association’s positions on provisions in the draft GTR. Since CLEPA has agreements whereby the association also represents the interests of the Japan Auto Parts Industries Association and the Motor and Equipment Manufacturers Association of the US within WP.29, CLEPA has stressed that these comments reflect only the European CLEPA views.

UNECE server
Excerpts from session reports
REG58-QRTV | Session 1 | 10-11 Dec 2014

8. WBU: Review of WBU position from document REG58-QRTV-01-004WBU Comments on CLEPA-QRTV Report October 2014: WBU named the overall Sound pressure level as the most important item. Other very important factors of the Regulation to come are pitch shifting, the amount of broadband (enabling to recognize vehicle’s speed and its directivity), sound at stationary (50 dB(A) is not seen as an environmental concern) and the abstinence of a pause switch (does it make sense to turn a safety feature off?)

REG58-QRTV | Session 2 | 26-27 Jan 2015

WBU referenced document REG58-QRTV-01-004WBU Comments on CLEPA-QRTV Report October 2014, that was already presented during the 1st meeting in Tokyo and pointed the importance to present the content to both GRB and WP29. WBU expressed the concerns that with the proposed waiving of a sound at stationary and the inclusion of a pause switch to be operated at the discretion of the driver, the pedestian’s safety would be in the hands of the driver rather than of the pedestrian. WBU underlined that a high SPL is one of the most important attributes of AVAS.

The Chair responded that most participants see the SPL as included in the proposed UN Regulation as sufficiently high to be well detectable. The level is derogated from scientific researches. WBU is invited to present further data that underlines the need for a higher SPL.