| previous agenda item | next agenda item |
|
Main content of document from (OICA/CLEPA): The delegates discussed about the values of the timing for Warning, Transition time and Minimal risk manoeuvre. The timing for returning the driving task back to the driver in case of end of the “ACSF-road”, exit from this road or bringing the driver back, if it seems, that he is no more in the situation to resume control in time, are uncritical as the ACSF controlled vehicle is working perfectly. More critical is the timing in case of a sudden, unexpected event and in case of a failure in the system. The outcome of the discussion is reflected in the new generated document: ACSF-04-18, which is shown below and in an update of the OICA/CLEPA document ACSF-04-12-Rev1. |
ACSF-04-12 | OICA-CLEPA input concerning automated steering transition demand and minimum risk maneouvre provisions
ACSF-04-12/Rev.1 | Revised OICA-CLEPA input concerning automated steering transition demand and minimum risk maneouvre provisions
ACSF-04-18 | Outcome of the ACSF informal group discussion on warning/transition times for Category E automated steering systems
|