Proposal to clarify the definition of a “variant” in order to avoid unintended interpretations of the certification requirements that could result in additional financial and administrative costs. As currently worded the approval of a Test Group requires individual certification for each part contained within the Test Group. Some Test Groups can contain in the region of 30 part numbers. This would align the practice for brake discs and drums with that for brake linings.
27. The expert from CLEPA introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2015/22 proposing to enable the approval according to Regulation No. 90 of test groups instead of single variants. GRRF adopted the proposal with an amendment below:
In paragraph 4.2.3.(b), for “approval document” read “communication document”
28. GRRF adopted the proposal as amended and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration at their June 2016 sessions, as Supplement 3 to the 02 series of amendments to Regulation No. 90.
26. The expert from CLEPA introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2015/10 proposing to clarify the definition of brake discs and drums variants in Regulation No. 90. The proposal received some comments. The expert from CLEPA volunteered to prepare a revised proposal for the September 2015 session of GRRF.
59. The expert from CLEPA introduced GRRF-78-51 on difficulties linked to the definition of “variant” of brake disc/drum in UN Regulation No. 90. The expert informed that a proposal to UN Regulation No. 90 would be submitted to GRRF for consideration at its next session.
| GRRF-78-51 | |
| GRRF/2015/22 |