3. (c) Clarifications
|
8. The Chair of GRRF recalled the purpose of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2013/13, adopted during the seventy-fifth GRRF session. The document remained on the agenda of GRRF, pending submission to the World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations (WP.29) and the Administrative Committee of the 1958 Agreement (AC.1) of the adopted text for Regulation No. 89 (Speed limitation devices).
|
GRRF/2013/13 | Proposal for collective amendments - Regulation Nos. 13, 13-H, 79, 89, and the LDWS and AEBS regulations
|
Proposal for collective amendments - Regulation Nos. 13, 13-H, 79, 89, and the LDWS and AEBS regulations
|
|
Reference Number: GRRF/2013/13
|
|
Proposal for collective amendments of amendments to Regulations Nos. 13 (Heavy vehicle braking), 13-H (Brakes of M1 and N1 vehicles), 79 (Steering equipment) and 89 (Speed limitation devices) and the new Regulations on LDWS and AEBS to clarify the references to Regulation No. 10 into the UN Regulations mentioned above.
|
|
Submitted by: OICA and CLEPA
|
|
Meeting Sessions: 75th GRRF session (17-19
Sep 2013)
|
|
Document date: 06 Jul 13
|
|
Document status: Superseded
|
|
Relevant to
|
|
View full document file for more information
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. GRRF didn’t receive any new information about the activities of the Special Interest Group (SIG) of experts dealing with the provisions of Annex 14 of Regulation No. 13.
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. The expert from the Russian Federation presented ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2016/25 proposing the alignment of the Russian text with the French and English versions. GRRF agreed with the proposal and requested the secretariat to submit it as draft Corrigendum to Revision 8 of Regulation No. 13 (Heavy vehicle Braking) to WP.29 and AC.1 at their March 2017 sessions.
|
GRRF/2016/25 | Proposal for draft Corrigendum to Revision 8 of Regulation No. 13
|
Proposal for draft Corrigendum to Revision 8 of Regulation No. 13
|
|
Reference Number: GRRF/2016/25
|
|
The proposal is aimed at ensuring that the English and Russian texts are equivalent. In the English text, which is the original, in paragraph 2.2.27 of Annex 12 the word “travel” is used. The corresponding word in Russian language should be “ход”. The original text was mistranslated into Russian.
|
|
Submitted by: Russia
|
|
Meeting Sessions: 82nd GRRF session (20-23
Sep 2016)
|
|
Document date: 05 Jul 16
|
|
Document status: Superseded
|
|
Relevant to
|
|
View full document file for more information
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. The expert from the Netherlands, recalling the initial discussion at WP.29, presented WP.29-168-16 proposing deletions in Annex 5 of Regulation No. 13. The expert from CLEPA provided an historical explanation about the development of the Regulation and a justification for a deletion of para. 2.2.1. He explained that the proposed deletion of para. 2.3.2. was not justified. GRRF agreed with the explanations provided and agreed to discuss this proposal at its next session on the basis of a revised proposal that the expert from the Netherlands volunteered to prepare.
|
WP.29-168-16 | Proposal from WP.15 to amend Regulation No. 13
|
Proposal from WP.15 to amend Regulation No. 13
|
|
Reference Number: WP.29-168-16
|
|
Proposal from the Working Party on Dangerous Goods to delete paragraph 2.2.1 and 2.3.2 in Annex 5 of Regulation No. 13 permitting the use of an endurance braking system on a trailer to compensate for insufficient performance of the endurance braking system of the motor vehicles. Such systems have been prohibited by WP.15 such that alignment of the vehicle technical requirements is needed.
|
|
Meeting Sessions: 168th WP.29 session (8-11
Mar 2016)
|
|
Document date: 08 Mar 16
|
|
Relevant to
|
|
View full document file for more information
|
|
|
|
|
|
12. The expert from France introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2016/26 proposing amendments to Annex 12 of Regulation No. 13. The proposal received a general support. The expert from Germany noted that some modifications of editorial nature might be necessary. GRRF agreed to revisit this item at its next session, on the basis of a revised proposal, that the experts from France and Germany volunteered to prepare.
|
GRRF/2016/26 | Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 13
|
Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 13
|
|
Reference Number: GRRF/2016/26
|
|
Proposal to clarify paragraph 8.1.2. The paragraph aimed to verify that the compensator can accept a difference of the travel when one brake operates in forward direction and the other in rearward direction with a margin of twenty per cent.
|
|
Submitted by: France
|
|
Meeting Sessions: 82nd GRRF session (20-23
Sep 2016)
|
|
Document date: 05 Jul 16
|
|
Document status: Superseded
|
|
Relevant to
|
|
View full document file for more information
|
|
|
|
|
|
13. The expert from CLEPA presented ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2016/27, as amended by GRRF-82-03. GRRF supported the aim of this proposal. The proposal received several comments of editorial nature. GRRF agreed to keep both documents on the agenda of the next GRRF session.
|
GRRF/2016/27 | Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 13
|
Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 13
|
|
Reference Number: GRRF/2016/27
|
|
UN R13 allows for the exemption of certain vehicles from the requirement for electronic stability controls. This proposal seeks to clarify the scope of the exemptions to include any special purpose vehicle with a non-standard chassis. The change was prompted by a modified vehicle where use of ESC was not feasible, but where the current UN R13 language left doubt as to whether the ESC requirement was applicable. This revised proposal takes into account comments received during the February 2016 GRRF session.
|
|
Submitted by: CLEPA
|
|
Meeting Sessions: 82nd GRRF session (20-23
Sep 2016)
|
|
Document date: 05 Jul 16
|
|
Document status: Superseded
|
|
Relevant to
|
|
View full document file for more information
|
GRRF-82-03 | Proposal for amendments to Regulations No. 13
|
Proposal for amendments to Regulations No. 13
|
|
Reference Number: GRRF-82-03
|
|
UN R13 allows for the exemption of certain vehicles from the requirement for electronic stability controls. This proposal seeks to clarify the scope of the exemptions to include any special purpose vehicle with a non-standard chassis. The change was prompted by a modified vehicle where use of ESC was not feasible, but where the current UN R13 language left doubt as to whether the ESC requirement was applicable. This revised proposal takes into account comments received during the February 2016 GRRF session.
|
|
Submitted by: CLEPA
|
|
Meeting Sessions: 82nd GRRF session (20-23
Sep 2016)
|
|
Document date: 01 Sep 16
|
|
Document status: Superseded
|
|
Relevant to
|
|
View full document file for more information
|
|
|
|
|