1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Document Title UN R64: Proposal for a Supplement
Reference Number GRVA/2018/7
Date
21 Jul 2018
Summary Proposal to amend UN R64 in line with the introduction of the "extended mobility tyre" into UN R30 (see document GRVA/2018/6). This document will be handled by GRB during its 68th session and is referenced under GRVA due to the "conversion" of GRRF.
Source(s) ETRTO
Rulemaking Area(s) UN R64 Spare Tires
Proposal Status Superseded
Meeting(s)
Related Documents
GRVA/2018/6 UN R30: Proposal for a Supplement (superseded)
GRB-69-12 UN R30 and R64: EMT-ETRTO answer to Contracting Party question from GRB 68th session
WP.29/2019/52 UN R64: Proposal for Supplement 1 to the 03 series of amendments (adopted)
Downloads
UNECE server .pdf format .docx format
Excerpts from session reports related to this document
GRVA | Session 1 | 25-28 Sep 2018
GRB | Session 68 | 12-14 Sep 2018

28. The expert from ETRTO proposed amendments to UN Regulations Nos. 30 and 64 which introduce provisions related to extended mobility tyres (EMT) (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2018/6, ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2018/7 and GRB-68-14). He pointed out that EMT were already available on the market and needed to be regulated. The experts from Germany, Italy and Japan supported the proposals. The experts from France, Netherlands and Switzerland posed questions. The expert from UK requested data on the availability of EMT on the market. GRB was of the view that Contracting Parties needed more time to study the proposals and decided to defer this item to the next session. Meanwhile, GRB experts were invited to study the proposals and send their remarks to ETRTO.

28. The expert from ETRTO proposed amendments to UN Regulations Nos. 30 and 64 which introduce provisions related to extended mobility tyres (EMT) (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2018/6, ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2018/7 and GRB-68-14). He pointed out that EMT were already available on the market and needed to be regulated. The experts from Germany, Italy and Japan supported the proposals. The experts from France, Netherlands and Switzerland posed questions. The expert from UK requested data on the availability of EMT on the market. GRB was of the view that Contracting Parties needed more time to study the proposals and decided to defer this item to the next session. Meanwhile, GRB experts were invited to study the proposals and send their remarks to ETRTO.