| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document Title | CLEPA analysis: Future i-Size approval possibilities | ||||||||
| Reference Number | GRSP-53-24 | ||||||||
| Date |
16 May 2013
|
||||||||
| Summary | Review of open issues concerning ISOFIX child restraint systems. | ||||||||
| Source(s) | CLEPA | ||||||||
| Rulemaking Area(s) | UN R44 Child Restraint Systems and UN R129 Enhanced Child Restraints | ||||||||
| Meeting(s) | |||||||||
| Downloads | |||||||||
| UNECE server | .pdf format | ||||||||
| Excerpts from session reports related to this document | |||||||||
| GRSP | Session 53 | 13-17 May 2013 |
45. GRSP noted GRSP-53-24, tabled by the expert from CLEPA and providing an analysis of the future i-size type approval possibilities. Particularly, he sought advice on a configuration of CRS combining a base attached with ISOFIX anchorages to the vehicle (with a support leg) and a shell installed on it; the shell at the choice of the user could be used, without the base and secured by adult safety belts. The experts from France and CI suggested that on exceptional basis, the complete configuration should receive an i-size type approval while the shell should be type approved according to UN Regulation No. 44. However, GRSP agreed to address this issue to the IWG on CRS, before taking a final decision. |
||||||||