Proposal to modify the explanation on performance issues constituting an unreasonable risk to safety by specifying that this occurrence should be understood as deviations, degradations, or performance limitations shown by an ADS feature that affect its ability to perform the DDT within the declared ODD, triggered by events that present an unreasonable risk to safety and/or are beyond expected variability or acceptable degradation, replace “may” with “might” in references to discrete failures and risk existence, replace “Violation of” with “Non-compliance with respect to the”, delete references to identified reduction in safety margins and exceeding overall hazard exposure thresholds, replace “the rate of hazardous event occurrences” with “hazardous event exposure:”, and replace “suggests” with “could suggest”.
Proposal to add an interpretation of the term “other road user” in para. 2.21. of Definitions. The proposal defines “other road user” (ORU) as any entity making use of publicly accessible road infrastructure, covering users making intentional use of roadways with knowledge of traffic rules and other sentient entities that might be found in vehicle paths but cannot be expected to respond predictably based on vehicle signals or traffic rules, such as children and animals. The safety case would address both classes of ORU with appropriate adaptation to account for lower predictability of child and animal behaviours where relevant to the ODD of an ADS feature.
Proposal to add examples to the guidance on reporting noncompliance with DDT performance requirements under para. 6, specifying that failures include systematic or repeated deviations from DDT performance requirements defined under para. 6, non-compliance with respect to DDT performance requirements and requirements on interactions between the ADS and its user or other requirements under para. 6, and deviation from Remote Interaction/Intervention as described in the Safety case, with a note that some examples can reveal unreasonable risk to safety requiring only a single report noting this aspect.
Proposal to add examples to clarify reporting on failures to achieve mitigated risk condition. The document expands existing text on ADS failure to achieve a mitigated risk condition when necessary by adding that the ADS does not transit to a safe state in accordance with manufacturer-defined response documented in the safety case, the chosen stop location is unsafe, or the chosen stop location could be reasonably considered by the manufacturer to have contributed to a collision involving the ADS vehicle before it has moved from that location.
Task Force EDO held an intermediate online Teams meeting on 18 June 2026. The agenda was adopted without amendments. Two informal documents had been submitted to the seventy-ninth session of GRSP. Authorization to amend GTR Nos. 1 and 14 would be submitted to November session of WP.29. Amendments to UN Regulation No. 11, UN Regulation No. 21 and GTR No. 1 would remain part of Phase 1, for consideration at December session of GRSP. The Task Force reviewed proposals concerning UN Regulation No. 100 and intuitiveness, concluding further discussion was necessary. Authorization request to amend GTRs would be submitted to November session of WP.29 by Germany and Republic of Korea. Next meeting: 1-3 September in Paris.
Proposal to modify the ADS guidance and interpretation document to replace references to “The ADS” with “An ADS feature,” replace “activates accepts activation” with “activates,” replace “violation” with “failure to meet the ODD conditions,” change “the” to “an” before “ADS feature,” and add “or” between the second and third bullet points under ADS operation outside its ODD. These changes reflect the outcome of OPI subgroup meetings where stakeholders achieved a compromise solution on open items.
The agenda includes adoption of EPPR-74-01 and EPPR-73-04, transposition of UN-GTR 2 into UN-Regulation 40 across Euro 3, 4, and 5 emission levels using documents GRPE-93-07-Rev.1, GRPE-92-12, GRPE-92-13, GRPE/2025/22, GRPE-93-26, EPPR-73-02, and EPPR-73-03, maximum power determination discussions using EPPR-22-15 through EPPR-59-04, battery electric vehicle range determination standardization using EPPR-53-04 through EPPR-59-03, and deterioration factors in GTR 23 using EPPR-56-04 and EPPR-65-05. Next meetings are scheduled for 7 September 2026 and October 2026 in conjunction with 95/GRPE.