Hotspot means a life cycle stage whose contribution to an impact category exceeds even distribution across all stages, or all stages collectively contributing more than fifty percent to any impact category. In vehicle LCA guidelines for Global Warming Potential, hotspots refer only to the production phase and are related to parts or components representing minimum twenty percent of Global Warming Potential of the production phase. Level three requires company-specific data for at least one hotspot material or component, with primary data preferred and secondary data traceable and based on field survey data when primary data unavailable.

A-LCA SG2 comments. Results of A-LCA based on this Resolution shall be completely and accurately reported without bias in accordance with paragraph 6 “Reporting” of ISO 14040: 2006. Results, data, methods, assumptions and limitations described in the background report shall be transparent and presented in sufficient detail to allow readers, reviewers, verifiers and the targeted audience to comprehend the determination process and its complexities and trade-offs inherent in the LCA. The background report is the basis for critical review and verification for all levels of the level concept. When results of the A-LCA are available to the public, required information shall be described within the background report and in a summary report, including general information, applicable methodology, vehicle configuration, geographic considerations, results, data sources and weighting factors, and reviewer or verifier signature.

Section 10 establishes that verification shall be conducted to confirm A-LCA results comply with the Resolution while ensuring transparency and consistency. For levels 1, 2, 3 and 4, a critical review shall be conducted according to ISO 14040:2006 paragraph 7 with additional focus on compliance. The verification statement shall be available on published A-LCA study reports. Verification covers methodology applied, input data used, interpretation of results, interpretation of robustness, reporting in background reports, and checking numerical calculation results. For levels 1 and 2, LCA practitioners should decide whether to perform internal or external critical review; for levels 3 and 4, external third-party review is mandatory. For levels 3 and 4, verification shall be conducted at OEM level and shall include definition of the LCA group and choice of representative vehicle. Verification at OEM level shall build on verifications of suppliers’ input data without re-verifying these data. The OEM’s LCA calculation system verification shall include data collection, internal sources, assumptions, calculation processes and tools applied. In case an LCA calculation system is verified and verification remains valid, no reverification is required for subsequent LCA studies based on that verified system. OEMs and suppliers shall make system verification statements available to contracting parties upon request.

Section 7.9 establishes a representative vehicle (RV) methodology for Automotive Life Cycle Assessment. The RV is a benchmark vehicle reflecting typical characteristics of a defined group of vehicles to reduce administrative burden while ensuring comparability. RV selection excludes high-performance, off-road, and special-purpose variants, then selects based on highest technical mass among remaining vehicles within an LCA group defined by vehicle structure family, powertrain type, and production region. Upstream, downstream, and end-of-life emission factors are calculated from the RV and applied to declared vehicles within the same LCA group. Traction batteries and hydrogen storage vessels are calculated separately.

Proposal to amend Annex B4, para. 4.2.1.1.1. to specify vehicle H selection without interpolation based on highest cycle energy demand and wheel selection criteria, amend para. 4.2.1.1.2. to permit optional interpolation method using two test vehicles or one vehicle tested twice with specified configurations, amend para. 4.2.1.5. to specify operation of movable aerodynamic body parts during road load determination, amend para. 4.2.2.1. to establish tyre rolling resistance measurement according to UN R117 02 series amendments and introduce Table A4/2 with rolling resistance classes and coefficients for C1, C2 and C3 tyres, amend para. 4.3.1.4.3. to establish rejection criteria for road load measurements not exceeding one-third of total measurement pairs and data evaluation procedures, amend para. 6. heading to include optional procedures for road load determination and calculation, amend para. 6.8. to permit optional measurement of friction differences on component or suitable dynamometer, add new paras. 6.9. to 6.10.1.1. to establish component dynamometer test procedures and optional calculation method for road load based on base vehicle measurement and technical vehicle parameters, and amend Annex B7 paras. 3.2.3.2.2.2.2. and 3.2.3.2.2.4. to reference Table A4/2 rolling resistance classes and permit optional calculation using actual tyre rolling resistance values.

Proposal to amend UN R154 road load determination procedures by introducing an optional calculation method for road load coefficients based on component dynamometer measurements from two reference vehicles, establishing boundary conditions permitting up to 300 kg vehicle weight difference and unlimited aerodynamic configuration variation, and allowing optional calculation of the linear coefficient f₁ using the mean value of measurements from both vehicles to reduce measurement uncertainties.

Devices for monitoring on-board vehicle consumption of fuel and/or electric energy shall determine and store lifetime values of fuel consumed, distance travelled, and energy parameters specified in Appendix 5. Type-approval requires testing per Table A according to vehicle category and fuel type, including Type 1 emissions tests, evaporative emissions tests, durability, OBD checks, and OBFCM accuracy verification. Manufacturers must ensure OBFCM accuracy between −0.05 and +0.05 calculated using specified formulae comparing WLTP-determined and OBFCM-measured consumption. Conformity of production requires periodic testing and audits. Lifetime counter values shall be preserved from 1 January 2029 for new vehicle types; from 1 January 2030, type approvals for non-compliant vehicles shall not be accepted. OBFCM devices must provide standardised, unrestricted access to information via specified ISO and SAE standards.

Proposal to introduce new regional requirements from Contracting Parties, in particular from Euro 7 in the EU, including new particle number (PN10) provisions, a new SHED limit for evaporative emissions, updated On-board Fuel Consumption Monitoring provisions, and new annexes with requirements relating to in-vehicle battery durability and a new test for range of Pure Electric Vehicles at low temperatures for UN R154 (Worldwide harmonized Light vehicles Test Procedures (WLTP)).

Proposal to establish a new Mutual Resolution concerning Automotive Life Cycle Assessment (A-LCA) to provide an internationally harmonised methodology for determining the carbon footprint of light-duty vehicles across all life cycle stages—material production, parts production and vehicle assembly, use, and end-of-life—considering energy use pathways from production to disposal, with a Level Concept offering four detail levels depending on data availability and study purpose, including definitions, abbreviations, system boundaries, data collection requirements, energy modelling approaches for electricity and fuels, allocation rules, waste treatment and recycling modelling using Circular Footprint Formula or Recycled Content Method, maintenance assessment, and verification procedures. The methodology applies to light-duty vehicles, uses a functional unit of 1 passenger per kilometre over vehicle lifetime, includes service life values from official data by Contracting Parties or peer-reviewed reports, accounts for discrepancy and deterioration factors in use phase calculations, addresses traction battery and fuel cell deterioration, specifies reporting requirements for all life cycle stages including biogenic emissions separately, and requires external third-party verification for Level 3 and Level 4 studies based on GRPE/86/Rev.1 through the Working Party on Pollution and Energy at its 93rd session.

OICA comments on SG4 Use Phase inputs to GRPE/2025/17 concern vehicle service life definitions, discrepancy and deterioration factors for real-world energy consumption, battery state-of-health degradation for off-vehicle charging hybrid electric vehicles, hydrogen and methane leakage quantification, refrigerant emissions from air conditioning systems, and maintenance parts replacement methodologies. OICA advocates for regional flexibility in service life determination, OEM-specific data for discrepancy factors at Level 4, standardized approaches for battery and fuel cell deterioration, and structured hierarchies for assessing maintenance part replacements over vehicle operational lifetime.

Proposal to amend Annex B4, para. 6.2.1. to specify that three vehicles selected by the responsible authority shall cover the range of vehicles planned to be measured, and that each change of range requires new selection, but original measurements can be re-used if a vehicle is reselected, and amend para. 6.2.4. to establish approval criteria requiring the difference in cycle energy between wind tunnel method and coastdown method to be within 0.05 for each of three vehicles and within 0.02 for arithmetic average, to require approval recording, to permit facility use for two years with extension every two years upon manufacturer evidence of modifications, measurement results at three-month intervals meeting repeatability and force measurement accuracy requirements, and to require separate approval for each roller chassis dynamometer or moving belt and wind tunnel combination and each combination of wind speeds used.

Proposal to amend UN R83 by deleting Annex 1, paragraph 3.4.3. and renumbering paragraphs 3.4.3.1., 3.4.3.1.1., 3.4.3.1.2. and 3.4.3.1.3. to read 3.4.3., 3.4.3.1., 3.4.3.2. and 3.4.3.3., and deleting Annex 2, paragraph 1.9.2. The concept of “Operating Mode Switch” has been removed from the Regulation and these two paragraphs were omitted from this removal and should be deleted from both the manufacturer’s information document and the addendum to the approval certificate.