Proposal to clarify the draft text to align UN R79 with UN R13-H concerning cases where the braking and steering systems have the same energy source. This proposal would clarify and reaffirm that where there is “a failure in the energy supply, the steering system shall have priority”.
51. Referring to GRRF-78-27, the expert from CLEPA, on behalf of CLEPA and OICA, introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2015/37 proposing to align the requirements to be met in case of the steering system and the braking system of a vehicle share the same energy source with those of Regulations Nos. 13 and 13-H. GRRF adopted the proposal as reproduced below:
Insert a new paragraph 5.3.1.6., to read:
| “5.3.1.6. | The requirements for the braking performance in paragraphs 5.3.1.4. and 5.3.1.5. above shall not apply if the braking system is such that in the absence of any energy reserve it is possible with the service brake control to achieve the safety requirement for the secondary braking system mentioned in: |
| (a) Paragraph 2.2. of Regulation No. 13-H, Annex 3 (for M1-, N1-vehicles); (b) Paragraph 2.2. of Regulation No. 13, Annex 4 (for M2-, M3-, N-vehicles).” |
53. GRRF requested the secretariat to submit both adopted proposals to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration at their June 2016 sessions, as Supplement 5 to the 01 series of amendments to Regulation No. 79.
40. At the request of the authors of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2014/19, GRRF agreed to withdraw the document. Instead, the expert from CLEPA introduced GRRF-78-44 supporting GRRF-78-27 on requirements to be met in cases where braking and steering systems have the same energy source. The proposed amendment attempted to clarify and align the wording of this UN Regulation No. 79 with that of UN Regulation No. 13-H. Following the discussion, GRRF agreed to revisit this subject at its February 2015 session on the basis of a revised proposal by CLEPA taking into account the comments received.
| GRRF/2014/19 | |
| GRRF-78-44 | |
| GRRF/2015/37 |