46. Referring to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/17, the expert from Japan, Co-Chair of the IWG on AEBS introduced GRVA-04-38. He noted that para. 6.10 and the Appendix in the working document were in square brackets. The expert from Japan introduced
GRVA-04-39, proposing further amendments to Appendix 2 of Annex 3.

47. The expert from OICA introduced GRVA-04-12 with editorial amendments.

48. The expert from the Russian Federation proposed an editorial correction in para. 7.1.

49. The expert from OICA introduced GRVA-04-11, supporting the provisions in the proposed para. 6.10. for a statistical approach to evaluating AEBS performance on the basis of unsuccessful tests. GRVA decided to reconsider this proposal at its next session. The expert from China informed that their draft national standard included such considerations. He mentioned that his country would consider GRVA’s decision on this point to support harmonization, if timing allows.

50. GRVA adopted the proposal as amended (GRVA-04-51) with the deletion of the proposed para. 6.10, the correction to para. 7.1 and the amendments proposed in GRVA-04-12 and GRVA-04-39. GRVA requested the secretariat to submit it as Supplement 1 to UN Regulation No. [152] to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration and vote at their March 2020 sessions.

Pursuant to discussions during the 9th session of the informal working group on AEBS for M₁/N₁, paragraphs 6.5.2. (pass conditions regarding “car-to-car moving” collision warning) and 6.6.2. (pass conditions regarding the collision warning in the Car to Pedestrian scenario) were deleted given that pass conditions were already defined by the general requirements. For consistency, this proposal would delete the pass conditions under the car-to-car stationary scenario.

46. Referring to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/17, the expert from Japan, Co-Chair of the IWG on AEBS introduced GRVA-04-38. He noted that para. 6.10 and the Appendix in the working document were in square brackets. The expert from Japan introduced
GRVA-04-39, proposing further amendments to Appendix 2 of Annex 3.

47. The expert from OICA introduced GRVA-04-12 with editorial amendments.

48. The expert from the Russian Federation proposed an editorial correction in para. 7.1.

49. The expert from OICA introduced GRVA-04-11, supporting the provisions in the proposed para. 6.10. for a statistical approach to evaluating AEBS performance on the basis of unsuccessful tests. GRVA decided to reconsider this proposal at its next session. The expert from China informed that their draft national standard included such considerations. He mentioned that his country would consider GRVA’s decision on this point to support harmonization, if timing allows.

50. GRVA adopted the proposal as amended (GRVA-04-51) with the deletion of the proposed para. 6.10, the correction to para. 7.1 and the amendments proposed in GRVA-04-12 and GRVA-04-39. GRVA requested the secretariat to submit it as Supplement 1 to UN Regulation No. [152] to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration and vote at their March 2020 sessions.

Presentation in support of the proposals for the 01 series of amendments and for Supplement 1 to UN R152 (respectively, documents GRVA/2019/16 and GRVA/2019/17.

46. Referring to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/17, the expert from Japan, Co-Chair of the IWG on AEBS introduced GRVA-04-38. He noted that para. 6.10 and the Appendix in the working document were in square brackets. The expert from Japan introduced
GRVA-04-39, proposing further amendments to Appendix 2 of Annex 3.

47. The expert from OICA introduced GRVA-04-12 with editorial amendments.

48. The expert from the Russian Federation proposed an editorial correction in para. 7.1.

49. The expert from OICA introduced GRVA-04-11, supporting the provisions in the proposed para. 6.10. for a statistical approach to evaluating AEBS performance on the basis of unsuccessful tests. GRVA decided to reconsider this proposal at its next session. The expert from China informed that their draft national standard included such considerations. He mentioned that his country would consider GRVA’s decision on this point to support harmonization, if timing allows.

50. GRVA adopted the proposal as amended (GRVA-04-51) with the deletion of the proposed para. 6.10, the correction to para. 7.1 and the amendments proposed in GRVA-04-12 and GRVA-04-39. GRVA requested the secretariat to submit it as Supplement 1 to UN Regulation No. [152] to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration and vote at their March 2020 sessions.

54. GRVA noted that GRVA-04-38 also contained information about the challenges to develop provisions for the Car-to-Bicycle scenario. GRVA agreed to request an extension of the mandate of the group until September 2020.

The False Reaction scenarios in Annex 3-Appendix 2 were based on UN R131 (on-highway heavy vehicles) without verification of their applicability to urban light vehicles. Japan has begun research and anticipates proposing changes to the UN R152 scenarios in the near future. This proposal identifies scenarios under study and recommends tolerances for the vehicle and pedestrian dummy placements. Japan also raises concerns over the provision “the AEBS shall not provide a collision warning” in cases where there is no imminent collision risk.

46. Referring to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/17, the expert from Japan, Co-Chair of the IWG on AEBS introduced GRVA-04-38. He noted that para. 6.10 and the Appendix in the working document were in square brackets. The expert from Japan introduced
GRVA-04-39, proposing further amendments to Appendix 2 of Annex 3.

47. The expert from OICA introduced GRVA-04-12 with editorial amendments.

48. The expert from the Russian Federation proposed an editorial correction in para. 7.1.

49. The expert from OICA introduced GRVA-04-11, supporting the provisions in the proposed para. 6.10. for a statistical approach to evaluating AEBS performance on the basis of unsuccessful tests. GRVA decided to reconsider this proposal at its next session. The expert from China informed that their draft national standard included such considerations. He mentioned that his country would consider GRVA’s decision on this point to support harmonization, if timing allows.

50. GRVA adopted the proposal as amended (GRVA-04-51) with the deletion of the proposed para. 6.10, the correction to para. 7.1 and the amendments proposed in GRVA-04-12 and GRVA-04-39. GRVA requested the secretariat to submit it as Supplement 1 to UN Regulation No. [152] to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration and vote at their March 2020 sessions.

46. Referring to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/17, the expert from Japan, Co-Chair of the IWG on AEBS introduced GRVA-04-38. He noted that para. 6.10 and the Appendix in the working document were in square brackets. The expert from Japan introduced
GRVA-04-39, proposing further amendments to Appendix 2 of Annex 3.

47. The expert from OICA introduced GRVA-04-12 with editorial amendments.

48. The expert from the Russian Federation proposed an editorial correction in para. 7.1.

49. The expert from OICA introduced GRVA-04-11, supporting the provisions in the proposed para. 6.10. for a statistical approach to evaluating AEBS performance on the basis of unsuccessful tests. GRVA decided to reconsider this proposal at its next session. The expert from China informed that their draft national standard included such considerations. He mentioned that his country would consider GRVA’s decision on this point to support harmonization, if timing allows.

50. GRVA adopted the proposal as amended (GRVA-04-51) with the deletion of the proposed para. 6.10, the correction to para. 7.1 and the amendments proposed in GRVA-04-12 and GRVA-04-39. GRVA requested the secretariat to submit it as Supplement 1 to UN Regulation No. [152] to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration and vote at their March 2020 sessions.

Proposal from the AEBS informal group to improve and clarify the text of the Regulation.

46. Referring to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/17, the expert from Japan, Co-Chair of the IWG on AEBS introduced GRVA-04-38. He noted that para. 6.10 and the Appendix in the working document were in square brackets. The expert from Japan introduced
GRVA-04-39, proposing further amendments to Appendix 2 of Annex 3.

47. The expert from OICA introduced GRVA-04-12 with editorial amendments.

48. The expert from the Russian Federation proposed an editorial correction in para. 7.1.

49. The expert from OICA introduced GRVA-04-11, supporting the provisions in the proposed para. 6.10. for a statistical approach to evaluating AEBS performance on the basis of unsuccessful tests. GRVA decided to reconsider this proposal at its next session. The expert from China informed that their draft national standard included such considerations. He mentioned that his country would consider GRVA’s decision on this point to support harmonization, if timing allows.

50. GRVA adopted the proposal as amended (GRVA-04-51) with the deletion of the proposed para. 6.10, the correction to para. 7.1 and the amendments proposed in GRVA-04-12 and GRVA-04-39. GRVA requested the secretariat to submit it as Supplement 1 to UN Regulation No. [152] to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration and vote at their March 2020 sessions.

The 01 series of amendments aims at increasing the performance requirements in the Car to Pedestrian
scenario by permitting only reduced maximum impact speed compared to the original version of this
Regulation. Thereby the same maximum impact speed is required for the Car to Pedestrian as for the
Car to Car scenario. However, in the original proposal (GRVA/2019/16), the permitted maximum impact speed for an N₁ vehicle erroneously corresponds to that of an M₁ vehicle. This proposal corrects the error.

51. The expert from Japan also introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/16 proposing a new series of amendments to UN Regulation No. [152].

52. The expert from OICA introduced GRVA-04-10 with editorial amendments to the proposal.

53. GRVA adopted the proposal as amended as reproduced in GRVA-04-52 and requested the secretariat to submit it as a draft new series of amendment to UN Regulation No. [152] to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration and vote at their March 2020 sessions.

51. The expert from Japan also introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/16 proposing a new series of amendments to UN Regulation No. [152].

52. The expert from OICA introduced GRVA-04-10 with editorial amendments to the proposal.

53. GRVA adopted the proposal as amended as reproduced in GRVA-04-52 and requested the secretariat to submit it as a draft new series of amendment to UN Regulation No. [152] to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration and vote at their March 2020 sessions.

AEBS informal group proposal to introduce new and enhanced requirements for the car-to-pedestrian test scenario.

51. The expert from Japan also introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/16 proposing a new series of amendments to UN Regulation No. [152].

52. The expert from OICA introduced GRVA-04-10 with editorial amendments to the proposal.

53. GRVA adopted the proposal as amended as reproduced in GRVA-04-52 and requested the secretariat to submit it as a draft new series of amendment to UN Regulation No. [152] to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration and vote at their March 2020 sessions.

Presentation in support of the proposals for the 01 series of amendments and for Supplement 1 to UN R152 (respectively, documents GRVA/2019/16 and GRVA/2019/17.

46. Referring to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/17, the expert from Japan, Co-Chair of the IWG on AEBS introduced GRVA-04-38. He noted that para. 6.10 and the Appendix in the working document were in square brackets. The expert from Japan introduced
GRVA-04-39, proposing further amendments to Appendix 2 of Annex 3.

47. The expert from OICA introduced GRVA-04-12 with editorial amendments.

48. The expert from the Russian Federation proposed an editorial correction in para. 7.1.

49. The expert from OICA introduced GRVA-04-11, supporting the provisions in the proposed para. 6.10. for a statistical approach to evaluating AEBS performance on the basis of unsuccessful tests. GRVA decided to reconsider this proposal at its next session. The expert from China informed that their draft national standard included such considerations. He mentioned that his country would consider GRVA’s decision on this point to support harmonization, if timing allows.

50. GRVA adopted the proposal as amended (GRVA-04-51) with the deletion of the proposed para. 6.10, the correction to para. 7.1 and the amendments proposed in GRVA-04-12 and GRVA-04-39. GRVA requested the secretariat to submit it as Supplement 1 to UN Regulation No. [152] to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration and vote at their March 2020 sessions.

54. GRVA noted that GRVA-04-38 also contained information about the challenges to develop provisions for the Car-to-Bicycle scenario. GRVA agreed to request an extension of the mandate of the group until September 2020.