| Amendments to the Justification part in document GRRF/2017/12 (UN R13) |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-04 |
|
Proposal to clarify the intent and rationale behind the proposal to simplify the verification of sufficient movement on the balancer without having to take measurements underneath the trailer in a potentially unsafe position. |
| Submitted by: France and Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 11 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
| Relevant to: UN Regulation No. 13 | Heavy-Duty Vehicle Braking |
| Click here to view the full document file |
| Adopted amendments to GRRF/2017/23 (UN R13, 13-H, 140) |
| Reference Number: GRRF-84-39 |
|
Revised proposal, as approved during the 84th GRRF session, to enable activation of the ESC optical symbol in cases of a corrective steering function intervention when the CSF intervention is activated under the control of an ESC system. The aim is to avoid separate requirements for brake-actuated and steering-actuated vehicle stability functions (VSF) that would lead to two optical warnings where only one is necessary. This would enable use of the ESC intervention tell-tale for CSF steering intervention. |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 22 Sep 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
| Relevant to: UN Regulation No. 13 | Heavy-Duty Vehicle Braking, UN Regulation No. 13-H | Light-Duty Vehicle Braking, UN Regulation No. 79 | Steering Equipment, and UN Regulation No. 140 | Electronic Stability Control Systems |
| Click here to view the full document file |
| Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 13 |
| Reference Number: GRRF/2017/11 |
|
UN R13 allows for the exemption of certain vehicles from the requirement for electronic stability controls (footnote 12). This proposal (following proposals GRRF/2016/27 as amended by GRRF-82-03 and proposal GRRF-83-31) seeks to clarify the scope of the exemptions to include any special purpose vehicle with a non-standard chassis. The change was prompted by a modified vehicle where use of ESC was not feasible, but where the current UN R13 language left doubt as to whether the ESC requirement was applicable. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 05 Jul 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
| Relevant to: UN Regulation No. 13 | Heavy-Duty Vehicle Braking |
| Click here to view the full document file |
| Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 13 |
| Reference Number: GRRF/2017/12 |
|
Proposal to simplify the verification of the sufficient movement on the balancer without having to take measurements underneath the trailer in a potentially unsafe position. |
| Submitted by: France and Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 07 Jul 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
| Relevant to: UN Regulation No. 13 | Heavy-Duty Vehicle Braking |
| Click here to view the full document file |
| Proposal for amendments to Regulations Nos. 13, 13-H and 140 |
| Reference Number: GRRF/2017/23 |
|
Revised proposal pursuant to GRRF discussions to enable activation of the ESC optical symbol in cases of a corrective steering function intervention when the CSF intervention is activated under the control of an ESC system. The aim is to avoid separate requirements for brake-actuated and steering-actuated vehicle stability functions (VSF) that would lead to two optical warnings where only one is necessary. This would enable use of the ESC intervention tell-tale for CSF steering intervention. |
| Submitted by: OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 84th GRRF session (19-22 Sep 2017) |
| Document date: 06 Jul 17 |
| Document status: Superseded |
| Relevant to: UN Regulation No. 13 | Heavy-Duty Vehicle Braking, UN Regulation No. 13-H | Light-Duty Vehicle Braking, and UN Regulation No. 140 | Electronic Stability Control Systems |
| Click here to view the full document file |
No matching documents.