ACSF-04-02 | Draft agenda for the 4th ACSF informal group session

ACSF-03-17/Rev.2 | Final report of the 3rd ACSF informal group session

ACSF-04-03 | French proposal for UN R79 based upon document ACSF-03-16 Comments on the draft amendment to UN R79 addressing automated steering as it stood at the end of the third ACSF informal group session. This document also raises links to rear vision (UN R46), AEBS (UN R131), and park assist systems.

GRRF-79-31 | Guidance to GRs concerning Automated Driving Technology Status of ITS/AD Informal Group consideration of guidance for WP.29 working parties on the regulation of automated driving technologies, especially concerning automatically commanded steering under UN R79.

GRRF-79-31/Add.1 | CLEPA position on draft guidance document concerning automated driving technologies

ACSF-04-15 | Results of NTSEL study on ACSF transition time Presentation of results from Japan's NTSEL research into the time required for the driver to transition from automated to manual steering modes and on driver/vehicle behavior throughout the transition period under various traffic scenarios.

ACSF-04-14 | Toyota Motor survey on the transition time from ACSF to Manual Driving

ACSF-04-12 | OICA-CLEPA input concerning automated steering transition demand and minimum risk maneouvre provisions

ACSF-04-12/Rev.1 | Revised OICA-CLEPA input concerning automated steering transition demand and minimum risk maneouvre provisions

ACSF-04-18 | Outcome of the ACSF informal group discussion on warning/transition times for Category E automated steering systems Summary of consensus reached during the 4th ACSF informal group session for a 4 second transition time under normal operating conditions and immediate warning under emergency conditions.

ACSF-04-05 | Safety Distances and Object Classifications for ACSF

ACSF-04-04 | Protective Braking for ACSF Presentation proposing a requirement for defensive braking on vehicles equipped with ACSF because automated steering may result in driver inattention and therefore require compensating environment monitoring and automatic braking. This type of "protective braking" is viewed as a different order of braking than AEBS given that the principle involves maintaining of distances and avoiding accidents at speed rather than as an emergency or abrupt braking.

ACSF-03-05 | Tool to calculate safety distances based upon vehicle speed Spreadsheet tool to calculate safety distances between vehicles as a function of speed and required braking distances.

ACSF-04-06 | ACSF: Lane-change test

ACSF-04-07 | ACSF: Minimum risk maneuvers (MRM) Presentation on the concept of a minimum risk maneuver boundaries to define acceptable parameters for system-to-driver transition demands and system responses in cases of where the driver does not react.

ACSF-04-17 | Germany proposal for ACSF amendments to UN R79 based upon document ACSF-03-16

ACSF-03-16 | Final draft of the 3rd ACSF informal group session for the amendment of UN R79

ACSF-03-05 | Tool to calculate safety distances based upon vehicle speed Spreadsheet tool to calculate safety distances between vehicles as a function of speed and required braking distances.

ACSF-04-12/Rev.1 | Revised OICA-CLEPA input concerning automated steering transition demand and minimum risk maneouvre provisions

ACSF-04-18 | Outcome of the ACSF informal group discussion on warning/transition times for Category E automated steering systems Summary of consensus reached during the 4th ACSF informal group session for a 4 second transition time under normal operating conditions and immediate warning under emergency conditions.

ACSF-04-11 | Netherlands comments and proposals for Tests I and II under the draft ACSF amendments to UN R79

ACSF-04-09 | Korea proposal for ACSF amendments to UN R79 based upon document ACSF-03-16

ACSF-03-16 | Final draft of the 3rd ACSF informal group session for the amendment of UN R79

ITS/AD-07-02 | Major results and action items of the 6th ITS/AD informal group meeting

ACSF-04-13 | OICA-CLEPA comments on the draft ACSF amendment to UN R79 (based on document ACSF-03-16)

ACSF-03-16 | Final draft of the 3rd ACSF informal group session for the amendment of UN R79

ACSF-04-13 | OICA-CLEPA comments on the draft ACSF amendment to UN R79 (based on document ACSF-03-16)

ACSF-04-20 | Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 79 to include ACSF > 10 km/h Draft amendment to enable the approval of automated steering systems (e.g., lane-keeping/lane-changing assistance) for use at speeds above 10 km/h pursuant to discussions held during the 4th ACSF informal group session.

ACSF-04-12/Rev.1 | Revised OICA-CLEPA input concerning automated steering transition demand and minimum risk maneouvre provisions

ACSF-04-18 | Outcome of the ACSF informal group discussion on warning/transition times for Category E automated steering systems Summary of consensus reached during the 4th ACSF informal group session for a 4 second transition time under normal operating conditions and immediate warning under emergency conditions.

ACSF-04-20 | Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 79 to include ACSF > 10 km/h Draft amendment to enable the approval of automated steering systems (e.g., lane-keeping/lane-changing assistance) for use at speeds above 10 km/h pursuant to discussions held during the 4th ACSF informal group session.

ACSF-04-06 | ACSF: Lane-change test

ACSF-04-09 | Korea proposal for ACSF amendments to UN R79 based upon document ACSF-03-16

ACSF-04-13 | OICA-CLEPA comments on the draft ACSF amendment to UN R79 (based on document ACSF-03-16)

ACSF-04-17 | Germany proposal for ACSF amendments to UN R79 based upon document ACSF-03-16

ACSF-04-18 | Outcome of the ACSF informal group discussion on warning/transition times for Category E automated steering systems Summary of consensus reached during the 4th ACSF informal group session for a 4 second transition time under normal operating conditions and immediate warning under emergency conditions.