The agenda includes Y-category regulatory framework new for N₁, Y-category pedestrian protection UN R127, UN R42 from informal document GRSP-79-11, UN R134 Y-category exclusion, any other business, and dates for next meetings on 5 October, November week 47, 24 November or 1 December, and 7-11 December at GRSP-80.

Proposal for a new UN Regulation on crashworthiness of vehicles of category N₁Y with regard to protection of fuel system integrity, protection against electrical shock, and vehicle crash compatibility in the event of frontal, rear-end, and lateral collision. The proposal would establish frontal impact requirements based on UN R94 or UN R137 at manufacturer’s choice in agreement with the designated technical service, lateral impact requirements based on UN R95 without side pole impact test, and rear impact requirements based on UN R153 without modification. Vehicles with maximum design speed not exceeding the applicable impact speed shall be tested at their maximum design speed and comply with post-impact requirements. Fuel system integrity, electrical shock protection from rechargeable energy storage systems, and crash compatibility requirements apply. Crash Compatibility Criterion shall not exceed 40 g and Crash Compatibility Value shall not exceed 100 g×tonne, determined according to Annex 3. Vehicles of category N₁Y derived from category X vehicles complying with UN R94 (05 series amendments supplement 2), UN R95 (06 series amendments supplement 2), UN R137 (04 series amendments supplement 1), and UN R153 (01 series amendments supplement 1) are deemed to meet all requirements.

Updated document with in-session comments.

Proposal, updated with in session comments, to amend Footnote 1 to reference document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/78/Rev.8, amend para. 6.1.5. to clarify that the exemption for sensors being part of driver assistance systems does not apply to automated driving systems, remove non-exhaustive examples of sensors, replace “disoriented” with “misaligned”, and align terminology to “driver assistance systems”. The exemption for driver assistance systems is retained because their failure does not prevent manual vehicle operation, whereas automated driving systems’ perception equipment forms part of the driving function, and damage to sensing devices may prevent vehicle operation contrary to Regulation No. 42’s objective.

Proposal to insert a new Introduction section containing provisions for vehicles of categories X and Y, amend the Scope to include vehicles of categories X and Y with specific exemptions based on the “R” point or front structural geometry, amend definitions of “Bonnet rear reference line,” “Front structure,” “Normal ride attitude,” “Side reference line,” “Windscreen test area,” and “Cowl monitoring area” to address vehicles of categories X and Y, and amend paragraph 5.3.1.2. regarding Automated Riding Height Suspension System engagement conditions. Changes compared to document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2026/53 are indicated by red markup.

Draft text for a new UN Regulation on crashworthiness of vehicles of category N₁Y, including comments from France:

• Amend paragraphs 0.2.1., 2.4., 5.1., 5.2., 6.3.1., and Annex 3,
• Insert paragraphs 2.5., 2.6., 5.2.4., 5.2.4.1., 5.2.4.2., 5.2.4.3., 6.3.3., and 6.3.3.1.,
• Update annexes with test procedures for frontal, lateral, and rear-end collision and hydrogen fuel system integrity assessment post-crash for vehicles of category N₁Y, to ensure protection of fuel system integrity, protection against electrical shock from rechargeable energy storage systems, and vehicle crash compatibility in frontal, rear-end, and lateral collisions.

This Regulation establishes uniform provisions for crashworthiness approval of N₁Y vehicles regarding fuel system integrity, electrical shock protection, and crash compatibility during frontal, rear, and lateral collisions. The provisions for frontal impact are based on UN R94 or UN R137 per manufacturer choice with Technical Service agreement; lateral impact provisions are based on UN R95; rear impact provisions are based on UN R153. Vehicles with maximum design speeds not exceeding applicable impact speeds shall be tested at their maximum design speed and comply with post-impact requirements. Crash Compatibility Criterion shall not exceed 40–45 g and Crash Compatibility Value shall not exceed 100–120 g×tonne. For vehicles derived from types already approved under UN R94, UN R137, UN R95, or UN R153, previous test results may be used if mass increases do not exceed 8 per cent.

Work in progress clean draft proposal to establish a new UN Regulation on crashworthiness of vehicles of category N₁Y with regard to protection of fuel system integrity, protection against electrical shock and vehicle crash compatibility in the event of frontal, rear-end and lateral collision. The regulation applies to vehicles of category N₁Y and specifies test procedures for frontal, lateral and rear-end collisions based on UN R94, UN R95, UN R137 and UN R153. Requirements include fuel system integrity with no more than slight leakage or continuous leakage not exceeding 30 g/min, hydrogen leakage rate not exceeding 118 NL per minute, protection against electrical shock through absence of high voltage, low electrical energy, physical protection or isolation resistance, electrolyte leakage limits, REESS retention and fire hazard prevention, and crash compatibility criteria with Crash Compatibility Criterion not exceeding 40–45 g and Crash Compatibility Value not exceeding 100–120 gt.

Proposal to:

• insert a new paragraph 0 introducing the amendment to account for vehicles of categories X and Y, stating that the Regulation was originally drafted for vehicles with a driver and manual driving controls and is being extended to vehicles without a driver and without manual driving controls, that in manual driving mode no special provisions apply to vehicles equipped with an Automated Driving System other than vehicles of categories X and Y, and that vehicles of category Y are exempted based on front structure geometry rather than driver “R” point position
• amend paragraph 1.2 to provide that for vehicles of category X, the “R” point of the most forward passenger seat shall be taken instead of the R-point of the driver’s seat
• amend paragraph 1.3 to provide that for vehicles of category X, the “R” point of the most forward passenger seat shall be taken instead of the R-point of the driver’s seat
• amend paragraph 1.4 to delete the statement that this Regulation does not apply to vehicles of category Y and instead provide that vehicles of category N1Y where a specified equation is fulfilled are exempted
• amend paragraph 2.8 to revise the definition of “Bonnet rear reference line” and provide that for vehicles of category Y without a windscreen, the BRRL is defined as the geometric trace of the most rearward points of contact between the sphere and the front structure as it is traversed across the vehicle’s rearward edge
• amend paragraph 2.22 to provide that for vehicles of categories X and Y, automated driving sensors that are essential for the vehicle’s operation and cannot be stowed during driving should be considered part of the “Front structure”
• amend paragraph 2.29 to provide that for vehicles of category X, two passenger masses are placed on the front seats instead of driver and one passenger masses, and for vehicles of category Y, no occupant mass is added
• amend paragraph 2.32 to provide that for vehicles of category Y where A-pillars are non-existent, side reference lines also define the lateral limits for the total test area
• amend paragraph 2.44 to provide that for vehicles of category Y where a windscreen is non-existent, the windscreen test area is defined as the “Upper structure test area” with specified front, rear, and side boundaries
• amend paragraph 2.45 to provide that for vehicles of category Y where a windscreen is non-existent, the cowl monitoring area is bound in the rear by the front of the “Upper structure test area”
• amend paragraph 5.3.1.2 to provide that ARHSS shall automatically return to normal ride height while an ADS feature is active

Clean work-in-progress draft proposal to amend para. 0 to introduce provisions for vehicles of category Y and vehicles equipped with an Automated Driving System, amend para. 1.4. to specify that the Regulation does not apply to vehicles of category Y and to exempt certain vehicles of category N₁, amend para. 2.8. to define the bonnet rear reference line for vehicles of category Y without a windscreen, amend para. 2.22. to include automated driving sensors in the definition of front structure for vehicles of category X and Y, amend para. 2.29. to specify normal ride attitude for vehicles of category X and Y, amend para. 2.32. to define side reference lines for vehicles of category Y without A-pillars, amend para. 2.44. to define windscreen test area boundaries for vehicles of category Y without a windscreen, amend para. 2.45. to specify cowl monitoring area for vehicles of category Y without a windscreen, and amend para. 5.3.1.2. to modify requirements for Actively Regulated Hydro-pneumatic Suspension System when an Automated Driving System feature is active.

Proposal to insert a new introduction section defining application to vehicles of categories X and Y equipped with an Automated Driving System, to amend para. 6.1.5. to replace “driver assist systems” with “driver assistance systems”, to remove the non-exhaustive list “cameras, radar devices, etc.”, to replace “disoriented” with “misaligned”, and to add provisions clarifying that the exemption for sensor damage does not apply to automated driving systems unless the Automated Driving System performance of the Designed Driving Task is not affected.

Clean work-in-progress draft proposal to insert a new para. 0 establishing an introduction for vehicles of categories X and Y equipped with an Automated Driving System, and amend para. 6.1.5. to clarify that the exemption for sensors, cameras, and radar devices being part of driver assistance systems does not apply to automated driving systems unless the ADS performance of the DDT is not affected.