|
05 series of amendments
| Supplement 2
(2009)
|
5
|
2
|
|
|
|
06 series of amendments
(2009)
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
Corrigendum 1 to the 06 series of amendments
(2009)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corrigendum 1 to Revision 6
(2009)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Erratum to Revision 6
(2009)
|
|
|
|
|
|
06 series of amendments
| Corrigendum 2
(2010)
|
6
|
|
2
|
|
|
06 series of amendments
| Supplement 1
(2011)
|
|
WP.29/2010/121
|
|
Discussion from 152nd WP.29 session
|
|
52. The World Forum considered the draft amendments under agenda items 4.4.1 and 4.4.3 to 4.4.5, and recommended their submission to AC.1 for voting, subject to the corrections mentioned in para. 53.
53. Agenda item 4.4.3, Regulation No. 16, document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2010/121, page 2, in paragraph 6.2.2.2., second line, correct to read “No other part of the buckle shall be of this colour. When the seat is occupied, red warning light …”.
54. Regarding the Informal documents Nos. WP.29-152-03, WP.29-152-04 and WP.29- 152-05 tabled by OICA under agenda items 4.4.1 (Regulation No. 12), 4.4.4 (Regulation No. 94) and 4.4.5 (Regulation No. 95), the World Forum referred them to GRSP for consideration at its December 2010 session.
See 4.4 above.
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2010/121, as amended by para. 53 above, was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-three Contracting Parties out of the 41 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-three voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
6
|
1
|
|
|
|
Corrigendum 2 to Revision 6
(2011)
|
|
|
|
|
|
06 series of amendments
| Supplement 2
(2012)
|
Integrated into Revision 7 of the regulation.
|
WP.29/2011/117
|
|
Discussion from 155th WP.29 session
|
|
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2011/117) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-three Contracting Parties out of the 42 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-three voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
6
|
2
|
|
|
|
Corrigendum 1 to Revision 7
(2012)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corrigendum 2 to Revision 7
(2013)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rectificatif 2 à la révision 7
(2013)
|
|
|
|
|
|
06 series of amendments
| Supplement 3
(2013)
|
Text adopted by the Working Party on Passive Safety (GRSP) at its fiftieth session to align the provisions of UN Regulation No. 16 with those of the new draft UN Regulation on Child Restraint Systems (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2012/53).
|
WP.29/2012/43
|
|
Discussion from 157th WP.29 session
|
|
As noted in paragraph 47 above under agenda item 4.7, the World Forum agreed to postpone consideration of this item pending the adoption of the draft UN Regulation on Child Restraint Systems.
Proposal unanimously adopted.
|
|
6
|
3
|
|
|
|
06 series of amendments
| Supplement 4
(2014)
|
Text as adopted by the Working Party on Passive Safety (GRSP) at its 52nd session in order to reduce unintentional retractor locking when fastening safety belts by increasing the strap acceleration threshold to 3 g.
|
WP.29/2013/43
|
|
Discussion from 160th WP.29 session
|
|
Proposal adopted.
|
|
6
|
4
|
|
|
|
Corrigendum 2 to Revision 7
(2013)
|
|
|
|
|
|
06 series of amendments
| Supplement 5
(2014)
|
Proposal as approved by the GRSP to clarify the risks involved in installing a rearward-facing child restraint in a seating position that is equipped with a frontal airbag and to align the labeling requirements with new requirements of UN Regulation No. 94 on frontal impacts.
|
WP.29/2013/104
|
|
Discussion from 161st WP.29 session
|
|
[Proposal adopted.]
|
|
6
|
5
|
|
|
|
06 series of amendments
| Supplement 6
(2016)
|
Proposal to specify buckle-release color, use of buckle warning lights, and to clarify the installation provisions for “general use” safety-belts (Annex 1B, item 12).
|
WP.29/2015/93
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2015/93, Not amended, was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-six Contracting Parties out of the 44 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-six voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
6
|
6
|
|
|
|
06 series of amendments
| Supplement 7
(2017)
|
Proposal to introduce (i) a definition of flexible shoulder adjustment device for height, (ii) provisions for its testing and (iii) to define its strict field of installation for vehicle categories M2 and M3.
|
WP.29/2016/36
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2016/36) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-six Contracting Parties out of the 45 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-six voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
6
|
7
|
|
|
|
06 series of amendments
| Supplement 8
(2017)
|
Proposal to clarify and improve provisions for - the belt routing and positioning of the universal child restraint system seat fixture during testing;
- dynamic testing of the rear seat system and advanced restraint system approval; and
- to restructure and simplify the consumer information requirements on the installation of ISOFIX child restraint systems under UN R16.
.
|
WP.29/2016/98
|
|
Discussion from 170th WP.29 session
|
|
74. The World Forum considered the draft amendments under agenda items 4.8.1 to 4.8.10 and recommended their submission to AC.1 for voting subject to the editorial correction below:
75. Agenda item 4.8.1, in ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2016/98, paragraph 12.1, correct "granted/refused/extended/withdrawn,2 " to read: "granted/extended,2 ".
19. The expert from the Netherlands informed GRSP on the progress of work of the “Task Force (TF) on Energy absorption of seats” (former group of interested experts on new restraint system technology). He clarified that the group had decided that eventually there was no need to develop further amendments to the Regulation. He added that Supplement 8 to the 06 series amendments to Regulation No. 16 (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2016/98), adopted by WP.29 at its November 2016 session, was sufficient to cover the energy absorption requirements of the rear part of seat backs. Accordingly, he announced that the activity of the TF was dissolved. GRSP agreed to remove ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2015/27 from its agenda.
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2016/98, Yes, was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-five Contracting Parties out of the 45 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-five voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
6
|
8
|
|
|
|
07 series of amendments
(2017)
|
Proposal to require seat-belt reminders for all seating positions, including rear positions, and to clarify the scope of the regulation.
|
WP.29/2016/99
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2016/99, No, was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-five Contracting Parties out of the 45 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-five voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
06 series of amendments
| Supplement 9
| Corrigendum 1
(2018)
|
|
WP.29/2018/64
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2018/64) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-four Contracting Parties out of the 47 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-four voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
6
|
9
|
1
|
|
|
07 series of amendments
| Supplement 1
| Corrigendum 1
(2018)
|
Proposal to correct Table 1 by deleting “F1” (this fixture is part of a corresponding ISO Standard but not in UN R16) and to replace “universal” by “i-Size” in the title of Appendix 5, as UN R129 booster seats can be only i-Size or specific.
|
WP.29/2018/65
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2018/65) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-four Contracting Parties out of the 47 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-four voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
7
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
06 series of amendments
| Supplement 10
| Corrigendum 1
(2018)
|
Proposal to clarify and correct the reference in paragraph 8.3.6. to UN R14 and the new UN Regulation on ISOFIX anchorages with regard to the measurement of the pitch angle used for the geometrical assessment of the installation of ISOFIX child restraint fixtures. This proposal relates directly to the supplements presented in document WP.29/2017/120.
|
WP.29/2018/66
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2018/66) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-four Contracting Parties out of the 47 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-four voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
6
|
10
|
1
|
|
|
07 series of amendments
| Supplement 2
| Corrigendum 1
(2018)
|
Proposal to clarify and correct the reference in paragraph 8.3.6. to UN R14 and the new UN Regulation on ISOFIX anchorages with regard to the measurement of the pitch angle used for the geometrical assessment of the installation of ISOFIX child restraint fixtures. This proposal relates to the supplements presented in document WP.29/2017/120.
|
WP.29/2018/76
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2018/76) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-four Contracting Parties out of the 47 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-four voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
7
|
2
|
1
|
|
|
07 series of amendments
| Supplement 3
(2018)
|
Proposal to clarify that the second level warning requirement in the 02 series of amendments to the UN R16 is dependent upon the needs of each seating position. A strict reading of paragraph 2.45. would require a second-level warning in the event of any unfastened seat-belt in a front or rear position. This proposal would clarify that the second-level warning is required depending on the individual position requirement (e.g., based on detection that a position is occupied).
|
WP.29/2018/37
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2018/37) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-four Contracting Parties out of the 47 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-four voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
7
|
3
|
|
|
|
06 series of amendments
| Supplement 9
(2017)
|
Proposal to add new CRS fixtures and otherwise align UN R16 with changes introduced through UN R129 (enhanced child restraint systems). Two “Booster Seat” fixtures (ISO/B2 and ISO/B3) were added to UN R16 to coincide with the implementation of Phase 2 of UN R129. These fixtures were developed within ISO/TC 22/SC 36/WG 2 (Child Restraint Systems) and follow the principle already established in Regulations 16 and 129 to ensure child restraint to car compatibility. An additional “Reduced-Size Rearward Facing toddler CRS” fixture (ISO/R2x) was added to facilitate compatibility in small cars/seating positions. The ISO/B2 booster seat fixture was added in the i-Size concept. Lateral facing fixtures (ISO/L1 and ISO/L2) have been upgraded. The proposal also corrects figure 2 in Annex 1B to show the referenced zones A and B, to add the sentence “Non-rigid material of < 50 Shore A hardness may be removed in order to demonstrate that covered or padded rigid parts are not contacted by the head or the chest of the manikin during the test.” and makes editorial improvements.
|
WP.29/2017/59
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2017/59) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-six Contracting Parties out of the 47 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Zero voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
6
|
9
|
|
|
|
07 series of amendments
| Supplement 1
(2018)
|
Proposal to update the 07 series of amendments in line with UN R129 and changes to the 06 series (Supplements 8 and 9). Two “Booster Seat” fixtures (ISO/B2 and ISO/B3) were added to UN R16 to coincide with the implementation of Phase 2 of UN Regulation No. 129. These fixtures were developed within ISO/TC 22/SC 36/WG 2 (Child Restraint Systems) and follow the principle already established in Regulations 16 and 129 to ensure child restraint to car compatibility. An additional “Reduced-Size Rearward Facing toddler CRS” fixture (ISO/R2x) was added to facilitate compatibility in small cars/seating positions. The ISO/B2 booster seat fixture was added in the i-Size concept. Lateral facing fixtures (ISO/L1 and ISO/L2) have been upgraded. The proposal also corrects figure 2 in Annex 1B to show the referenced zones A and B, to add the sentence “Non-rigid material of < 50 Shore A hardness may be removed in order to demonstrate that covered or padded rigid parts are not contacted by the head or the chest of the manikin during the test.” and makes editorial improvements.
|
WP.29/2017/60
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2017/60) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-six Contracting Parties out of the 47 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-six voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
7
|
1
|
|
|
|
08 series of amendments
(2019)
|
Proposal to: - harmonize airbag warning labels regarding the correct use of a child restraint system in a seating position equipped with an activated frontal airbag in order to prohibit the display of additional information unrelated to child safety, and
- clarify that only a 3-point-belt shall be permitted for the driver seating position in order to address differing interpretations among Technical Services regarding which requirements apply for driver position seat-belt approval.
As from 1 September 2020, authorities will not be obliged to accept applicable type approvals to the preceding series of amendments that were first issued on or after 1 September 2020. As from 1 September 2022, they will not be obliged to accept any applicable approvals to the preceding series. These transitional provisions only apply to vehicles equipped with airbags. Approvals for seat belt and restraint systems remain valid.
|
WP.29/2018/141
|
|
Discussion from 176th WP.29 session
|
|
117. The representative of the United States of America presented proposals on ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2018/141 and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2018/142 under agenda items 4.8.15 and 4.7.16, to amend UN Regulations Nos. 16 and 17. The World Forum recommended their submission to AC.1 for voting.
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2018/141) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-seven Contracting Parties out of the 47 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-seven voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
07 series of amendments
| Supplement 2
(2018)
|
For the International Whole Vehicle Type Approval, a UN Regulation is split in two regulations, UN Regulation No. 14-08 series of amendments including only adult safety belt anchorages and a new regulation UN Regulation No. [XX] will include all requirements for child restraint anchorages. Accordingly, this proposal would update the references to UN Regulation No. 14 in UN Regulation No. 16 in order to recognize child restraint system anchorages installed on the vehicle and approved under the new regulation.
|
WP.29/2017/120
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2017/120) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-four Contracting Parties out of the 46 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-four voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
7
|
2
|
|
|
|
06 series of amendments
| Supplement 10
(2018)
|
For the International Whole Vehicle Type Approval, a UN Regulation is split in two regulations, UN Regulation No. 14-08 series of amendments including only adult safety belt anchorages and a new regulation UN Regulation No. [XX] will include all requirements for child restraint anchorages. Accordingly, this proposal would update the references to UN Regulation No. 14 in UN Regulation No. 16 in order to recognize child restraint system anchorages installed on the vehicle and approved under the new regulation.
|
WP.29/2017/120
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2017/120) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-four Contracting Parties out of the 46 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-four voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
6
|
10
|
|
|
|
06 series of amendments
| Supplement 11
(2019)
|
Proposal to correct an oversight by adding the minimum requirement for at least a two-point lap belt (Br3, Br4m, Br4Nm) for use with rearward facing child restraints for M3 as is already the case for M2 vehicles.
|
WP.29/2018/128
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2018/128) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-seven Contracting Parties out of the 47 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-seven voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
6
|
11
|
|
|
|
07 series of amendments
| Supplement 4
(2019)
|
Proposal to correct an oversight by adding the minimum requirement for at least a two-point lap belt (Br3, Br4m, Br4Nm) for use with rearward facing child restraints for M3 as is already the case for M2 vehicles.
|
WP.29/2018/129
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2018/129) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-seven Contracting Parties out of the 47 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-seven voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
7
|
4
|
|
|
|
07 series of amendments
| Supplement 6
(2021)
|
GRSP proposal GRSP proposal to clarify seat-belt reminder requirements for adjustable rear seats and the transitional provisions.
|
WP.29/2020/112
|
|
Discussion from 182nd WP.29 session
|
|
102. WP.29 recommended to submit document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2020/112 to AC.1 with deletion of proposed new paragraph 15.5.6.
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2020/112, 2020/112 as amended by para. 102., was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-five Contracting Parties out of the 49 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-five voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
7
|
6
|
|
|
|
08 series of amendments
| Supplement 1
(2021)
|
Proposal to align the 08 series with previous series of amendments with regard to approval authority notification of modifications that affect technical performance and/or documentation.
|
WP.29/2020/51
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2020/51) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-nine Contracting Parties out of the 49 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-nine voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
8
|
1
|
|
|
|
06 series of amendments
| Supplement 12
(2020)
|
Proposal to clarify that modifications need only be notified to the Type Approval Authority when they have an influence on the performance (compliance with technical requirements of UN R16) and/or the documentation required by the UN Regulation. The proposal also updates the Communication Form to add rear safety belt reminders.
|
WP.29/2019/104
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2019/104) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-six Contracting Parties out of the 48 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-six voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
6
|
12
|
|
|
|
07 series of amendments
| Supplement 5
(2020)
|
Proposal to clarify that modifications need only be notified to the Type Approval Authority when they have an influence on the performance (compliance with technical requirements of UN R16) and/or the documentation required by the UN Regulation. The proposal also updates the Communication Form to add rear safety belt reminders.
|
WP.29/2019/105
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2019/105) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-six Contracting Parties out of the 48 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-six voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
7
|
5
|
|
|
|
08 series of amendments
| Supplement 2
(2021)
|
GRSP proposal to clarify seat-belt reminder requirements for adjustable rear seats and the transitional provisions.
|
WP.29/2020/113
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2020/113) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-five Contracting Parties out of the 49 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-five voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
8
|
2
|
|
|
|
06 series of amendments
| Supplement 12
| Corrigendum 1
(Adopted by WP.29)
|
Proposal from GRSP to correct the information sheet (Certificate) in paragraph 3.3. to position the information on the safety-belt reminder in relation to the seating position of the driver.
|
WP.29/2021/111
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2021/111) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-six Contracting Parties out of the 49 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-six voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
6
|
12
|
1
|
|
|
07 series of amendments
| Supplement 7
(Adopted by WP.29)
|
Proposal from GRSP to correct an omission in paragraph 3 with regard to information on safety-belt reminders and align the regulation with Annex I of EU regulation 2018/858.
|
WP.29/2021/112
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2021/112) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-six Contracting Parties out of the 49 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-five voted in favor with zero against and one abstaining.
|
|
7
|
7
|
|
|
|
08 series of amendments
| Supplement 3
(2022)
|
Proposal from GRSP to correct an omission in paragraph 3 with regard to information on safety-belt reminders and align the regulation with Annex I of EU regulation 2018/858.
|
WP.29/2021/113
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2021/113) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-six Contracting Parties out of the 49 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-five voted in favor with zero against and one abstaining.
|
|
8
|
3
|
|
|
|
09 series of amendments
(Formal WP.29 review)
|
Proposal to: - define minimum safety-belt installation specifications for forward-facing seats which face a Child Restraint System in M2 and M3 vehicles
- introduce definitions, requirements and a test procedure for lower tether anchorages
- prohibit use of the Unique Identifier in place of the UN R16 approval mark, and
- remove two exemptions for two-point belts
- clarify the requirements for safety-belt reminder of rear seat row(s)
- clarify:
- how to assess safety-belt reminder connection, in the case of removable seats and
- safety-belt reminder systems test procedure (first and second level warning), visual warning and requirements for safety-belt reminder of rear seat row(s).
|
WP.29/2023/105
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2023/105) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-six Contracting Parties out of the 51 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-six voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
08 series of amendments
| Supplement 4
(2024)
|
Proposal to amend the current support leg volume to improve the compatibility between the support leg volume and the Child Restraint Fixtures used for assessing the external dimensions of an ECRS.
|
WP.29/2023/46
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2023/46) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-two Contracting Parties out of the 51 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-two voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
8
|
4
|
|
|
|
08 series of amendments
| Supplement 5
(Formal WP.29 review)
|
Proposal to define minimum safety-belt installation specifications for forward-facing seats which face a Child Restraint System in M2 and M3 vehicles and to prevent the approval mark from being replaced by a Unique Identifier.
|
WP.29/2023/114
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2023/114) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-six Contracting Parties out of the 51 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-six voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
8
|
5
|
|
|
|
10 series of amendments
(Formal WP.29 review)
|
Proposal to amend UN R16 to effect the separation of certain provisions into new UN Regulations on the installation of occupant restraint systems and on safety-belt reminders.
|
WP.29/2024/118
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
09 series of amendments
| Supplement 1
(Formal WP.29 review)
|
Proposal to update references to the three-dimensional “H” point measurement and calibration procedure pursuant to the transposition of these provisions from the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles (RE3) to Mutual Resolution No. 1.
|
WP.29/2024/124
|
|
9
|
1
|
|
|
|
11 series of amendments
(Formal GR review)
|
Proposal from the ad hoc group on safety-belt reminders to clarify: (a) exemption of the presence of SBR on folding seats, (b) first level of warning tests with transmission in neutral position, and (c) interference of devices for remote starting of vehicles with SBR.
|
GRSP/2024/2
|
|
Discussion from 75th GRSP session
|
|
13. The expert from the Republic of Korea, Chair of the ad-hoc group on seat-belt reminders (SBR), introduced GRSP-75-12 to explain that were different interpretations to be solved on SBR activation when the safety-belts was unfastened. The expert from Spain argued that current provisions in the UN Regulation need changes. Furthermore, the expert from the Republic of Korea introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2024/2 to clarify the text of the UN Regulation. GRSP also noted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2024/6, tabled by the expert from Germany to clarify the buckle-opening test. GRSP endorsed in principle this last proposal. GRSP finally agreed to resume consideration on ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2024/2, ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2024/6 and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2023/32 (see ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/74, paragraph 19) at the December 2024 session of GRSP. The experts from Germany, Japan and the Republic of Korea were requested to adapt their respective proposals to the new adopted UN Regulations and to the 10 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 16 (see paragraph 12 above).
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
10 series of amendments
| Supplement 1
(Adopted by WP.29)
|
Proposal to clarify how to perform the buckle-opening test under paragraph 7.8. of the text and to update references to the three-dimensional “H” point measurement and calibration procedure pursuant to the transposition of these provisions from the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles (RE3) to Mutual Resolution No. 1.
|
WP.29/2025/49
|
|
10
|
1
|
|
|
|
10 series of amendments
| Supplement 2
(Formal GR review)
|
Proposal to allow the use of talcum for the dust resistance test as an alternative to dry
quartz.
|
GRSP/2025/3
|
|
Proposal to remove the prohibition on use the Unique Identifier per the WP.29 decision to change the default application of the UI from a requirement (requiring prohibition in cases where UI does not apply) to a permission (requiring an affirmative statement that UI may be used under a Regulation).
|
GRSP-77-05
|
|
10
|
2
|
|
|
|
08 series of amendments
| Supplement 5
(Informal GR review)
|
Proposal to remove the prohibition on use the Unique Identifier per the WP.29 decision to change the default application of the UI from a requirement (requiring prohibition in cases where UI does not apply) to a permission (requiring an affirmative statement that UI may be used under a Regulation).
|
GRSP-77-03
|
|
8
|
5
|
|
|
|
09 series of amendments
| Supplement 2
(Informal GR review)
|
Proposal to remove the prohibition on use the Unique Identifier per the WP.29 decision to change the default application of the UI from a requirement (requiring prohibition in cases where UI does not apply) to a permission (requiring an affirmative statement that UI may be used under a Regulation).
|
GRSP-77-04
|
|
9
|
2
|
|
|