|
05 series of amendments
| Supplement 2
(2009)
|
5
|
2
|
|
|
|
06 series of amendments
(2009)
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
Corrigendum 1 to the 06 series of amendments
(2009)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corrigendum 1 to Revision 6
(2009)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Erratum to Revision 6
(2009)
|
|
|
|
|
|
06 series of amendments
| Corrigendum 2
(2010)
|
6
|
|
2
|
|
|
06 series of amendments
| Supplement 1
(2011)
|
|
WP.29/2010/121
|
|
Discussion from 152nd WP.29 session
|
|
52. The World Forum considered the draft amendments under agenda items 4.4.1 and 4.4.3 to 4.4.5, and recommended their submission to AC.1 for voting, subject to the corrections mentioned in para. 53.
53. Agenda item 4.4.3, Regulation No. 16, document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2010/121, page 2, in paragraph 6.2.2.2., second line, correct to read “No other part of the buckle shall be of this colour. When the seat is occupied, red warning light …”.
54. Regarding the Informal documents Nos. WP.29-152-03, WP.29-152-04 and WP.29- 152-05 tabled by OICA under agenda items 4.4.1 (Regulation No. 12), 4.4.4 (Regulation No. 94) and 4.4.5 (Regulation No. 95), the World Forum referred them to GRSP for consideration at its December 2010 session.
See 4.4 above.
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2010/121, as amended by para. 53 above, was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-three Contracting Parties out of the 41 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-three voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
6
|
1
|
|
|
|
Corrigendum 2 to Revision 6
(2011)
|
|
|
|
|
|
06 series of amendments
| Supplement 2
(2012)
|
Integrated into Revision 7 of the regulation.
|
WP.29/2011/117
|
|
Discussion from 155th WP.29 session
|
|
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2011/117) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-three Contracting Parties out of the 42 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-three voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
6
|
2
|
|
|
|
Corrigendum 1 to Revision 7
(2012)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corrigendum 2 to Revision 7
(2013)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rectificatif 2 à la révision 7
(2013)
|
|
|
|
|
|
06 series of amendments
| Supplement 3
(2013)
|
Text adopted by the Working Party on Passive Safety (GRSP) at its fiftieth session to align the provisions of UN Regulation No. 16 with those of the new draft UN Regulation on Child Restraint Systems (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2012/53).
|
WP.29/2012/43
|
|
Discussion from 157th WP.29 session
|
|
As noted in paragraph 47 above under agenda item 4.7, the World Forum agreed to postpone consideration of this item pending the adoption of the draft UN Regulation on Child Restraint Systems.
Proposal unanimously adopted.
|
|
6
|
3
|
|
|
|
06 series of amendments
| Supplement 4
(2014)
|
Text as adopted by the Working Party on Passive Safety (GRSP) at its 52nd session in order to reduce unintentional retractor locking when fastening safety belts by increasing the strap acceleration threshold to 3 g.
|
WP.29/2013/43
|
|
Discussion from 160th WP.29 session
|
|
Proposal adopted.
|
|
6
|
4
|
|
|
|
Corrigendum 2 to Revision 7
(2013)
|
|
|
|
|
|
06 series of amendments
| Supplement 5
(2014)
|
Proposal as approved by the GRSP to clarify the risks involved in installing a rearward-facing child restraint in a seating position that is equipped with a frontal airbag and to align the labeling requirements with new requirements of UN Regulation No. 94 on frontal impacts.
|
WP.29/2013/104
|
|
Discussion from 161st WP.29 session
|
|
[Proposal adopted.]
|
|
6
|
5
|
|
|
|
06 series of amendments
| Supplement 6
(2016)
|
Proposal to specify buckle-release color, use of buckle warning lights, and to clarify the installation provisions for “general use” safety-belts (Annex 1B, item 12).
|
WP.29/2015/93
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2015/93, Not amended, was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-six Contracting Parties out of the 44 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-six voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
6
|
6
|
|
|
|
06 series of amendments
| Supplement 7
(2017)
|
Proposal to introduce (i) a definition of flexible shoulder adjustment device for height, (ii) provisions for its testing and (iii) to define its strict field of installation for vehicle categories M2 and M3.
|
WP.29/2016/36
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2016/36) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-six Contracting Parties out of the 45 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-six voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
6
|
7
|
|
|
|
06 series of amendments
| Supplement 8
(2017)
|
Proposal to clarify and improve provisions for - the belt routing and positioning of the universal child restraint system seat fixture during testing;
- dynamic testing of the rear seat system and advanced restraint system approval; and
- to restructure and simplify the consumer information requirements on the installation of ISOFIX child restraint systems under UN R16.
.
|
WP.29/2016/98
|
|
Discussion from 170th WP.29 session
|
|
74. The World Forum considered the draft amendments under agenda items 4.8.1 to 4.8.10 and recommended their submission to AC.1 for voting subject to the editorial correction below:
75. Agenda item 4.8.1, in ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2016/98, paragraph 12.1, correct "granted/refused/extended/withdrawn,2 " to read: "granted/extended,2 ".
19. The expert from the Netherlands informed GRSP on the progress of work of the “Task Force (TF) on Energy absorption of seats” (former group of interested experts on new restraint system technology). He clarified that the group had decided that eventually there was no need to develop further amendments to the Regulation. He added that Supplement 8 to the 06 series amendments to Regulation No. 16 (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2016/98), adopted by WP.29 at its November 2016 session, was sufficient to cover the energy absorption requirements of the rear part of seat backs. Accordingly, he announced that the activity of the TF was dissolved. GRSP agreed to remove ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2015/27 from its agenda.
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2016/98, Yes, was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-five Contracting Parties out of the 45 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-five voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
Proposal to amend document WP.29/2016/98. The proposal clarifies the subject of paragraph 12.1 and corrects an editorial error concerning the repetition of footnote 2 that exists already in Annex 1B to Regulation 16.
|
WP.29-170-04
|
|
6
|
8
|
|
|
|
07 series of amendments
(2017)
|
Proposal to require seat-belt reminders for all seating positions, including rear positions, and to clarify the scope of the regulation.
|
WP.29/2016/99
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2016/99, No, was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-five Contracting Parties out of the 45 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-five voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
06 series of amendments
| Supplement 9
| Corrigendum 1
(2018)
|
|
WP.29/2018/64
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2018/64) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-four Contracting Parties out of the 47 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-four voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
6
|
9
|
1
|
|
|
07 series of amendments
| Supplement 1
| Corrigendum 1
(2018)
|
Proposal to correct Table 1 by deleting “F1” (this fixture is part of a corresponding ISO Standard but not in UN R16) and to replace “universal” by “i-Size” in the title of Appendix 5, as UN R129 booster seats can be only i-Size or specific.
|
WP.29/2018/65
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2018/65) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-four Contracting Parties out of the 47 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-four voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
7
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
06 series of amendments
| Supplement 10
| Corrigendum 1
(2018)
|
Proposal to clarify and correct the reference in paragraph 8.3.6. to UN R14 and the new UN Regulation on ISOFIX anchorages with regard to the measurement of the pitch angle used for the geometrical assessment of the installation of ISOFIX child restraint fixtures. This proposal relates directly to the supplements presented in document WP.29/2017/120.
|
WP.29/2018/66
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2018/66) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-four Contracting Parties out of the 47 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-four voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
6
|
10
|
1
|
|
|
07 series of amendments
| Supplement 2
| Corrigendum 1
(2018)
|
Proposal to clarify and correct the reference in paragraph 8.3.6. to UN R14 and the new UN Regulation on ISOFIX anchorages with regard to the measurement of the pitch angle used for the geometrical assessment of the installation of ISOFIX child restraint fixtures. This proposal relates to the supplements presented in document WP.29/2017/120.
|
WP.29/2018/76
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2018/76) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-four Contracting Parties out of the 47 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-four voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
7
|
2
|
1
|
|
|
07 series of amendments
| Supplement 3
(2018)
|
Proposal to clarify that the second level warning requirement in the 02 series of amendments to the UN R16 is dependent upon the needs of each seating position. A strict reading of paragraph 2.45. would require a second-level warning in the event of any unfastened seat-belt in a front or rear position. This proposal would clarify that the second-level warning is required depending on the individual position requirement (e.g., based on detection that a position is occupied).
|
WP.29/2018/37
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2018/37) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-four Contracting Parties out of the 47 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-four voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
7
|
3
|
|
|
|
06 series of amendments
| Supplement 9
(2017)
|
Proposal to add new CRS fixtures and otherwise align UN R16 with changes introduced through UN R129 (enhanced child restraint systems). Two “Booster Seat” fixtures (ISO/B2 and ISO/B3) were added to UN R16 to coincide with the implementation of Phase 2 of UN R129. These fixtures were developed within ISO/TC 22/SC 36/WG 2 (Child Restraint Systems) and follow the principle already established in Regulations 16 and 129 to ensure child restraint to car compatibility. An additional “Reduced-Size Rearward Facing toddler CRS” fixture (ISO/R2x) was added to facilitate compatibility in small cars/seating positions. The ISO/B2 booster seat fixture was added in the i-Size concept. Lateral facing fixtures (ISO/L1 and ISO/L2) have been upgraded. The proposal also corrects figure 2 in Annex 1B to show the referenced zones A and B, to add the sentence “Non-rigid material of < 50 Shore A hardness may be removed in order to demonstrate that covered or padded rigid parts are not contacted by the head or the chest of the manikin during the test.” and makes editorial improvements.
|
WP.29/2017/59
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2017/59) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-six Contracting Parties out of the 47 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Zero voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
6
|
9
|
|
|
|
07 series of amendments
| Supplement 1
(2018)
|
Proposal to update the 07 series of amendments in line with UN R129 and changes to the 06 series (Supplements 8 and 9). Two “Booster Seat” fixtures (ISO/B2 and ISO/B3) were added to UN R16 to coincide with the implementation of Phase 2 of UN Regulation No. 129. These fixtures were developed within ISO/TC 22/SC 36/WG 2 (Child Restraint Systems) and follow the principle already established in Regulations 16 and 129 to ensure child restraint to car compatibility. An additional “Reduced-Size Rearward Facing toddler CRS” fixture (ISO/R2x) was added to facilitate compatibility in small cars/seating positions. The ISO/B2 booster seat fixture was added in the i-Size concept. Lateral facing fixtures (ISO/L1 and ISO/L2) have been upgraded. The proposal also corrects figure 2 in Annex 1B to show the referenced zones A and B, to add the sentence “Non-rigid material of < 50 Shore A hardness may be removed in order to demonstrate that covered or padded rigid parts are not contacted by the head or the chest of the manikin during the test.” and makes editorial improvements.
|
WP.29/2017/60
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2017/60) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-six Contracting Parties out of the 47 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-six voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
7
|
1
|
|
|
|
08 series of amendments
(2019)
|
Proposal to: - harmonize airbag warning labels regarding the correct use of a child restraint system in a seating position equipped with an activated frontal airbag in order to prohibit the display of additional information unrelated to child safety, and
- clarify that only a 3-point-belt shall be permitted for the driver seating position in order to address differing interpretations among Technical Services regarding which requirements apply for driver position seat-belt approval.
As from 1 September 2020, authorities will not be obliged to accept applicable type approvals to the preceding series of amendments that were first issued on or after 1 September 2020. As from 1 September 2022, they will not be obliged to accept any applicable approvals to the preceding series. These transitional provisions only apply to vehicles equipped with airbags. Approvals for seat belt and restraint systems remain valid.
|
WP.29/2018/141
|
|
Discussion from 176th WP.29 session
|
|
117. The representative of the United States of America presented proposals on ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2018/141 and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2018/142 under agenda items 4.8.15 and 4.7.16, to amend UN Regulations Nos. 16 and 17. The World Forum recommended their submission to AC.1 for voting.
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2018/141) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-seven Contracting Parties out of the 47 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-seven voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
07 series of amendments
| Supplement 2
(2018)
|
For the International Whole Vehicle Type Approval, a UN Regulation is split in two regulations, UN Regulation No. 14-08 series of amendments including only adult safety belt anchorages and a new regulation UN Regulation No. [XX] will include all requirements for child restraint anchorages. Accordingly, this proposal would update the references to UN Regulation No. 14 in UN Regulation No. 16 in order to recognize child restraint system anchorages installed on the vehicle and approved under the new regulation.
|
WP.29/2017/120
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2017/120) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-four Contracting Parties out of the 46 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-four voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
7
|
2
|
|
|
|
06 series of amendments
| Supplement 10
(2018)
|
For the International Whole Vehicle Type Approval, a UN Regulation is split in two regulations, UN Regulation No. 14-08 series of amendments including only adult safety belt anchorages and a new regulation UN Regulation No. [XX] will include all requirements for child restraint anchorages. Accordingly, this proposal would update the references to UN Regulation No. 14 in UN Regulation No. 16 in order to recognize child restraint system anchorages installed on the vehicle and approved under the new regulation.
|
WP.29/2017/120
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2017/120) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-four Contracting Parties out of the 46 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-four voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
6
|
10
|
|
|
|
06 series of amendments
| Supplement 11
(2019)
|
Proposal to correct an oversight by adding the minimum requirement for at least a two-point lap belt (Br3, Br4m, Br4Nm) for use with rearward facing child restraints for M3 as is already the case for M2 vehicles.
|
WP.29/2018/128
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2018/128) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-seven Contracting Parties out of the 47 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-seven voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
6
|
11
|
|
|
|
07 series of amendments
| Supplement 4
(2019)
|
Proposal to correct an oversight by adding the minimum requirement for at least a two-point lap belt (Br3, Br4m, Br4Nm) for use with rearward facing child restraints for M3 as is already the case for M2 vehicles.
|
WP.29/2018/129
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2018/129) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-seven Contracting Parties out of the 47 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-seven voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
7
|
4
|
|
|
|
07 series of amendments
| Corrigendum 1
(Superseded)
|
Proposal to update the Communication Form since from the 07 series of amendments rear safety belt reminders have been added.
|
GRSP/2018/25
|
|
Discussion from 64th GRSP session
|
|
15. The expert from the Netherlands introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/25 to correct the type approval communication to extend the requirements for the safety-belt reminder installation not only to the driver’s seat. Since, the proposed amendment would entail broader technical aspects, GRSP agreed to incorporate it in a further proposal of amendments to UN Regulation No. 16. Finally, GRSP agreed to resume discussion on this subject at its May 2019 session.
18. The expert from CLEPA introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2019/6 to clarify which modification of the vehicle type or the safety-belt or restraint system shall be notified to the Type Approval Authority. GRSP agreed to combine ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2019/6 with ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/25 to extend the requirements for the safety-belt reminder installation not only to the driver’s seat (see ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/64, para. 15). GRSP finally agreed with both proposals, neither amended, and requested the secretariat to submit ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2019/6 and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/25 as Supplement 12 to the 06 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 16 and as Supplement 5 to the 07 series of amendments, for consideration and vote at the November 2019 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1.
|
|
7
|
|
1
|
|
|
07 series of amendments
| Supplement 6
(Formal GR review)
|
Proposal to introduce an optional (on the choice of the manufacturer) test procedure for frontal airbags in combination with rearward facing child restraint systems in the rear seat to demonstrate that no deactivation of the airbag is needed.
|
GRSP/2019/15
|
|
7
|
6
|
|
|
|
08 series of amendments
| Supplement 1
(Formal GR review)
|
Proposal from the GRSP secretariat to align the 08 series with previous series of amendments with regard to approval authority notification of modifications that affect technical performance and/or documentation. (This change was apparently overlooked in the handling of GRSP/2019/6).
|
GRSP/2019/24
|
|
8
|
1
|
|
|
|
06 series of amendments
| Supplement 12
(Formal WP.29 review)
|
Proposal to clarify that modifications need only be notified to the Type Approval Authority when they have an influence on the performance (compliance with technical requirements of UN R16) and/or the documentation required by the UN Regulation. The proposal also updates the Communication Form to add rear safety belt reminders.
|
WP.29/2019/104
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2019/104) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-six Contracting Parties out of the 48 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-six voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
6
|
12
|
|
|
|
07 series of amendments
| Supplement 5
(Formal WP.29 review)
|
Proposal to clarify that modifications need only be notified to the Type Approval Authority when they have an influence on the performance (compliance with technical requirements of UN R16) and/or the documentation required by the UN Regulation. The proposal also updates the Communication Form to add rear safety belt reminders.
|
WP.29/2019/105
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2019/105) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-six Contracting Parties out of the 48 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-six voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
7
|
5
|
|
|