| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document title | UN Regulation No. 90 approval numbers and certification issue | ||||||||||
| Date | 18 Sep 2014 |
For testing purposes, UN R90 defines a “test group” as a grouping of parts having the same characteristics. The regulation then defines a “variant” as a part within a “test group”. However, the approval numbers under the rule stipulate the identification of each variant certified. As a result, the text technically requires certification of each individual part (variant) which was not the intention of the drafters. CLEPA raises this for information purposes with the intention to put forward a proposal at the next GRRF session. |
|||||||||
| Source(s) | CLEPA | ||||||||||
| Status | |||||||||||
| Rulemaking area(s) | |||||||||||
| Meeting(s) | |||||||||||
| Related documents | |||||||||||
| GRRF/2015/10 | Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 90 (Superseded) | ||||||||||
| Downloads: | .pdf format | ||||||||||
| Excerpts from session reports related to this document | |||||||||||
| GRRF | Session 78 | 16-19 Sep 2014 |
59. The expert from CLEPA introduced GRRF-78-51 on difficulties linked to the definition of “variant” of brake disc/drum in UN Regulation No. 90. The expert informed that a proposal to UN Regulation No. 90 would be submitted to GRRF for consideration at its next session. |
||||||||||