1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Document Title | UN R90: Proposal for a Supplement to the 02 series of amendments | ||||||||
Reference Number | GRVA/2019/11 | ||||||||
Date |
23 Nov 2018
|
||||||||
Summary | Proposal to align the provisions of UN R90 related to approval numbers and markings with the provisions of Schedule 4 to the 1958 Agreement. | ||||||||
Source(s) | Russia | ||||||||
Rulemaking Area(s) | UN R90 Replacement Brake Components | ||||||||
Proposal Status | Superseded | ||||||||
Meeting(s) | |||||||||
Related Documents | |||||||||
GRVA-01-15 | UN R90: Proposal for a Supplement to the 02 Series of Amendments (superseded) | ||||||||
GRVA-01-41 | UN R90: Proposal for a Supplement to the 02 series of amendments (superseded) | ||||||||
Downloads | |||||||||
UNECE server | .pdf format | .docx format | |||||||
Excerpts from session reports related to this document | |||||||||
GRVA | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1 Feb 2019 |
62. The expert from the Russian Federation introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/11 aimed at addressing the issue raised in WP.29-176-19. The expert from CLEPA expressed reservations because customs could be confused by the introduction of differences between the Approval Number and the Approval Code proposed in this document. The expert from Spain mentioned that UN Regulation No. 90 was used in various countries not being Contracting Party to the 1958 Agreement and that therefore the issue raised concerning customs could be valid. The expert from Spain stated that Transitional Provisions could be added to the document. The expert from CLEPA stated the need to first test the markets with this new approach and agreed to undertake a study. The expert from the Russian Federation agreed to submit a revised proposal for consideration at the September 2019 session of GRVA. |
||||||||
180129: GRVA postpones until September.
|