| Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 79 - Requirements applicable to ACSF of Category C1 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-02 |
|
Working draft from the ACSF informal group to enable the approval of driver-initiated automated lane-change systems under UN R79. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for revised ToR and RoP for the IWG on ACSF |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-19 |
|
Proposal for extend the current mandate of the informal group until September 2018. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to the 02 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 79 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-22 |
|
This proposal supplements proposal GRRF/2017/23 which amends UN R13, R13H and R140, to allow the use of the ESC tell-tale to indicate the intervention on the steering angle of one or more wheels for the purpose of vehicle stability. The intention allow design options that avoid two optical warning signals (ESC flashing + constant CSF) during an ESC intervention. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA and OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for draft amendments to UN Regulation No. 79 - Emergency Steering Function (ESF) |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-23 |
|
Draft proposal to enable the approval of automated emergency steering systems intended to avoid or mitigate collisions. The proposal based on document ACSF-14-07 submitted by OICA and CLEPA which was discussed during the 14th meeting of the ACSF informal group. The square brackets indicates paragraphs which are still under discussion in the informal group. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA and OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Comments from Tesla, Inc. on GRRF-84-02 sent to the secretariat |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-24 |
|
Comments submitted to GRRF through the secretariat proposing amendments to the draft text on automated lane-change systems. |
| Submitted by: Tesla |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to GRRF-84-02 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-28 |
|
Proposal to allow adaptation of speed and distance calculations in accordance with national speed limits since some nations enforce maximum speed limits below the 130 km/h used as the basis for the proposals on automated lane-change systems. Japan expects to refine the proposal in order to address mutual recognition concerns inherent in such recourse to national requirements. Japan further proposes clarification of the approaching vehicle (motorcycle) test target pending development of uniform test target specifications. |
| Submitted by: Japan |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 20 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Lane Change Manoeuvre representation |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-29 |
|
Diagram illustrating the phases of a lane-change maneuver as envisioned by the Category C1 ACSF amendment to UN R79. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Lane Change Manoeuvre representation |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-30 |
|
Set of diagrams illustrating the phases and timing of the test procedure for an automated lane-change maneuver as envisioned by the draft amendment to introduce Category C1 ACSF into UN R79. These figures include the vehicle under test and approaching motorcycle speeds and distances under the lane-change phases, including timing and duration of each phase. |
| Submitted by: OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Draft consolidated amendments to Regulation No. 79 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-36 |
|
Draft amendment to UN R79, including provisions for emergency steering functions (ESF), Category C[1] ACSF for lane-change maneuvers, and updating of Complex Electronic Systems (CEL) Annex 6 provisions. This document was prepared during the 84th GRRF session for consideration during the special 85th GRRF scheduled to finalize a proposal for automated lane-change systems. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 22 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| ACSF lane-change speed-distance calculation tool |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-37 |
|
Speadsheet tool designed to calculate time and distance requirements based upon speeds of vehicle under test and test target motorcycle under the proposed procedures for evaluating Category C[1] ACSF automated lane-change systems. |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Annotated provisional agenda for the 85th GRRF session |
| Reference Number: GRRF/2017/26 |
| Meeting Sessions: 85th GRRF session (11 Dec 2017) |
| Document date: 02 Oct 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for an amendment to Regulation No. 79 - Remote Control Manoeuvring |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-09 |
|
Category G vehicles (defined in the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles (R.E.3)) have specific characteristics that enable them to achieve traction on, and to traverse over, off-road terrain that would defeat and/or damage conventional road vehicles. In some situations, it would be safer for the driver to be able to manoeuvre the vehicle from outside. This proposal seeks to permit remote manoeuvring capability provided that the vehicle is designed to operate in this environment and the off-road location is confirmed throughout the whole period that the function is in use. |
| Submitted by: UK |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for a decision on GRRF activities related to Automated Driving by WP.29 at its 172nd session |
| Reference Number: WP.29-172-08 |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 172nd WP.29 session (20-23 Jun 2017) |
| Document date: 16 Jun 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Adopted amendments to GRRF/2017/23 (UN R13, 13-H, 140) |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-39 |
|
Revised proposal, as approved during the 84th GRRF session, to enable activation of the ESC optical symbol in cases of a corrective steering function intervention when the CSF intervention is activated under the control of an ESC system. The aim is to avoid separate requirements for brake-actuated and steering-actuated vehicle stability functions (VSF) that would lead to two optical warnings where only one is necessary. This would enable use of the ESC intervention tell-tale for CSF steering intervention. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 22 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 79 - Requirements applicable to ACSF of Category C1 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-02 |
|
Working draft from the ACSF informal group to enable the approval of driver-initiated automated lane-change systems under UN R79. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for revised ToR and RoP for the IWG on ACSF |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-19 |
|
Proposal for extend the current mandate of the informal group until September 2018. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to the 02 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 79 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-22 |
|
This proposal supplements proposal GRRF/2017/23 which amends UN R13, R13H and R140, to allow the use of the ESC tell-tale to indicate the intervention on the steering angle of one or more wheels for the purpose of vehicle stability. The intention allow design options that avoid two optical warning signals (ESC flashing + constant CSF) during an ESC intervention. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA and OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for draft amendments to UN Regulation No. 79 - Emergency Steering Function (ESF) |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-23 |
|
Draft proposal to enable the approval of automated emergency steering systems intended to avoid or mitigate collisions. The proposal based on document ACSF-14-07 submitted by OICA and CLEPA which was discussed during the 14th meeting of the ACSF informal group. The square brackets indicates paragraphs which are still under discussion in the informal group. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA and OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Comments from Tesla, Inc. on GRRF-84-02 sent to the secretariat |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-24 |
|
Comments submitted to GRRF through the secretariat proposing amendments to the draft text on automated lane-change systems. |
| Submitted by: Tesla |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to GRRF-84-02 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-28 |
|
Proposal to allow adaptation of speed and distance calculations in accordance with national speed limits since some nations enforce maximum speed limits below the 130 km/h used as the basis for the proposals on automated lane-change systems. Japan expects to refine the proposal in order to address mutual recognition concerns inherent in such recourse to national requirements. Japan further proposes clarification of the approaching vehicle (motorcycle) test target pending development of uniform test target specifications. |
| Submitted by: Japan |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 20 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Lane Change Manoeuvre representation |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-29 |
|
Diagram illustrating the phases of a lane-change maneuver as envisioned by the Category C1 ACSF amendment to UN R79. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Lane Change Manoeuvre representation |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-30 |
|
Set of diagrams illustrating the phases and timing of the test procedure for an automated lane-change maneuver as envisioned by the draft amendment to introduce Category C1 ACSF into UN R79. These figures include the vehicle under test and approaching motorcycle speeds and distances under the lane-change phases, including timing and duration of each phase. |
| Submitted by: OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Draft consolidated amendments to Regulation No. 79 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-36 |
|
Draft amendment to UN R79, including provisions for emergency steering functions (ESF), Category C[1] ACSF for lane-change maneuvers, and updating of Complex Electronic Systems (CEL) Annex 6 provisions. This document was prepared during the 84th GRRF session for consideration during the special 85th GRRF scheduled to finalize a proposal for automated lane-change systems. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 22 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| ACSF lane-change speed-distance calculation tool |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-37 |
|
Speadsheet tool designed to calculate time and distance requirements based upon speeds of vehicle under test and test target motorcycle under the proposed procedures for evaluating Category C[1] ACSF automated lane-change systems. |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Annotated provisional agenda for the 85th GRRF session |
| Reference Number: GRRF/2017/26 |
| Meeting Sessions: 85th GRRF session (11 Dec 2017) |
| Document date: 02 Oct 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for an amendment to Regulation No. 79 - Remote Control Manoeuvring |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-09 |
|
Category G vehicles (defined in the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles (R.E.3)) have specific characteristics that enable them to achieve traction on, and to traverse over, off-road terrain that would defeat and/or damage conventional road vehicles. In some situations, it would be safer for the driver to be able to manoeuvre the vehicle from outside. This proposal seeks to permit remote manoeuvring capability provided that the vehicle is designed to operate in this environment and the off-road location is confirmed throughout the whole period that the function is in use. |
| Submitted by: UK |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for a decision on GRRF activities related to Automated Driving by WP.29 at its 172nd session |
| Reference Number: WP.29-172-08 |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 172nd WP.29 session (20-23 Jun 2017) |
| Document date: 16 Jun 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Adopted amendments to GRRF/2017/23 (UN R13, 13-H, 140) |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-39 |
|
Revised proposal, as approved during the 84th GRRF session, to enable activation of the ESC optical symbol in cases of a corrective steering function intervention when the CSF intervention is activated under the control of an ESC system. The aim is to avoid separate requirements for brake-actuated and steering-actuated vehicle stability functions (VSF) that would lead to two optical warnings where only one is necessary. This would enable use of the ESC intervention tell-tale for CSF steering intervention. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 22 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 79 - Requirements applicable to ACSF of Category C1 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-02 |
|
Working draft from the ACSF informal group to enable the approval of driver-initiated automated lane-change systems under UN R79. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for revised ToR and RoP for the IWG on ACSF |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-19 |
|
Proposal for extend the current mandate of the informal group until September 2018. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to the 02 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 79 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-22 |
|
This proposal supplements proposal GRRF/2017/23 which amends UN R13, R13H and R140, to allow the use of the ESC tell-tale to indicate the intervention on the steering angle of one or more wheels for the purpose of vehicle stability. The intention allow design options that avoid two optical warning signals (ESC flashing + constant CSF) during an ESC intervention. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA and OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for draft amendments to UN Regulation No. 79 - Emergency Steering Function (ESF) |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-23 |
|
Draft proposal to enable the approval of automated emergency steering systems intended to avoid or mitigate collisions. The proposal based on document ACSF-14-07 submitted by OICA and CLEPA which was discussed during the 14th meeting of the ACSF informal group. The square brackets indicates paragraphs which are still under discussion in the informal group. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA and OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Comments from Tesla, Inc. on GRRF-84-02 sent to the secretariat |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-24 |
|
Comments submitted to GRRF through the secretariat proposing amendments to the draft text on automated lane-change systems. |
| Submitted by: Tesla |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to GRRF-84-02 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-28 |
|
Proposal to allow adaptation of speed and distance calculations in accordance with national speed limits since some nations enforce maximum speed limits below the 130 km/h used as the basis for the proposals on automated lane-change systems. Japan expects to refine the proposal in order to address mutual recognition concerns inherent in such recourse to national requirements. Japan further proposes clarification of the approaching vehicle (motorcycle) test target pending development of uniform test target specifications. |
| Submitted by: Japan |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 20 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Lane Change Manoeuvre representation |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-29 |
|
Diagram illustrating the phases of a lane-change maneuver as envisioned by the Category C1 ACSF amendment to UN R79. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Lane Change Manoeuvre representation |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-30 |
|
Set of diagrams illustrating the phases and timing of the test procedure for an automated lane-change maneuver as envisioned by the draft amendment to introduce Category C1 ACSF into UN R79. These figures include the vehicle under test and approaching motorcycle speeds and distances under the lane-change phases, including timing and duration of each phase. |
| Submitted by: OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Draft consolidated amendments to Regulation No. 79 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-36 |
|
Draft amendment to UN R79, including provisions for emergency steering functions (ESF), Category C[1] ACSF for lane-change maneuvers, and updating of Complex Electronic Systems (CEL) Annex 6 provisions. This document was prepared during the 84th GRRF session for consideration during the special 85th GRRF scheduled to finalize a proposal for automated lane-change systems. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 22 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| ACSF lane-change speed-distance calculation tool |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-37 |
|
Speadsheet tool designed to calculate time and distance requirements based upon speeds of vehicle under test and test target motorcycle under the proposed procedures for evaluating Category C[1] ACSF automated lane-change systems. |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Annotated provisional agenda for the 85th GRRF session |
| Reference Number: GRRF/2017/26 |
| Meeting Sessions: 85th GRRF session (11 Dec 2017) |
| Document date: 02 Oct 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for an amendment to Regulation No. 79 - Remote Control Manoeuvring |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-09 |
|
Category G vehicles (defined in the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles (R.E.3)) have specific characteristics that enable them to achieve traction on, and to traverse over, off-road terrain that would defeat and/or damage conventional road vehicles. In some situations, it would be safer for the driver to be able to manoeuvre the vehicle from outside. This proposal seeks to permit remote manoeuvring capability provided that the vehicle is designed to operate in this environment and the off-road location is confirmed throughout the whole period that the function is in use. |
| Submitted by: UK |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for a decision on GRRF activities related to Automated Driving by WP.29 at its 172nd session |
| Reference Number: WP.29-172-08 |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 172nd WP.29 session (20-23 Jun 2017) |
| Document date: 16 Jun 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Adopted amendments to GRRF/2017/23 (UN R13, 13-H, 140) |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-39 |
|
Revised proposal, as approved during the 84th GRRF session, to enable activation of the ESC optical symbol in cases of a corrective steering function intervention when the CSF intervention is activated under the control of an ESC system. The aim is to avoid separate requirements for brake-actuated and steering-actuated vehicle stability functions (VSF) that would lead to two optical warnings where only one is necessary. This would enable use of the ESC intervention tell-tale for CSF steering intervention. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 22 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 79 - Requirements applicable to ACSF of Category C1 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-02 |
|
Working draft from the ACSF informal group to enable the approval of driver-initiated automated lane-change systems under UN R79. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for revised ToR and RoP for the IWG on ACSF |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-19 |
|
Proposal for extend the current mandate of the informal group until September 2018. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to the 02 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 79 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-22 |
|
This proposal supplements proposal GRRF/2017/23 which amends UN R13, R13H and R140, to allow the use of the ESC tell-tale to indicate the intervention on the steering angle of one or more wheels for the purpose of vehicle stability. The intention allow design options that avoid two optical warning signals (ESC flashing + constant CSF) during an ESC intervention. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA and OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for draft amendments to UN Regulation No. 79 - Emergency Steering Function (ESF) |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-23 |
|
Draft proposal to enable the approval of automated emergency steering systems intended to avoid or mitigate collisions. The proposal based on document ACSF-14-07 submitted by OICA and CLEPA which was discussed during the 14th meeting of the ACSF informal group. The square brackets indicates paragraphs which are still under discussion in the informal group. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA and OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Comments from Tesla, Inc. on GRRF-84-02 sent to the secretariat |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-24 |
|
Comments submitted to GRRF through the secretariat proposing amendments to the draft text on automated lane-change systems. |
| Submitted by: Tesla |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to GRRF-84-02 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-28 |
|
Proposal to allow adaptation of speed and distance calculations in accordance with national speed limits since some nations enforce maximum speed limits below the 130 km/h used as the basis for the proposals on automated lane-change systems. Japan expects to refine the proposal in order to address mutual recognition concerns inherent in such recourse to national requirements. Japan further proposes clarification of the approaching vehicle (motorcycle) test target pending development of uniform test target specifications. |
| Submitted by: Japan |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 20 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Lane Change Manoeuvre representation |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-29 |
|
Diagram illustrating the phases of a lane-change maneuver as envisioned by the Category C1 ACSF amendment to UN R79. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Lane Change Manoeuvre representation |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-30 |
|
Set of diagrams illustrating the phases and timing of the test procedure for an automated lane-change maneuver as envisioned by the draft amendment to introduce Category C1 ACSF into UN R79. These figures include the vehicle under test and approaching motorcycle speeds and distances under the lane-change phases, including timing and duration of each phase. |
| Submitted by: OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Draft consolidated amendments to Regulation No. 79 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-36 |
|
Draft amendment to UN R79, including provisions for emergency steering functions (ESF), Category C[1] ACSF for lane-change maneuvers, and updating of Complex Electronic Systems (CEL) Annex 6 provisions. This document was prepared during the 84th GRRF session for consideration during the special 85th GRRF scheduled to finalize a proposal for automated lane-change systems. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 22 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| ACSF lane-change speed-distance calculation tool |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-37 |
|
Speadsheet tool designed to calculate time and distance requirements based upon speeds of vehicle under test and test target motorcycle under the proposed procedures for evaluating Category C[1] ACSF automated lane-change systems. |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Annotated provisional agenda for the 85th GRRF session |
| Reference Number: GRRF/2017/26 |
| Meeting Sessions: 85th GRRF session (11 Dec 2017) |
| Document date: 02 Oct 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for an amendment to Regulation No. 79 - Remote Control Manoeuvring |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-09 |
|
Category G vehicles (defined in the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles (R.E.3)) have specific characteristics that enable them to achieve traction on, and to traverse over, off-road terrain that would defeat and/or damage conventional road vehicles. In some situations, it would be safer for the driver to be able to manoeuvre the vehicle from outside. This proposal seeks to permit remote manoeuvring capability provided that the vehicle is designed to operate in this environment and the off-road location is confirmed throughout the whole period that the function is in use. |
| Submitted by: UK |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for a decision on GRRF activities related to Automated Driving by WP.29 at its 172nd session |
| Reference Number: WP.29-172-08 |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 172nd WP.29 session (20-23 Jun 2017) |
| Document date: 16 Jun 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Adopted amendments to GRRF/2017/23 (UN R13, 13-H, 140) |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-39 |
|
Revised proposal, as approved during the 84th GRRF session, to enable activation of the ESC optical symbol in cases of a corrective steering function intervention when the CSF intervention is activated under the control of an ESC system. The aim is to avoid separate requirements for brake-actuated and steering-actuated vehicle stability functions (VSF) that would lead to two optical warnings where only one is necessary. This would enable use of the ESC intervention tell-tale for CSF steering intervention. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 22 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 79 - Requirements applicable to ACSF of Category C1 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-02 |
|
Working draft from the ACSF informal group to enable the approval of driver-initiated automated lane-change systems under UN R79. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for revised ToR and RoP for the IWG on ACSF |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-19 |
|
Proposal for extend the current mandate of the informal group until September 2018. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to the 02 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 79 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-22 |
|
This proposal supplements proposal GRRF/2017/23 which amends UN R13, R13H and R140, to allow the use of the ESC tell-tale to indicate the intervention on the steering angle of one or more wheels for the purpose of vehicle stability. The intention allow design options that avoid two optical warning signals (ESC flashing + constant CSF) during an ESC intervention. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA and OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for draft amendments to UN Regulation No. 79 - Emergency Steering Function (ESF) |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-23 |
|
Draft proposal to enable the approval of automated emergency steering systems intended to avoid or mitigate collisions. The proposal based on document ACSF-14-07 submitted by OICA and CLEPA which was discussed during the 14th meeting of the ACSF informal group. The square brackets indicates paragraphs which are still under discussion in the informal group. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA and OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Comments from Tesla, Inc. on GRRF-84-02 sent to the secretariat |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-24 |
|
Comments submitted to GRRF through the secretariat proposing amendments to the draft text on automated lane-change systems. |
| Submitted by: Tesla |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to GRRF-84-02 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-28 |
|
Proposal to allow adaptation of speed and distance calculations in accordance with national speed limits since some nations enforce maximum speed limits below the 130 km/h used as the basis for the proposals on automated lane-change systems. Japan expects to refine the proposal in order to address mutual recognition concerns inherent in such recourse to national requirements. Japan further proposes clarification of the approaching vehicle (motorcycle) test target pending development of uniform test target specifications. |
| Submitted by: Japan |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 20 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Lane Change Manoeuvre representation |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-29 |
|
Diagram illustrating the phases of a lane-change maneuver as envisioned by the Category C1 ACSF amendment to UN R79. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Lane Change Manoeuvre representation |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-30 |
|
Set of diagrams illustrating the phases and timing of the test procedure for an automated lane-change maneuver as envisioned by the draft amendment to introduce Category C1 ACSF into UN R79. These figures include the vehicle under test and approaching motorcycle speeds and distances under the lane-change phases, including timing and duration of each phase. |
| Submitted by: OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Draft consolidated amendments to Regulation No. 79 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-36 |
|
Draft amendment to UN R79, including provisions for emergency steering functions (ESF), Category C[1] ACSF for lane-change maneuvers, and updating of Complex Electronic Systems (CEL) Annex 6 provisions. This document was prepared during the 84th GRRF session for consideration during the special 85th GRRF scheduled to finalize a proposal for automated lane-change systems. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 22 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| ACSF lane-change speed-distance calculation tool |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-37 |
|
Speadsheet tool designed to calculate time and distance requirements based upon speeds of vehicle under test and test target motorcycle under the proposed procedures for evaluating Category C[1] ACSF automated lane-change systems. |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Annotated provisional agenda for the 85th GRRF session |
| Reference Number: GRRF/2017/26 |
| Meeting Sessions: 85th GRRF session (11 Dec 2017) |
| Document date: 02 Oct 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for an amendment to Regulation No. 79 - Remote Control Manoeuvring |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-09 |
|
Category G vehicles (defined in the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles (R.E.3)) have specific characteristics that enable them to achieve traction on, and to traverse over, off-road terrain that would defeat and/or damage conventional road vehicles. In some situations, it would be safer for the driver to be able to manoeuvre the vehicle from outside. This proposal seeks to permit remote manoeuvring capability provided that the vehicle is designed to operate in this environment and the off-road location is confirmed throughout the whole period that the function is in use. |
| Submitted by: UK |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for a decision on GRRF activities related to Automated Driving by WP.29 at its 172nd session |
| Reference Number: WP.29-172-08 |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 172nd WP.29 session (20-23 Jun 2017) |
| Document date: 16 Jun 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Adopted amendments to GRRF/2017/23 (UN R13, 13-H, 140) |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-39 |
|
Revised proposal, as approved during the 84th GRRF session, to enable activation of the ESC optical symbol in cases of a corrective steering function intervention when the CSF intervention is activated under the control of an ESC system. The aim is to avoid separate requirements for brake-actuated and steering-actuated vehicle stability functions (VSF) that would lead to two optical warnings where only one is necessary. This would enable use of the ESC intervention tell-tale for CSF steering intervention. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 22 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 79 - Requirements applicable to ACSF of Category C1 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-02 |
|
Working draft from the ACSF informal group to enable the approval of driver-initiated automated lane-change systems under UN R79. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for revised ToR and RoP for the IWG on ACSF |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-19 |
|
Proposal for extend the current mandate of the informal group until September 2018. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to the 02 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 79 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-22 |
|
This proposal supplements proposal GRRF/2017/23 which amends UN R13, R13H and R140, to allow the use of the ESC tell-tale to indicate the intervention on the steering angle of one or more wheels for the purpose of vehicle stability. The intention allow design options that avoid two optical warning signals (ESC flashing + constant CSF) during an ESC intervention. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA and OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for draft amendments to UN Regulation No. 79 - Emergency Steering Function (ESF) |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-23 |
|
Draft proposal to enable the approval of automated emergency steering systems intended to avoid or mitigate collisions. The proposal based on document ACSF-14-07 submitted by OICA and CLEPA which was discussed during the 14th meeting of the ACSF informal group. The square brackets indicates paragraphs which are still under discussion in the informal group. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA and OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Comments from Tesla, Inc. on GRRF-84-02 sent to the secretariat |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-24 |
|
Comments submitted to GRRF through the secretariat proposing amendments to the draft text on automated lane-change systems. |
| Submitted by: Tesla |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to GRRF-84-02 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-28 |
|
Proposal to allow adaptation of speed and distance calculations in accordance with national speed limits since some nations enforce maximum speed limits below the 130 km/h used as the basis for the proposals on automated lane-change systems. Japan expects to refine the proposal in order to address mutual recognition concerns inherent in such recourse to national requirements. Japan further proposes clarification of the approaching vehicle (motorcycle) test target pending development of uniform test target specifications. |
| Submitted by: Japan |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 20 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Lane Change Manoeuvre representation |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-29 |
|
Diagram illustrating the phases of a lane-change maneuver as envisioned by the Category C1 ACSF amendment to UN R79. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Lane Change Manoeuvre representation |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-30 |
|
Set of diagrams illustrating the phases and timing of the test procedure for an automated lane-change maneuver as envisioned by the draft amendment to introduce Category C1 ACSF into UN R79. These figures include the vehicle under test and approaching motorcycle speeds and distances under the lane-change phases, including timing and duration of each phase. |
| Submitted by: OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Draft consolidated amendments to Regulation No. 79 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-36 |
|
Draft amendment to UN R79, including provisions for emergency steering functions (ESF), Category C[1] ACSF for lane-change maneuvers, and updating of Complex Electronic Systems (CEL) Annex 6 provisions. This document was prepared during the 84th GRRF session for consideration during the special 85th GRRF scheduled to finalize a proposal for automated lane-change systems. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 22 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| ACSF lane-change speed-distance calculation tool |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-37 |
|
Speadsheet tool designed to calculate time and distance requirements based upon speeds of vehicle under test and test target motorcycle under the proposed procedures for evaluating Category C[1] ACSF automated lane-change systems. |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Annotated provisional agenda for the 85th GRRF session |
| Reference Number: GRRF/2017/26 |
| Meeting Sessions: 85th GRRF session (11 Dec 2017) |
| Document date: 02 Oct 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for an amendment to Regulation No. 79 - Remote Control Manoeuvring |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-09 |
|
Category G vehicles (defined in the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles (R.E.3)) have specific characteristics that enable them to achieve traction on, and to traverse over, off-road terrain that would defeat and/or damage conventional road vehicles. In some situations, it would be safer for the driver to be able to manoeuvre the vehicle from outside. This proposal seeks to permit remote manoeuvring capability provided that the vehicle is designed to operate in this environment and the off-road location is confirmed throughout the whole period that the function is in use. |
| Submitted by: UK |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for a decision on GRRF activities related to Automated Driving by WP.29 at its 172nd session |
| Reference Number: WP.29-172-08 |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 172nd WP.29 session (20-23 Jun 2017) |
| Document date: 16 Jun 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Adopted amendments to GRRF/2017/23 (UN R13, 13-H, 140) |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-39 |
|
Revised proposal, as approved during the 84th GRRF session, to enable activation of the ESC optical symbol in cases of a corrective steering function intervention when the CSF intervention is activated under the control of an ESC system. The aim is to avoid separate requirements for brake-actuated and steering-actuated vehicle stability functions (VSF) that would lead to two optical warnings where only one is necessary. This would enable use of the ESC intervention tell-tale for CSF steering intervention. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 22 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 79 - Requirements applicable to ACSF of Category C1 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-02 |
|
Working draft from the ACSF informal group to enable the approval of driver-initiated automated lane-change systems under UN R79. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for revised ToR and RoP for the IWG on ACSF |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-19 |
|
Proposal for extend the current mandate of the informal group until September 2018. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to the 02 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 79 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-22 |
|
This proposal supplements proposal GRRF/2017/23 which amends UN R13, R13H and R140, to allow the use of the ESC tell-tale to indicate the intervention on the steering angle of one or more wheels for the purpose of vehicle stability. The intention allow design options that avoid two optical warning signals (ESC flashing + constant CSF) during an ESC intervention. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA and OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for draft amendments to UN Regulation No. 79 - Emergency Steering Function (ESF) |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-23 |
|
Draft proposal to enable the approval of automated emergency steering systems intended to avoid or mitigate collisions. The proposal based on document ACSF-14-07 submitted by OICA and CLEPA which was discussed during the 14th meeting of the ACSF informal group. The square brackets indicates paragraphs which are still under discussion in the informal group. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA and OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Comments from Tesla, Inc. on GRRF-84-02 sent to the secretariat |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-24 |
|
Comments submitted to GRRF through the secretariat proposing amendments to the draft text on automated lane-change systems. |
| Submitted by: Tesla |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to GRRF-84-02 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-28 |
|
Proposal to allow adaptation of speed and distance calculations in accordance with national speed limits since some nations enforce maximum speed limits below the 130 km/h used as the basis for the proposals on automated lane-change systems. Japan expects to refine the proposal in order to address mutual recognition concerns inherent in such recourse to national requirements. Japan further proposes clarification of the approaching vehicle (motorcycle) test target pending development of uniform test target specifications. |
| Submitted by: Japan |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 20 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Lane Change Manoeuvre representation |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-29 |
|
Diagram illustrating the phases of a lane-change maneuver as envisioned by the Category C1 ACSF amendment to UN R79. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Lane Change Manoeuvre representation |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-30 |
|
Set of diagrams illustrating the phases and timing of the test procedure for an automated lane-change maneuver as envisioned by the draft amendment to introduce Category C1 ACSF into UN R79. These figures include the vehicle under test and approaching motorcycle speeds and distances under the lane-change phases, including timing and duration of each phase. |
| Submitted by: OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Draft consolidated amendments to Regulation No. 79 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-36 |
|
Draft amendment to UN R79, including provisions for emergency steering functions (ESF), Category C[1] ACSF for lane-change maneuvers, and updating of Complex Electronic Systems (CEL) Annex 6 provisions. This document was prepared during the 84th GRRF session for consideration during the special 85th GRRF scheduled to finalize a proposal for automated lane-change systems. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 22 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| ACSF lane-change speed-distance calculation tool |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-37 |
|
Speadsheet tool designed to calculate time and distance requirements based upon speeds of vehicle under test and test target motorcycle under the proposed procedures for evaluating Category C[1] ACSF automated lane-change systems. |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Annotated provisional agenda for the 85th GRRF session |
| Reference Number: GRRF/2017/26 |
| Meeting Sessions: 85th GRRF session (11 Dec 2017) |
| Document date: 02 Oct 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for an amendment to Regulation No. 79 - Remote Control Manoeuvring |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-09 |
|
Category G vehicles (defined in the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles (R.E.3)) have specific characteristics that enable them to achieve traction on, and to traverse over, off-road terrain that would defeat and/or damage conventional road vehicles. In some situations, it would be safer for the driver to be able to manoeuvre the vehicle from outside. This proposal seeks to permit remote manoeuvring capability provided that the vehicle is designed to operate in this environment and the off-road location is confirmed throughout the whole period that the function is in use. |
| Submitted by: UK |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for a decision on GRRF activities related to Automated Driving by WP.29 at its 172nd session |
| Reference Number: WP.29-172-08 |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 172nd WP.29 session (20-23 Jun 2017) |
| Document date: 16 Jun 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Adopted amendments to GRRF/2017/23 (UN R13, 13-H, 140) |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-39 |
|
Revised proposal, as approved during the 84th GRRF session, to enable activation of the ESC optical symbol in cases of a corrective steering function intervention when the CSF intervention is activated under the control of an ESC system. The aim is to avoid separate requirements for brake-actuated and steering-actuated vehicle stability functions (VSF) that would lead to two optical warnings where only one is necessary. This would enable use of the ESC intervention tell-tale for CSF steering intervention. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 22 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 79 - Requirements applicable to ACSF of Category C1 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-02 |
|
Working draft from the ACSF informal group to enable the approval of driver-initiated automated lane-change systems under UN R79. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for revised ToR and RoP for the IWG on ACSF |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-19 |
|
Proposal for extend the current mandate of the informal group until September 2018. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to the 02 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 79 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-22 |
|
This proposal supplements proposal GRRF/2017/23 which amends UN R13, R13H and R140, to allow the use of the ESC tell-tale to indicate the intervention on the steering angle of one or more wheels for the purpose of vehicle stability. The intention allow design options that avoid two optical warning signals (ESC flashing + constant CSF) during an ESC intervention. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA and OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for draft amendments to UN Regulation No. 79 - Emergency Steering Function (ESF) |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-23 |
|
Draft proposal to enable the approval of automated emergency steering systems intended to avoid or mitigate collisions. The proposal based on document ACSF-14-07 submitted by OICA and CLEPA which was discussed during the 14th meeting of the ACSF informal group. The square brackets indicates paragraphs which are still under discussion in the informal group. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA and OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Comments from Tesla, Inc. on GRRF-84-02 sent to the secretariat |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-24 |
|
Comments submitted to GRRF through the secretariat proposing amendments to the draft text on automated lane-change systems. |
| Submitted by: Tesla |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to GRRF-84-02 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-28 |
|
Proposal to allow adaptation of speed and distance calculations in accordance with national speed limits since some nations enforce maximum speed limits below the 130 km/h used as the basis for the proposals on automated lane-change systems. Japan expects to refine the proposal in order to address mutual recognition concerns inherent in such recourse to national requirements. Japan further proposes clarification of the approaching vehicle (motorcycle) test target pending development of uniform test target specifications. |
| Submitted by: Japan |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 20 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Lane Change Manoeuvre representation |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-29 |
|
Diagram illustrating the phases of a lane-change maneuver as envisioned by the Category C1 ACSF amendment to UN R79. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Lane Change Manoeuvre representation |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-30 |
|
Set of diagrams illustrating the phases and timing of the test procedure for an automated lane-change maneuver as envisioned by the draft amendment to introduce Category C1 ACSF into UN R79. These figures include the vehicle under test and approaching motorcycle speeds and distances under the lane-change phases, including timing and duration of each phase. |
| Submitted by: OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Draft consolidated amendments to Regulation No. 79 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-36 |
|
Draft amendment to UN R79, including provisions for emergency steering functions (ESF), Category C[1] ACSF for lane-change maneuvers, and updating of Complex Electronic Systems (CEL) Annex 6 provisions. This document was prepared during the 84th GRRF session for consideration during the special 85th GRRF scheduled to finalize a proposal for automated lane-change systems. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 22 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| ACSF lane-change speed-distance calculation tool |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-37 |
|
Speadsheet tool designed to calculate time and distance requirements based upon speeds of vehicle under test and test target motorcycle under the proposed procedures for evaluating Category C[1] ACSF automated lane-change systems. |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Annotated provisional agenda for the 85th GRRF session |
| Reference Number: GRRF/2017/26 |
| Meeting Sessions: 85th GRRF session (11 Dec 2017) |
| Document date: 02 Oct 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for an amendment to Regulation No. 79 - Remote Control Manoeuvring |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-09 |
|
Category G vehicles (defined in the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles (R.E.3)) have specific characteristics that enable them to achieve traction on, and to traverse over, off-road terrain that would defeat and/or damage conventional road vehicles. In some situations, it would be safer for the driver to be able to manoeuvre the vehicle from outside. This proposal seeks to permit remote manoeuvring capability provided that the vehicle is designed to operate in this environment and the off-road location is confirmed throughout the whole period that the function is in use. |
| Submitted by: UK |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for a decision on GRRF activities related to Automated Driving by WP.29 at its 172nd session |
| Reference Number: WP.29-172-08 |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 172nd WP.29 session (20-23 Jun 2017) |
| Document date: 16 Jun 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Adopted amendments to GRRF/2017/23 (UN R13, 13-H, 140) |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-39 |
|
Revised proposal, as approved during the 84th GRRF session, to enable activation of the ESC optical symbol in cases of a corrective steering function intervention when the CSF intervention is activated under the control of an ESC system. The aim is to avoid separate requirements for brake-actuated and steering-actuated vehicle stability functions (VSF) that would lead to two optical warnings where only one is necessary. This would enable use of the ESC intervention tell-tale for CSF steering intervention. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 22 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 79 - Requirements applicable to ACSF of Category C1 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-02 |
|
Working draft from the ACSF informal group to enable the approval of driver-initiated automated lane-change systems under UN R79. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for revised ToR and RoP for the IWG on ACSF |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-19 |
|
Proposal for extend the current mandate of the informal group until September 2018. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to the 02 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 79 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-22 |
|
This proposal supplements proposal GRRF/2017/23 which amends UN R13, R13H and R140, to allow the use of the ESC tell-tale to indicate the intervention on the steering angle of one or more wheels for the purpose of vehicle stability. The intention allow design options that avoid two optical warning signals (ESC flashing + constant CSF) during an ESC intervention. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA and OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for draft amendments to UN Regulation No. 79 - Emergency Steering Function (ESF) |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-23 |
|
Draft proposal to enable the approval of automated emergency steering systems intended to avoid or mitigate collisions. The proposal based on document ACSF-14-07 submitted by OICA and CLEPA which was discussed during the 14th meeting of the ACSF informal group. The square brackets indicates paragraphs which are still under discussion in the informal group. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA and OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Comments from Tesla, Inc. on GRRF-84-02 sent to the secretariat |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-24 |
|
Comments submitted to GRRF through the secretariat proposing amendments to the draft text on automated lane-change systems. |
| Submitted by: Tesla |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to GRRF-84-02 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-28 |
|
Proposal to allow adaptation of speed and distance calculations in accordance with national speed limits since some nations enforce maximum speed limits below the 130 km/h used as the basis for the proposals on automated lane-change systems. Japan expects to refine the proposal in order to address mutual recognition concerns inherent in such recourse to national requirements. Japan further proposes clarification of the approaching vehicle (motorcycle) test target pending development of uniform test target specifications. |
| Submitted by: Japan |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 20 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Lane Change Manoeuvre representation |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-29 |
|
Diagram illustrating the phases of a lane-change maneuver as envisioned by the Category C1 ACSF amendment to UN R79. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Lane Change Manoeuvre representation |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-30 |
|
Set of diagrams illustrating the phases and timing of the test procedure for an automated lane-change maneuver as envisioned by the draft amendment to introduce Category C1 ACSF into UN R79. These figures include the vehicle under test and approaching motorcycle speeds and distances under the lane-change phases, including timing and duration of each phase. |
| Submitted by: OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Draft consolidated amendments to Regulation No. 79 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-36 |
|
Draft amendment to UN R79, including provisions for emergency steering functions (ESF), Category C[1] ACSF for lane-change maneuvers, and updating of Complex Electronic Systems (CEL) Annex 6 provisions. This document was prepared during the 84th GRRF session for consideration during the special 85th GRRF scheduled to finalize a proposal for automated lane-change systems. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 22 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| ACSF lane-change speed-distance calculation tool |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-37 |
|
Speadsheet tool designed to calculate time and distance requirements based upon speeds of vehicle under test and test target motorcycle under the proposed procedures for evaluating Category C[1] ACSF automated lane-change systems. |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Annotated provisional agenda for the 85th GRRF session |
| Reference Number: GRRF/2017/26 |
| Meeting Sessions: 85th GRRF session (11 Dec 2017) |
| Document date: 02 Oct 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for an amendment to Regulation No. 79 - Remote Control Manoeuvring |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-09 |
|
Category G vehicles (defined in the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles (R.E.3)) have specific characteristics that enable them to achieve traction on, and to traverse over, off-road terrain that would defeat and/or damage conventional road vehicles. In some situations, it would be safer for the driver to be able to manoeuvre the vehicle from outside. This proposal seeks to permit remote manoeuvring capability provided that the vehicle is designed to operate in this environment and the off-road location is confirmed throughout the whole period that the function is in use. |
| Submitted by: UK |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for a decision on GRRF activities related to Automated Driving by WP.29 at its 172nd session |
| Reference Number: WP.29-172-08 |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 172nd WP.29 session (20-23 Jun 2017) |
| Document date: 16 Jun 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Adopted amendments to GRRF/2017/23 (UN R13, 13-H, 140) |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-39 |
|
Revised proposal, as approved during the 84th GRRF session, to enable activation of the ESC optical symbol in cases of a corrective steering function intervention when the CSF intervention is activated under the control of an ESC system. The aim is to avoid separate requirements for brake-actuated and steering-actuated vehicle stability functions (VSF) that would lead to two optical warnings where only one is necessary. This would enable use of the ESC intervention tell-tale for CSF steering intervention. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 22 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 79 - Requirements applicable to ACSF of Category C1 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-02 |
|
Working draft from the ACSF informal group to enable the approval of driver-initiated automated lane-change systems under UN R79. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for revised ToR and RoP for the IWG on ACSF |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-19 |
|
Proposal for extend the current mandate of the informal group until September 2018. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to the 02 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 79 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-22 |
|
This proposal supplements proposal GRRF/2017/23 which amends UN R13, R13H and R140, to allow the use of the ESC tell-tale to indicate the intervention on the steering angle of one or more wheels for the purpose of vehicle stability. The intention allow design options that avoid two optical warning signals (ESC flashing + constant CSF) during an ESC intervention. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA and OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for draft amendments to UN Regulation No. 79 - Emergency Steering Function (ESF) |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-23 |
|
Draft proposal to enable the approval of automated emergency steering systems intended to avoid or mitigate collisions. The proposal based on document ACSF-14-07 submitted by OICA and CLEPA which was discussed during the 14th meeting of the ACSF informal group. The square brackets indicates paragraphs which are still under discussion in the informal group. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA and OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Comments from Tesla, Inc. on GRRF-84-02 sent to the secretariat |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-24 |
|
Comments submitted to GRRF through the secretariat proposing amendments to the draft text on automated lane-change systems. |
| Submitted by: Tesla |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to GRRF-84-02 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-28 |
|
Proposal to allow adaptation of speed and distance calculations in accordance with national speed limits since some nations enforce maximum speed limits below the 130 km/h used as the basis for the proposals on automated lane-change systems. Japan expects to refine the proposal in order to address mutual recognition concerns inherent in such recourse to national requirements. Japan further proposes clarification of the approaching vehicle (motorcycle) test target pending development of uniform test target specifications. |
| Submitted by: Japan |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 20 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Lane Change Manoeuvre representation |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-29 |
|
Diagram illustrating the phases of a lane-change maneuver as envisioned by the Category C1 ACSF amendment to UN R79. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Lane Change Manoeuvre representation |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-30 |
|
Set of diagrams illustrating the phases and timing of the test procedure for an automated lane-change maneuver as envisioned by the draft amendment to introduce Category C1 ACSF into UN R79. These figures include the vehicle under test and approaching motorcycle speeds and distances under the lane-change phases, including timing and duration of each phase. |
| Submitted by: OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Draft consolidated amendments to Regulation No. 79 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-36 |
|
Draft amendment to UN R79, including provisions for emergency steering functions (ESF), Category C[1] ACSF for lane-change maneuvers, and updating of Complex Electronic Systems (CEL) Annex 6 provisions. This document was prepared during the 84th GRRF session for consideration during the special 85th GRRF scheduled to finalize a proposal for automated lane-change systems. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 22 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| ACSF lane-change speed-distance calculation tool |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-37 |
|
Speadsheet tool designed to calculate time and distance requirements based upon speeds of vehicle under test and test target motorcycle under the proposed procedures for evaluating Category C[1] ACSF automated lane-change systems. |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Annotated provisional agenda for the 85th GRRF session |
| Reference Number: GRRF/2017/26 |
| Meeting Sessions: 85th GRRF session (11 Dec 2017) |
| Document date: 02 Oct 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for an amendment to Regulation No. 79 - Remote Control Manoeuvring |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-09 |
|
Category G vehicles (defined in the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles (R.E.3)) have specific characteristics that enable them to achieve traction on, and to traverse over, off-road terrain that would defeat and/or damage conventional road vehicles. In some situations, it would be safer for the driver to be able to manoeuvre the vehicle from outside. This proposal seeks to permit remote manoeuvring capability provided that the vehicle is designed to operate in this environment and the off-road location is confirmed throughout the whole period that the function is in use. |
| Submitted by: UK |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for a decision on GRRF activities related to Automated Driving by WP.29 at its 172nd session |
| Reference Number: WP.29-172-08 |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 172nd WP.29 session (20-23 Jun 2017) |
| Document date: 16 Jun 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Adopted amendments to GRRF/2017/23 (UN R13, 13-H, 140) |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-39 |
|
Revised proposal, as approved during the 84th GRRF session, to enable activation of the ESC optical symbol in cases of a corrective steering function intervention when the CSF intervention is activated under the control of an ESC system. The aim is to avoid separate requirements for brake-actuated and steering-actuated vehicle stability functions (VSF) that would lead to two optical warnings where only one is necessary. This would enable use of the ESC intervention tell-tale for CSF steering intervention. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 22 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 79 - Requirements applicable to ACSF of Category C1 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-02 |
|
Working draft from the ACSF informal group to enable the approval of driver-initiated automated lane-change systems under UN R79. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for revised ToR and RoP for the IWG on ACSF |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-19 |
|
Proposal for extend the current mandate of the informal group until September 2018. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to the 02 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 79 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-22 |
|
This proposal supplements proposal GRRF/2017/23 which amends UN R13, R13H and R140, to allow the use of the ESC tell-tale to indicate the intervention on the steering angle of one or more wheels for the purpose of vehicle stability. The intention allow design options that avoid two optical warning signals (ESC flashing + constant CSF) during an ESC intervention. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA and OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for draft amendments to UN Regulation No. 79 - Emergency Steering Function (ESF) |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-23 |
|
Draft proposal to enable the approval of automated emergency steering systems intended to avoid or mitigate collisions. The proposal based on document ACSF-14-07 submitted by OICA and CLEPA which was discussed during the 14th meeting of the ACSF informal group. The square brackets indicates paragraphs which are still under discussion in the informal group. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA and OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Comments from Tesla, Inc. on GRRF-84-02 sent to the secretariat |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-24 |
|
Comments submitted to GRRF through the secretariat proposing amendments to the draft text on automated lane-change systems. |
| Submitted by: Tesla |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to GRRF-84-02 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-28 |
|
Proposal to allow adaptation of speed and distance calculations in accordance with national speed limits since some nations enforce maximum speed limits below the 130 km/h used as the basis for the proposals on automated lane-change systems. Japan expects to refine the proposal in order to address mutual recognition concerns inherent in such recourse to national requirements. Japan further proposes clarification of the approaching vehicle (motorcycle) test target pending development of uniform test target specifications. |
| Submitted by: Japan |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 20 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Lane Change Manoeuvre representation |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-29 |
|
Diagram illustrating the phases of a lane-change maneuver as envisioned by the Category C1 ACSF amendment to UN R79. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Lane Change Manoeuvre representation |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-30 |
|
Set of diagrams illustrating the phases and timing of the test procedure for an automated lane-change maneuver as envisioned by the draft amendment to introduce Category C1 ACSF into UN R79. These figures include the vehicle under test and approaching motorcycle speeds and distances under the lane-change phases, including timing and duration of each phase. |
| Submitted by: OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Draft consolidated amendments to Regulation No. 79 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-36 |
|
Draft amendment to UN R79, including provisions for emergency steering functions (ESF), Category C[1] ACSF for lane-change maneuvers, and updating of Complex Electronic Systems (CEL) Annex 6 provisions. This document was prepared during the 84th GRRF session for consideration during the special 85th GRRF scheduled to finalize a proposal for automated lane-change systems. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 22 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| ACSF lane-change speed-distance calculation tool |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-37 |
|
Speadsheet tool designed to calculate time and distance requirements based upon speeds of vehicle under test and test target motorcycle under the proposed procedures for evaluating Category C[1] ACSF automated lane-change systems. |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Annotated provisional agenda for the 85th GRRF session |
| Reference Number: GRRF/2017/26 |
| Meeting Sessions: 85th GRRF session (11 Dec 2017) |
| Document date: 02 Oct 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for an amendment to Regulation No. 79 - Remote Control Manoeuvring |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-09 |
|
Category G vehicles (defined in the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles (R.E.3)) have specific characteristics that enable them to achieve traction on, and to traverse over, off-road terrain that would defeat and/or damage conventional road vehicles. In some situations, it would be safer for the driver to be able to manoeuvre the vehicle from outside. This proposal seeks to permit remote manoeuvring capability provided that the vehicle is designed to operate in this environment and the off-road location is confirmed throughout the whole period that the function is in use. |
| Submitted by: UK |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for a decision on GRRF activities related to Automated Driving by WP.29 at its 172nd session |
| Reference Number: WP.29-172-08 |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 172nd WP.29 session (20-23 Jun 2017) |
| Document date: 16 Jun 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Adopted amendments to GRRF/2017/23 (UN R13, 13-H, 140) |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-39 |
|
Revised proposal, as approved during the 84th GRRF session, to enable activation of the ESC optical symbol in cases of a corrective steering function intervention when the CSF intervention is activated under the control of an ESC system. The aim is to avoid separate requirements for brake-actuated and steering-actuated vehicle stability functions (VSF) that would lead to two optical warnings where only one is necessary. This would enable use of the ESC intervention tell-tale for CSF steering intervention. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 22 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 79 - Requirements applicable to ACSF of Category C1 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-02 |
|
Working draft from the ACSF informal group to enable the approval of driver-initiated automated lane-change systems under UN R79. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for revised ToR and RoP for the IWG on ACSF |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-19 |
|
Proposal for extend the current mandate of the informal group until September 2018. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to the 02 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 79 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-22 |
|
This proposal supplements proposal GRRF/2017/23 which amends UN R13, R13H and R140, to allow the use of the ESC tell-tale to indicate the intervention on the steering angle of one or more wheels for the purpose of vehicle stability. The intention allow design options that avoid two optical warning signals (ESC flashing + constant CSF) during an ESC intervention. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA and OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for draft amendments to UN Regulation No. 79 - Emergency Steering Function (ESF) |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-23 |
|
Draft proposal to enable the approval of automated emergency steering systems intended to avoid or mitigate collisions. The proposal based on document ACSF-14-07 submitted by OICA and CLEPA which was discussed during the 14th meeting of the ACSF informal group. The square brackets indicates paragraphs which are still under discussion in the informal group. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA and OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Comments from Tesla, Inc. on GRRF-84-02 sent to the secretariat |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-24 |
|
Comments submitted to GRRF through the secretariat proposing amendments to the draft text on automated lane-change systems. |
| Submitted by: Tesla |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to GRRF-84-02 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-28 |
|
Proposal to allow adaptation of speed and distance calculations in accordance with national speed limits since some nations enforce maximum speed limits below the 130 km/h used as the basis for the proposals on automated lane-change systems. Japan expects to refine the proposal in order to address mutual recognition concerns inherent in such recourse to national requirements. Japan further proposes clarification of the approaching vehicle (motorcycle) test target pending development of uniform test target specifications. |
| Submitted by: Japan |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 20 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Lane Change Manoeuvre representation |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-29 |
|
Diagram illustrating the phases of a lane-change maneuver as envisioned by the Category C1 ACSF amendment to UN R79. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Lane Change Manoeuvre representation |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-30 |
|
Set of diagrams illustrating the phases and timing of the test procedure for an automated lane-change maneuver as envisioned by the draft amendment to introduce Category C1 ACSF into UN R79. These figures include the vehicle under test and approaching motorcycle speeds and distances under the lane-change phases, including timing and duration of each phase. |
| Submitted by: OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Draft consolidated amendments to Regulation No. 79 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-36 |
|
Draft amendment to UN R79, including provisions for emergency steering functions (ESF), Category C[1] ACSF for lane-change maneuvers, and updating of Complex Electronic Systems (CEL) Annex 6 provisions. This document was prepared during the 84th GRRF session for consideration during the special 85th GRRF scheduled to finalize a proposal for automated lane-change systems. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 22 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| ACSF lane-change speed-distance calculation tool |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-37 |
|
Speadsheet tool designed to calculate time and distance requirements based upon speeds of vehicle under test and test target motorcycle under the proposed procedures for evaluating Category C[1] ACSF automated lane-change systems. |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Annotated provisional agenda for the 85th GRRF session |
| Reference Number: GRRF/2017/26 |
| Meeting Sessions: 85th GRRF session (11 Dec 2017) |
| Document date: 02 Oct 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for an amendment to Regulation No. 79 - Remote Control Manoeuvring |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-09 |
|
Category G vehicles (defined in the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles (R.E.3)) have specific characteristics that enable them to achieve traction on, and to traverse over, off-road terrain that would defeat and/or damage conventional road vehicles. In some situations, it would be safer for the driver to be able to manoeuvre the vehicle from outside. This proposal seeks to permit remote manoeuvring capability provided that the vehicle is designed to operate in this environment and the off-road location is confirmed throughout the whole period that the function is in use. |
| Submitted by: UK |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for a decision on GRRF activities related to Automated Driving by WP.29 at its 172nd session |
| Reference Number: WP.29-172-08 |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 172nd WP.29 session (20-23 Jun 2017) |
| Document date: 16 Jun 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Adopted amendments to GRRF/2017/23 (UN R13, 13-H, 140) |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-39 |
|
Revised proposal, as approved during the 84th GRRF session, to enable activation of the ESC optical symbol in cases of a corrective steering function intervention when the CSF intervention is activated under the control of an ESC system. The aim is to avoid separate requirements for brake-actuated and steering-actuated vehicle stability functions (VSF) that would lead to two optical warnings where only one is necessary. This would enable use of the ESC intervention tell-tale for CSF steering intervention. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 22 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 79 - Requirements applicable to ACSF of Category C1 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-02 |
|
Working draft from the ACSF informal group to enable the approval of driver-initiated automated lane-change systems under UN R79. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for revised ToR and RoP for the IWG on ACSF |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-19 |
|
Proposal for extend the current mandate of the informal group until September 2018. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to the 02 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 79 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-22 |
|
This proposal supplements proposal GRRF/2017/23 which amends UN R13, R13H and R140, to allow the use of the ESC tell-tale to indicate the intervention on the steering angle of one or more wheels for the purpose of vehicle stability. The intention allow design options that avoid two optical warning signals (ESC flashing + constant CSF) during an ESC intervention. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA and OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for draft amendments to UN Regulation No. 79 - Emergency Steering Function (ESF) |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-23 |
|
Draft proposal to enable the approval of automated emergency steering systems intended to avoid or mitigate collisions. The proposal based on document ACSF-14-07 submitted by OICA and CLEPA which was discussed during the 14th meeting of the ACSF informal group. The square brackets indicates paragraphs which are still under discussion in the informal group. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA and OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Comments from Tesla, Inc. on GRRF-84-02 sent to the secretariat |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-24 |
|
Comments submitted to GRRF through the secretariat proposing amendments to the draft text on automated lane-change systems. |
| Submitted by: Tesla |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to GRRF-84-02 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-28 |
|
Proposal to allow adaptation of speed and distance calculations in accordance with national speed limits since some nations enforce maximum speed limits below the 130 km/h used as the basis for the proposals on automated lane-change systems. Japan expects to refine the proposal in order to address mutual recognition concerns inherent in such recourse to national requirements. Japan further proposes clarification of the approaching vehicle (motorcycle) test target pending development of uniform test target specifications. |
| Submitted by: Japan |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 20 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Lane Change Manoeuvre representation |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-29 |
|
Diagram illustrating the phases of a lane-change maneuver as envisioned by the Category C1 ACSF amendment to UN R79. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Lane Change Manoeuvre representation |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-30 |
|
Set of diagrams illustrating the phases and timing of the test procedure for an automated lane-change maneuver as envisioned by the draft amendment to introduce Category C1 ACSF into UN R79. These figures include the vehicle under test and approaching motorcycle speeds and distances under the lane-change phases, including timing and duration of each phase. |
| Submitted by: OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Draft consolidated amendments to Regulation No. 79 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-36 |
|
Draft amendment to UN R79, including provisions for emergency steering functions (ESF), Category C[1] ACSF for lane-change maneuvers, and updating of Complex Electronic Systems (CEL) Annex 6 provisions. This document was prepared during the 84th GRRF session for consideration during the special 85th GRRF scheduled to finalize a proposal for automated lane-change systems. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 22 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| ACSF lane-change speed-distance calculation tool |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-37 |
|
Speadsheet tool designed to calculate time and distance requirements based upon speeds of vehicle under test and test target motorcycle under the proposed procedures for evaluating Category C[1] ACSF automated lane-change systems. |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Annotated provisional agenda for the 85th GRRF session |
| Reference Number: GRRF/2017/26 |
| Meeting Sessions: 85th GRRF session (11 Dec 2017) |
| Document date: 02 Oct 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for an amendment to Regulation No. 79 - Remote Control Manoeuvring |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-09 |
|
Category G vehicles (defined in the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles (R.E.3)) have specific characteristics that enable them to achieve traction on, and to traverse over, off-road terrain that would defeat and/or damage conventional road vehicles. In some situations, it would be safer for the driver to be able to manoeuvre the vehicle from outside. This proposal seeks to permit remote manoeuvring capability provided that the vehicle is designed to operate in this environment and the off-road location is confirmed throughout the whole period that the function is in use. |
| Submitted by: UK |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for a decision on GRRF activities related to Automated Driving by WP.29 at its 172nd session |
| Reference Number: WP.29-172-08 |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 172nd WP.29 session (20-23 Jun 2017) |
| Document date: 16 Jun 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Adopted amendments to GRRF/2017/23 (UN R13, 13-H, 140) |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-39 |
|
Revised proposal, as approved during the 84th GRRF session, to enable activation of the ESC optical symbol in cases of a corrective steering function intervention when the CSF intervention is activated under the control of an ESC system. The aim is to avoid separate requirements for brake-actuated and steering-actuated vehicle stability functions (VSF) that would lead to two optical warnings where only one is necessary. This would enable use of the ESC intervention tell-tale for CSF steering intervention. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 22 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 79 - Requirements applicable to ACSF of Category C1 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-02 |
|
Working draft from the ACSF informal group to enable the approval of driver-initiated automated lane-change systems under UN R79. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for revised ToR and RoP for the IWG on ACSF |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-19 |
|
Proposal for extend the current mandate of the informal group until September 2018. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to the 02 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 79 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-22 |
|
This proposal supplements proposal GRRF/2017/23 which amends UN R13, R13H and R140, to allow the use of the ESC tell-tale to indicate the intervention on the steering angle of one or more wheels for the purpose of vehicle stability. The intention allow design options that avoid two optical warning signals (ESC flashing + constant CSF) during an ESC intervention. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA and OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for draft amendments to UN Regulation No. 79 - Emergency Steering Function (ESF) |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-23 |
|
Draft proposal to enable the approval of automated emergency steering systems intended to avoid or mitigate collisions. The proposal based on document ACSF-14-07 submitted by OICA and CLEPA which was discussed during the 14th meeting of the ACSF informal group. The square brackets indicates paragraphs which are still under discussion in the informal group. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA and OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Comments from Tesla, Inc. on GRRF-84-02 sent to the secretariat |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-24 |
|
Comments submitted to GRRF through the secretariat proposing amendments to the draft text on automated lane-change systems. |
| Submitted by: Tesla |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to GRRF-84-02 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-28 |
|
Proposal to allow adaptation of speed and distance calculations in accordance with national speed limits since some nations enforce maximum speed limits below the 130 km/h used as the basis for the proposals on automated lane-change systems. Japan expects to refine the proposal in order to address mutual recognition concerns inherent in such recourse to national requirements. Japan further proposes clarification of the approaching vehicle (motorcycle) test target pending development of uniform test target specifications. |
| Submitted by: Japan |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 20 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Lane Change Manoeuvre representation |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-29 |
|
Diagram illustrating the phases of a lane-change maneuver as envisioned by the Category C1 ACSF amendment to UN R79. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Lane Change Manoeuvre representation |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-30 |
|
Set of diagrams illustrating the phases and timing of the test procedure for an automated lane-change maneuver as envisioned by the draft amendment to introduce Category C1 ACSF into UN R79. These figures include the vehicle under test and approaching motorcycle speeds and distances under the lane-change phases, including timing and duration of each phase. |
| Submitted by: OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Draft consolidated amendments to Regulation No. 79 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-36 |
|
Draft amendment to UN R79, including provisions for emergency steering functions (ESF), Category C[1] ACSF for lane-change maneuvers, and updating of Complex Electronic Systems (CEL) Annex 6 provisions. This document was prepared during the 84th GRRF session for consideration during the special 85th GRRF scheduled to finalize a proposal for automated lane-change systems. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 22 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| ACSF lane-change speed-distance calculation tool |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-37 |
|
Speadsheet tool designed to calculate time and distance requirements based upon speeds of vehicle under test and test target motorcycle under the proposed procedures for evaluating Category C[1] ACSF automated lane-change systems. |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Annotated provisional agenda for the 85th GRRF session |
| Reference Number: GRRF/2017/26 |
| Meeting Sessions: 85th GRRF session (11 Dec 2017) |
| Document date: 02 Oct 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for an amendment to Regulation No. 79 - Remote Control Manoeuvring |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-09 |
|
Category G vehicles (defined in the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles (R.E.3)) have specific characteristics that enable them to achieve traction on, and to traverse over, off-road terrain that would defeat and/or damage conventional road vehicles. In some situations, it would be safer for the driver to be able to manoeuvre the vehicle from outside. This proposal seeks to permit remote manoeuvring capability provided that the vehicle is designed to operate in this environment and the off-road location is confirmed throughout the whole period that the function is in use. |
| Submitted by: UK |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for a decision on GRRF activities related to Automated Driving by WP.29 at its 172nd session |
| Reference Number: WP.29-172-08 |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 172nd WP.29 session (20-23 Jun 2017) |
| Document date: 16 Jun 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Adopted amendments to GRRF/2017/23 (UN R13, 13-H, 140) |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-39 |
|
Revised proposal, as approved during the 84th GRRF session, to enable activation of the ESC optical symbol in cases of a corrective steering function intervention when the CSF intervention is activated under the control of an ESC system. The aim is to avoid separate requirements for brake-actuated and steering-actuated vehicle stability functions (VSF) that would lead to two optical warnings where only one is necessary. This would enable use of the ESC intervention tell-tale for CSF steering intervention. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 22 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 79 - Requirements applicable to ACSF of Category C1 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-02 |
|
Working draft from the ACSF informal group to enable the approval of driver-initiated automated lane-change systems under UN R79. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for revised ToR and RoP for the IWG on ACSF |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-19 |
|
Proposal for extend the current mandate of the informal group until September 2018. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to the 02 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 79 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-22 |
|
This proposal supplements proposal GRRF/2017/23 which amends UN R13, R13H and R140, to allow the use of the ESC tell-tale to indicate the intervention on the steering angle of one or more wheels for the purpose of vehicle stability. The intention allow design options that avoid two optical warning signals (ESC flashing + constant CSF) during an ESC intervention. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA and OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for draft amendments to UN Regulation No. 79 - Emergency Steering Function (ESF) |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-23 |
|
Draft proposal to enable the approval of automated emergency steering systems intended to avoid or mitigate collisions. The proposal based on document ACSF-14-07 submitted by OICA and CLEPA which was discussed during the 14th meeting of the ACSF informal group. The square brackets indicates paragraphs which are still under discussion in the informal group. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA and OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Comments from Tesla, Inc. on GRRF-84-02 sent to the secretariat |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-24 |
|
Comments submitted to GRRF through the secretariat proposing amendments to the draft text on automated lane-change systems. |
| Submitted by: Tesla |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to GRRF-84-02 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-28 |
|
Proposal to allow adaptation of speed and distance calculations in accordance with national speed limits since some nations enforce maximum speed limits below the 130 km/h used as the basis for the proposals on automated lane-change systems. Japan expects to refine the proposal in order to address mutual recognition concerns inherent in such recourse to national requirements. Japan further proposes clarification of the approaching vehicle (motorcycle) test target pending development of uniform test target specifications. |
| Submitted by: Japan |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 20 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Lane Change Manoeuvre representation |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-29 |
|
Diagram illustrating the phases of a lane-change maneuver as envisioned by the Category C1 ACSF amendment to UN R79. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Lane Change Manoeuvre representation |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-30 |
|
Set of diagrams illustrating the phases and timing of the test procedure for an automated lane-change maneuver as envisioned by the draft amendment to introduce Category C1 ACSF into UN R79. These figures include the vehicle under test and approaching motorcycle speeds and distances under the lane-change phases, including timing and duration of each phase. |
| Submitted by: OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Draft consolidated amendments to Regulation No. 79 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-36 |
|
Draft amendment to UN R79, including provisions for emergency steering functions (ESF), Category C[1] ACSF for lane-change maneuvers, and updating of Complex Electronic Systems (CEL) Annex 6 provisions. This document was prepared during the 84th GRRF session for consideration during the special 85th GRRF scheduled to finalize a proposal for automated lane-change systems. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 22 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| ACSF lane-change speed-distance calculation tool |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-37 |
|
Speadsheet tool designed to calculate time and distance requirements based upon speeds of vehicle under test and test target motorcycle under the proposed procedures for evaluating Category C[1] ACSF automated lane-change systems. |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Annotated provisional agenda for the 85th GRRF session |
| Reference Number: GRRF/2017/26 |
| Meeting Sessions: 85th GRRF session (11 Dec 2017) |
| Document date: 02 Oct 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for an amendment to Regulation No. 79 - Remote Control Manoeuvring |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-09 |
|
Category G vehicles (defined in the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles (R.E.3)) have specific characteristics that enable them to achieve traction on, and to traverse over, off-road terrain that would defeat and/or damage conventional road vehicles. In some situations, it would be safer for the driver to be able to manoeuvre the vehicle from outside. This proposal seeks to permit remote manoeuvring capability provided that the vehicle is designed to operate in this environment and the off-road location is confirmed throughout the whole period that the function is in use. |
| Submitted by: UK |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for a decision on GRRF activities related to Automated Driving by WP.29 at its 172nd session |
| Reference Number: WP.29-172-08 |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 172nd WP.29 session (20-23 Jun 2017) |
| Document date: 16 Jun 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Adopted amendments to GRRF/2017/23 (UN R13, 13-H, 140) |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-39 |
|
Revised proposal, as approved during the 84th GRRF session, to enable activation of the ESC optical symbol in cases of a corrective steering function intervention when the CSF intervention is activated under the control of an ESC system. The aim is to avoid separate requirements for brake-actuated and steering-actuated vehicle stability functions (VSF) that would lead to two optical warnings where only one is necessary. This would enable use of the ESC intervention tell-tale for CSF steering intervention. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 22 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 79 - Requirements applicable to ACSF of Category C1 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-02 |
|
Working draft from the ACSF informal group to enable the approval of driver-initiated automated lane-change systems under UN R79. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for revised ToR and RoP for the IWG on ACSF |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-19 |
|
Proposal for extend the current mandate of the informal group until September 2018. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to the 02 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 79 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-22 |
|
This proposal supplements proposal GRRF/2017/23 which amends UN R13, R13H and R140, to allow the use of the ESC tell-tale to indicate the intervention on the steering angle of one or more wheels for the purpose of vehicle stability. The intention allow design options that avoid two optical warning signals (ESC flashing + constant CSF) during an ESC intervention. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA and OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for draft amendments to UN Regulation No. 79 - Emergency Steering Function (ESF) |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-23 |
|
Draft proposal to enable the approval of automated emergency steering systems intended to avoid or mitigate collisions. The proposal based on document ACSF-14-07 submitted by OICA and CLEPA which was discussed during the 14th meeting of the ACSF informal group. The square brackets indicates paragraphs which are still under discussion in the informal group. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA and OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Comments from Tesla, Inc. on GRRF-84-02 sent to the secretariat |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-24 |
|
Comments submitted to GRRF through the secretariat proposing amendments to the draft text on automated lane-change systems. |
| Submitted by: Tesla |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to GRRF-84-02 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-28 |
|
Proposal to allow adaptation of speed and distance calculations in accordance with national speed limits since some nations enforce maximum speed limits below the 130 km/h used as the basis for the proposals on automated lane-change systems. Japan expects to refine the proposal in order to address mutual recognition concerns inherent in such recourse to national requirements. Japan further proposes clarification of the approaching vehicle (motorcycle) test target pending development of uniform test target specifications. |
| Submitted by: Japan |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 20 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Lane Change Manoeuvre representation |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-29 |
|
Diagram illustrating the phases of a lane-change maneuver as envisioned by the Category C1 ACSF amendment to UN R79. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Lane Change Manoeuvre representation |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-30 |
|
Set of diagrams illustrating the phases and timing of the test procedure for an automated lane-change maneuver as envisioned by the draft amendment to introduce Category C1 ACSF into UN R79. These figures include the vehicle under test and approaching motorcycle speeds and distances under the lane-change phases, including timing and duration of each phase. |
| Submitted by: OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Draft consolidated amendments to Regulation No. 79 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-36 |
|
Draft amendment to UN R79, including provisions for emergency steering functions (ESF), Category C[1] ACSF for lane-change maneuvers, and updating of Complex Electronic Systems (CEL) Annex 6 provisions. This document was prepared during the 84th GRRF session for consideration during the special 85th GRRF scheduled to finalize a proposal for automated lane-change systems. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 22 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| ACSF lane-change speed-distance calculation tool |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-37 |
|
Speadsheet tool designed to calculate time and distance requirements based upon speeds of vehicle under test and test target motorcycle under the proposed procedures for evaluating Category C[1] ACSF automated lane-change systems. |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Annotated provisional agenda for the 85th GRRF session |
| Reference Number: GRRF/2017/26 |
| Meeting Sessions: 85th GRRF session (11 Dec 2017) |
| Document date: 02 Oct 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for an amendment to Regulation No. 79 - Remote Control Manoeuvring |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-09 |
|
Category G vehicles (defined in the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles (R.E.3)) have specific characteristics that enable them to achieve traction on, and to traverse over, off-road terrain that would defeat and/or damage conventional road vehicles. In some situations, it would be safer for the driver to be able to manoeuvre the vehicle from outside. This proposal seeks to permit remote manoeuvring capability provided that the vehicle is designed to operate in this environment and the off-road location is confirmed throughout the whole period that the function is in use. |
| Submitted by: UK |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for a decision on GRRF activities related to Automated Driving by WP.29 at its 172nd session |
| Reference Number: WP.29-172-08 |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 172nd WP.29 session (20-23 Jun 2017) |
| Document date: 16 Jun 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Adopted amendments to GRRF/2017/23 (UN R13, 13-H, 140) |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-39 |
|
Revised proposal, as approved during the 84th GRRF session, to enable activation of the ESC optical symbol in cases of a corrective steering function intervention when the CSF intervention is activated under the control of an ESC system. The aim is to avoid separate requirements for brake-actuated and steering-actuated vehicle stability functions (VSF) that would lead to two optical warnings where only one is necessary. This would enable use of the ESC intervention tell-tale for CSF steering intervention. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 22 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 79 - Requirements applicable to ACSF of Category C1 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-02 |
|
Working draft from the ACSF informal group to enable the approval of driver-initiated automated lane-change systems under UN R79. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for revised ToR and RoP for the IWG on ACSF |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-19 |
|
Proposal for extend the current mandate of the informal group until September 2018. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to the 02 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 79 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-22 |
|
This proposal supplements proposal GRRF/2017/23 which amends UN R13, R13H and R140, to allow the use of the ESC tell-tale to indicate the intervention on the steering angle of one or more wheels for the purpose of vehicle stability. The intention allow design options that avoid two optical warning signals (ESC flashing + constant CSF) during an ESC intervention. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA and OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for draft amendments to UN Regulation No. 79 - Emergency Steering Function (ESF) |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-23 |
|
Draft proposal to enable the approval of automated emergency steering systems intended to avoid or mitigate collisions. The proposal based on document ACSF-14-07 submitted by OICA and CLEPA which was discussed during the 14th meeting of the ACSF informal group. The square brackets indicates paragraphs which are still under discussion in the informal group. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA and OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Comments from Tesla, Inc. on GRRF-84-02 sent to the secretariat |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-24 |
|
Comments submitted to GRRF through the secretariat proposing amendments to the draft text on automated lane-change systems. |
| Submitted by: Tesla |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to GRRF-84-02 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-28 |
|
Proposal to allow adaptation of speed and distance calculations in accordance with national speed limits since some nations enforce maximum speed limits below the 130 km/h used as the basis for the proposals on automated lane-change systems. Japan expects to refine the proposal in order to address mutual recognition concerns inherent in such recourse to national requirements. Japan further proposes clarification of the approaching vehicle (motorcycle) test target pending development of uniform test target specifications. |
| Submitted by: Japan |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 20 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Lane Change Manoeuvre representation |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-29 |
|
Diagram illustrating the phases of a lane-change maneuver as envisioned by the Category C1 ACSF amendment to UN R79. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Lane Change Manoeuvre representation |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-30 |
|
Set of diagrams illustrating the phases and timing of the test procedure for an automated lane-change maneuver as envisioned by the draft amendment to introduce Category C1 ACSF into UN R79. These figures include the vehicle under test and approaching motorcycle speeds and distances under the lane-change phases, including timing and duration of each phase. |
| Submitted by: OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Draft consolidated amendments to Regulation No. 79 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-36 |
|
Draft amendment to UN R79, including provisions for emergency steering functions (ESF), Category C[1] ACSF for lane-change maneuvers, and updating of Complex Electronic Systems (CEL) Annex 6 provisions. This document was prepared during the 84th GRRF session for consideration during the special 85th GRRF scheduled to finalize a proposal for automated lane-change systems. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 22 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| ACSF lane-change speed-distance calculation tool |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-37 |
|
Speadsheet tool designed to calculate time and distance requirements based upon speeds of vehicle under test and test target motorcycle under the proposed procedures for evaluating Category C[1] ACSF automated lane-change systems. |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Annotated provisional agenda for the 85th GRRF session |
| Reference Number: GRRF/2017/26 |
| Meeting Sessions: 85th GRRF session (11 Dec 2017) |
| Document date: 02 Oct 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for an amendment to Regulation No. 79 - Remote Control Manoeuvring |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-09 |
|
Category G vehicles (defined in the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles (R.E.3)) have specific characteristics that enable them to achieve traction on, and to traverse over, off-road terrain that would defeat and/or damage conventional road vehicles. In some situations, it would be safer for the driver to be able to manoeuvre the vehicle from outside. This proposal seeks to permit remote manoeuvring capability provided that the vehicle is designed to operate in this environment and the off-road location is confirmed throughout the whole period that the function is in use. |
| Submitted by: UK |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for a decision on GRRF activities related to Automated Driving by WP.29 at its 172nd session |
| Reference Number: WP.29-172-08 |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 172nd WP.29 session (20-23 Jun 2017) |
| Document date: 16 Jun 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Adopted amendments to GRRF/2017/23 (UN R13, 13-H, 140) |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-39 |
|
Revised proposal, as approved during the 84th GRRF session, to enable activation of the ESC optical symbol in cases of a corrective steering function intervention when the CSF intervention is activated under the control of an ESC system. The aim is to avoid separate requirements for brake-actuated and steering-actuated vehicle stability functions (VSF) that would lead to two optical warnings where only one is necessary. This would enable use of the ESC intervention tell-tale for CSF steering intervention. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 22 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 79 - Requirements applicable to ACSF of Category C1 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-02 |
|
Working draft from the ACSF informal group to enable the approval of driver-initiated automated lane-change systems under UN R79. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for revised ToR and RoP for the IWG on ACSF |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-19 |
|
Proposal for extend the current mandate of the informal group until September 2018. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to the 02 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 79 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-22 |
|
This proposal supplements proposal GRRF/2017/23 which amends UN R13, R13H and R140, to allow the use of the ESC tell-tale to indicate the intervention on the steering angle of one or more wheels for the purpose of vehicle stability. The intention allow design options that avoid two optical warning signals (ESC flashing + constant CSF) during an ESC intervention. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA and OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for draft amendments to UN Regulation No. 79 - Emergency Steering Function (ESF) |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-23 |
|
Draft proposal to enable the approval of automated emergency steering systems intended to avoid or mitigate collisions. The proposal based on document ACSF-14-07 submitted by OICA and CLEPA which was discussed during the 14th meeting of the ACSF informal group. The square brackets indicates paragraphs which are still under discussion in the informal group. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA and OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Comments from Tesla, Inc. on GRRF-84-02 sent to the secretariat |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-24 |
|
Comments submitted to GRRF through the secretariat proposing amendments to the draft text on automated lane-change systems. |
| Submitted by: Tesla |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 19 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to GRRF-84-02 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-28 |
|
Proposal to allow adaptation of speed and distance calculations in accordance with national speed limits since some nations enforce maximum speed limits below the 130 km/h used as the basis for the proposals on automated lane-change systems. Japan expects to refine the proposal in order to address mutual recognition concerns inherent in such recourse to national requirements. Japan further proposes clarification of the approaching vehicle (motorcycle) test target pending development of uniform test target specifications. |
| Submitted by: Japan |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 20 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Lane Change Manoeuvre representation |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-29 |
|
Diagram illustrating the phases of a lane-change maneuver as envisioned by the Category C1 ACSF amendment to UN R79. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Lane Change Manoeuvre representation |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-30 |
|
Set of diagrams illustrating the phases and timing of the test procedure for an automated lane-change maneuver as envisioned by the draft amendment to introduce Category C1 ACSF into UN R79. These figures include the vehicle under test and approaching motorcycle speeds and distances under the lane-change phases, including timing and duration of each phase. |
| Submitted by: OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Draft consolidated amendments to Regulation No. 79 |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-36 |
|
Draft amendment to UN R79, including provisions for emergency steering functions (ESF), Category C[1] ACSF for lane-change maneuvers, and updating of Complex Electronic Systems (CEL) Annex 6 provisions. This document was prepared during the 84th GRRF session for consideration during the special 85th GRRF scheduled to finalize a proposal for automated lane-change systems. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 22 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| ACSF lane-change speed-distance calculation tool |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-37 |
|
Speadsheet tool designed to calculate time and distance requirements based upon speeds of vehicle under test and test target motorcycle under the proposed procedures for evaluating Category C[1] ACSF automated lane-change systems. |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 21 Sep 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Annotated provisional agenda for the 85th GRRF session |
| Reference Number: GRRF/2017/26 |
| Meeting Sessions: 85th GRRF session (11 Dec 2017) |
| Document date: 02 Oct 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for an amendment to Regulation No. 79 - Remote Control Manoeuvring |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-09 |
|
Category G vehicles (defined in the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles (R.E.3)) have specific characteristics that enable them to achieve traction on, and to traverse over, off-road terrain that would defeat and/or damage conventional road vehicles. In some situations, it would be safer for the driver to be able to manoeuvre the vehicle from outside. This proposal seeks to permit remote manoeuvring capability provided that the vehicle is designed to operate in this environment and the off-road location is confirmed throughout the whole period that the function is in use. |
| Submitted by: UK |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 15 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for a decision on GRRF activities related to Automated Driving by WP.29 at its 172nd session |
| Reference Number: WP.29-172-08 |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 172nd WP.29 session (20-23 Jun 2017) |
| Document date: 16 Jun 17 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Adopted amendments to GRRF/2017/23 (UN R13, 13-H, 140) |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-39 |
|
Revised proposal, as approved during the 84th GRRF session, to enable activation of the ESC optical symbol in cases of a corrective steering function intervention when the CSF intervention is activated under the control of an ESC system. The aim is to avoid separate requirements for brake-actuated and steering-actuated vehicle stability functions (VSF) that would lead to two optical warnings where only one is necessary. This would enable use of the ESC intervention tell-tale for CSF steering intervention. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 22 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| GRRF-84-02 | Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 79 - Requirements applicable to ACSF of Category C1 | |
| GRRF-84-09 | Proposal for an amendment to Regulation No. 79 - Remote Control Manoeuvring | |
| GRRF-84-19 | Proposal for revised ToR and RoP for the IWG on ACSF | |
| GRRF-84-19 | Proposal for revised ToR and RoP for the IWG on ACSF | |
| GRRF-84-19 | Proposal for revised ToR and RoP for the IWG on ACSF | |
| GRRF-84-22 | Proposal for amendments to the 02 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 79 | |
| GRRF-84-23 | Proposal for draft amendments to UN Regulation No. 79 - Emergency Steering Function (ESF) | |
| GRRF-84-23 | Proposal for draft amendments to UN Regulation No. 79 - Emergency Steering Function (ESF) | |
| GRRF-84-24 | Comments from Tesla, Inc. on GRRF-84-02 sent to the secretariat | |
| GRRF-84-28 | Proposal for amendments to GRRF-84-02 | |
| GRRF-84-29 | Lane Change Manoeuvre representation | |
| GRRF-84-30 | Lane Change Manoeuvre representation | |
| GRRF-84-36 | Draft consolidated amendments to Regulation No. 79 | |
| GRRF-84-36 | Draft consolidated amendments to Regulation No. 79 | |
| GRRF-84-37 | ACSF lane-change speed-distance calculation tool | |
| GRRF-84-39 | Adopted amendments to GRRF/2017/23 (UN R13, 13-H, 140) | |
| GRRF/2017/26 | Annotated provisional agenda for the 85th GRRF session | |
| WP.29-172-08 | Proposal for a decision on GRRF activities related to Automated Driving by WP.29 at its 172nd session |