Final proposal as of 27 May 2016.

Presentation of OICA proposals for changes to the working draft heavy vehicles section of the electric vehicle safety GTR.

Updated proposal on the test methods as of 31 May 2016.

Draft text for inclusion in the technical report on the development of the electric vehicle safety GTR.

Revised U.S. proposal for BMS functionality and sequential fault testing requirements

OICA argument for excluding water protection testing from the initial electric vehicle safety GTR. Broadly, OICA believes the issue needs more consideration before determining the appropriate response, especially given the absence of any reported accidents related to the potential concern and the variety of strategies available to prevent electric shocks.

Comparison of provisions in the draft proposals prepared by China and by OICA and in UN R100 on battery electric vehicle safety.

Comments on the draft proposal (version EVSTF-08-29) for battery pack thermal propagation testing.

Comments from Toyota on the draft procedure.

Draft OICA “framing document” intended to clarify the consensus concerning the scope, purpose, and objectives of the BMS functionality work, as of 10 June 2016 (version 2).

Korea comments in response to Japan’s document EVSTF-08-07 on the draft text for evaluating fire resistance of electric vehicle power systems (document EVS-08-01).

Korea comments on the documents EVSTF-08-13 and 14 concerning the draft text on fire resistance (EVSTF-08-01).

Korea comments on the OICA proposal in document EVSTF-08-14 for an LPG fire test method.

US proposal taking into account and responding to comments received from JRC (22 April 2016) and OICA (17 May 2016)

Update version of document EVTS-08-60 on battery management system functionality.

OICA comments on the status of the discussions and proposed test procedure as of 13 June 2016.

OICA presentation on the proposed thermal propagation initiation methods (nail, heat, and overcharge) and concerns over the objectivity of the testing in terms of producing quantitative, comparable outcomes. OICA argues that the three proposed initiation methods are not equivalent and that overcharge should be removed. In addition, OICA could like to see a thermal runaway definition applicable to cathode or anode configurations and proposes changing the definition (detection criteria) of thermal runaway to temperature-increase rates of greater than 1.25°C/sec (75°C/min) or lower.

Presentation of research on various REESS configurations and proposal for test and performance criteria. Korea proposes configurations for the heat, penetration (nail), and overcharge initiation methods. In addition, Korea proposes a thermal runaway definition as the condition where the cell temperature rise rate ≥ 20°C/min and would limit the maximum cell temperature to ≥ 200°C Initiation method.

Marked up version of document EVSTF-08-40 showing JRC comments and questions on the draft text.