1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Document Title | French proposal for UN R79 based upon document ACSF-03-16 | ||||||||
Reference Number | ACSF-04-03 | ||||||||
Date |
12 Nov 2015
|
||||||||
Summary | Comments on the draft amendment to UN R79 addressing automated steering as it stood at the end of the third ACSF informal group session. This document also raises links to rear vision (UN R46), AEBS (UN R131), and park assist systems. | ||||||||
Source(s) | France | ||||||||
Rulemaking Area(s) | UN R79 Steering Equipment, UN R46 Indirect Vision, and UN R131 Advanced Emergency Braking | ||||||||
Meeting(s) | |||||||||
Related Documents | |||||||||
ACSF-03-16 | Final draft of the 3rd ACSF informal group session for the amendment of UN R79 (superseded) | ||||||||
GRRF-81-14 | Presentation of French views on the regulation of automatically commanded steering functions | ||||||||
Downloads | |||||||||
UNECE server | .pdf format | .docx format | |||||||
Excerpts from session reports related to this document | |||||||||
ACSF | Session 4 | 25-27 Nov 2015 |
Main content of the document from (F): (Chair): In the last WP.29-session, the Chairman of the GRRF (Bernie Frost) reported to the delegates the current work of the IWG ACSF and also, why the group has started with CAT E. It is clear, that the Regulation 79 is not the best “location” for ACSF in total, but to finalize this work in the given timeline, only this approach seem to be the most appropriate. WP.29 did not disagree with this. (OICA): Proposes to go on with the current working strategy. Main content of document from (D): Main content of document from (ROK): Comments to ACSF-03-16 The proposed amendments of the ROK-document have been discussed. The Chair asked (D) to consider the ROK comments in the next text proposal. Homework: D to consider document ACSF-04-09 in the next text proposal. |
||||||||