|
00 series of amendments
| Supplement 1
(2014)
|
0
|
1
|
|
|
|
00 series of amendments
(2013)
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
00 series of amendments
| Corrigendum 1
(2013)
|
0
|
|
1
|
|
|
00 series of amendments
| Supplement 2
(2014)
|
Proposal as approved by the GRSP to amend the regulation pursuant to the recommendations resulting from a review of the text by the informal working group on child restraint systems.
|
WP.29/2013/110
|
|
Discussion from 161st WP.29 session
|
|
62. Agenda item 4.8.10, Regulation No. 129, document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2013/110 (see WP.29-161-02):
Page 4, paragraph 6.3.5., renumber the reference to footnote 1 and the footnote 1 to read footnote 2.
Page 6, the amendment to paragraph 7.1.2.5. (former) shall be deleted.
Page 16, Annex 21, the second table, last column and last row, correct the figure “1600 mm” to read “160 mm”.
|
|
0
|
2
|
|
|
|
00 series of amendments
| Supplement 3
(2014)
|
This supplement concerns child restraint systems comprised of a base fixture to which a portable shell can be attached. The base fixture is attached to the vehicle by the ISOFIX anchorages in the seating position and the shell attached to the base. However, since the shells may also be designed for use without the base fixture in a configuration where the shell is secured by the adult safety belt of the seating position, this supplement would enable type approvals under UN R129 for this configuration.
|
WP.29/2014/33
|
|
Discussion from 162nd WP.29 session
|
|
30. The expert from France, Chair of the IWG on Enhanced Child Restraint Systems (ECRS), introduced the status report of the progress of his group (GRSP-54-35). He also introduced the draft 01 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 129 (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2013/23) and GRSP-54-24 amending it. He explained that the proposal would cover Phase 2 of the UN Regulation, introducing provisions for non-integral CRS (“Universal Booster” or “Specific to vehicle Booster”). The expert from Germany expressed reservation to the proposal to discuss within the IWG the use of the Q10 dummy (proposed by the IWG for monitoring purpose only) for ensuring a safer level for children of different ages and heights. Moreover, he proposed modifying transitional provisions to allow CRS type approvals according to both UN Regulations Nos. 44 and 129. GRSP agreed to refer GRSP-54-36 to the IWG, incorporating all the changes to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2013/23 agreed during the session and awaiting a revised official proposal at its May 2014 session. GRSP also considered ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2013/21 concerning the configuration of CRS combining a base attached with ISOFIX anchorages to the vehicle and a shell installed on it. GRSP adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2013/21 amended (as reproduced in ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2014/33) and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1, for consideration and vote at their March 2014 sessions as draft Supplement 3 to the UN Regulation. GRSP also recommended experts to provide, by the May 2014 session, a draft brochure text as part of coordinated information campaign on UN Regulation No. 129.
58. The World Forum considered the draft amendment under agenda item 4.14.1 and recommended its submission to AC.1 for voting.
|
|
0
|
3
|
|
|
|
00 series of amendments
| Supplement 4
(2015)
|
Proposal as approved by the GRSP to prohibit the use of Y-shaped belt on forward-facing child restraint systems. This proposal aligns UN R129 with provisions already in UN R44.
|
WP.29/2015/43
|
|
0
|
4
|
|
|
|
02 series of amendments
(2017)
|
Proposal to introduce CRS Informal Group “phase 2” amendments regarding the approval of booster-seat CRS category (booster seat with backrest) into UN R129.
|
WP.29/2016/107
|
|
Discussion from 170th WP.29 session
|
|
76. The representative of Consumers International (CI) welcomed the adoption of the 02 series of amendments of UN Regulation No. 129, which can be seen as a next milestone in the development of this Regulation. He highlighted that by extending the i-Size concept to children up to 135cm, several consumer issues will be addressed and that also bigger children now will benefit from higher levels of protection. He hoped that the corresponding amendment of UN Regulation No. 16 will be implemented in the short term, allowing it to be operational simultaneously with phase 2 of Regulation No. 129. Finally, he offered the support of CI in the further development of the regulation.
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
00 series of amendments
| Supplement 5
(2017)
|
Proposal to - amend the toxicity and flammability declarations via references to EN71 (European safety standards)
- align paragraph 6.6.3.1. with the 01 series of amendments,
- to align requirements in 7.1.3.1 to test methods in 8.1.2.4.,
- add tolerances to better define the test method in paragraph 8.1.2.3.,
- improve the specifications for the measurement of dimensions C and D in Annex 23,
- align deceleration test requirements with acceleration test provisions (making explicit that it is mandatory to match the corridor for each test, and
- define the initial acceleration value under paragraph 7.3. against which the maximum deviation restriction is to be applied.
|
WP.29/2016/105
|
|
0
|
5
|
|
|
|
01 series of amendments
(2017)
|
Proposal to define provisions for “Integral” and “Non-Integral” Enhanced Child Restraint Systems (ECRS). “Integral” refers to systems where the child is restrained only by components which comprise the ECRS (e.g. strap harness, impact shield, etc.), and not by means connected directly to the vehicle (e.g. adult seat belt). “Non-Integral”, then, refers to systems where the child is retained by use of the adult seat belt connected directly to the vehicle. This proposal represents “Phase 1” in the development of UN R129.
|
WP.29/2016/38
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2016/38) was adopted by the World Forum. Forty Contracting Parties out of the 51 applying UN R129 were present for the vote by AC.1. Forty voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
01 series of amendments
| Supplement 1
(2017)
|
Proposal to amend the toxicity and flammability provisions.
|
WP.29/2016/106
|
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
|
02 series of amendments
| Supplement 1
(2018)
|
Proposal to align the provisions on toxicity and flammability of materials used to manufacture Child Restraint Systems (CRS) and to update test provisions of UN Regulation introduced by the Supplement 1 to the 01 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 129. The proposal also clarifies requirements and improves the text of the 02 series of amendments, including strap positioning provisions and labeling requirements for detachable child seat impact shields.
|
WP.29/2017/63
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2017/63) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-nine Contracting Parties out of the 53 applying UN R129 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-nine voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
2
|
1
|
|
|
|
02 series of amendments
| Supplement 2
(2018)
|
Proposal to amend UN R129 in line with the proposal to amend UN R14 (document GRSP/2017/8) in order to separate child restraint provisions (including ISOFIX anchorage provisions) into a new UN Regulation. The ISOFIX amendment to UN R14 has been introduced to facilitate the establishment of the International Whole Vehicle Type Approval (IWVTA) regulation by limiting the scope of UN R14 to adult safety belts.
The proposal also incorporates amendments developed by the CRS informal group to enable the type approval of integral and non-integral Enhanced Child Restraint Systems equipped with an impact shield.
Lastly, the proposal introduces a provision to prohibit use of the Unique Identifier allowed under Revision 3 of the 1958 Agreement as an alternative to the current approval mark. In the case of child restraint systems, the approval mark contains important information for users.
|
WP.29/2017/126
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2017/126) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-seven Contracting Parties out of the 52 applying UN R129 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-seven voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
2
|
2
|
|
|
|
01 series of amendments
| Supplement 2
(2018)
|
Proposal to update the module label, clarify the text, and make editorial corrections to the 01 series of amendments.
|
WP.29/2017/62
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2017/62) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-nine Contracting Parties out of the 53 applying UN R129 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-nine voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
|
|
02 series of amendments
| Supplement 3
(2018)
|
Proposal to specify the proper use and behavior of an adult safety-belt used to install a non-integral Enhanced CRS during dynamic tests. These instructions are present in UN R44, but not in UN R129. Therefore, this proposal would align the two regulations. The proposal also clarifies that the opening force applied to the ISOFIX attachments of a complete seat or of a seat component under the test protocol is 50 ± 1 N.
|
WP.29/2018/42
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2018/42) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-seven Contracting Parties out of the 53 applying UN R129 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-seven voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
2
|
3
|
|
|
|
00 series of amendments
| Supplement 7
(2018)
|
Proposal to delete the requirement for chest deflection and abdominal pressure data under the dynamic tests. These criteria were not required in this (original or 00 series) version of UN R129.
|
WP.29/2018/40
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2018/40) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-seven Contracting Parties out of the 53 applying UN R129 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-seven voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
0
|
7
|
|
|
|
01 series of amendments
| Supplement 4
(2018)
|
Proposal to clarify that the opening force applied to the ISOFIX attachments of a complete seat or of a seat component under the test protocol is 50 ± 1 N.
|
WP.29/2018/41
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2018/41) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-seven Contracting Parties out of the 53 applying UN R129 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-seven voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
1
|
4
|
|
|
|
03 series of amendments
(2018)
|
Proposal to introduce provisions for the approval of universal belted and specific-to-vehicle belted child restraint systems. The proposal also introduces provisions for lower tether straps. This proposal represents the culmination of the “Phase 3” amendments prepared by the CRS informal group. This amendment concludes the three-phased program to develop a new UN Regulation for CRS to supersede UN R44.
|
WP.29/2018/45
|
|
Discussion from 175th WP.29 session
|
|
79. The World Forum considered the draft amendments under agenda items 4.6.1 to 4.6.8, and recommended their submission to AC.1 for voting.
80. The Chair of GRSP presented proposals on ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2018/44 and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2018/45 under agenda items 4.6.9 and 4.6.10, to amend UN Regulations No. 14 and No. 129, in the spirit of providing the highest level of safety for children.
81. The proposal on amendments to UN Regulation No. 129 was commended by CI as the last phase for a full replacement of UN Regulation No. 44, which had not been designed to fully avoid the wrong use of child restraint systems. He recalled that the shortcomings of UN Regulation No. 44, had been raised by consumer groups ten years ago which had led to the decision to stop further developing UN Regulation No. 44 and to start a new UN Regulation. He declared that his organization and ANEC were satisfied by UN Regulations No. 129 that entails not only better protection of children, but makes Child Restraint Systems (CRS) easier to use. He expressed his thank to all the stakeholders involved, and in particular Mr. P. Castaing, Chair of the IWG, for their contributions to this result. He recommended the phasing out of UN Regulation No. 44 as early as possible to avoid confusion among consumers and allow only UN Regulation No. 129 that offers the highest level of protection. He clarified that since 1 September 2017, integral ISOFIX CRS were no longer approved under UN Regulation No. 44, and this would be the case also for non-integral Group 2 and Group 2/3 seats from 1 September 2019. Finally, he announced that for belted integral systems his organization would submit a proposal at the GRSP 2018 December session to stop type approvals according to UN Regulation No. 44.
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2018/45) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-seven Contracting Parties out of the 53 applying UN R129 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-seven voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
03 series of amendments
| Supplement 1
(2019)
|
Proposal to - require that the shoulder strap positioner, if any, and the buckle open independently of each other in order to satisfy the requirement that the buckle can be opened by a single action;
- align end-user information provisions with that adopted for UN R44;
- reinsert text omitted during the transcription of the adopted texts of Supplement 3 to the 01 series of amendments and Supplement 2 to the 02 series of amendments; and
- harmonize airbag warning labels regarding the correct use of a child restraint system in a seating position equipped with an activated frontal airbag in order to prohibit the display of additional information unrelated to child safety.
|
WP.29/2018/139
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2018/139) was adopted by the World Forum. Forty-one Contracting Parties out of the 53 applying UN R129 were present for the vote by AC.1. Forty-one voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
3
|
1
|
|
|
|
01 series of amendments
| Supplement 5
(2019)
|
Proposal to - require that the shoulder strap positioner, if any, and the buckle open independently of each other in order to satisfy the requirement that the buckle can be opened by a single action;
- align end-user information provisions with that adopted for UN R44;
- reinsert text omitted during the transcription of the adopted texts of Supplement 3 to the 01 series of amendments and Supplement 2 to the 02 series of amendments; and
- harmonize airbag warning labels regarding the correct use of a child restraint system in a seating position equipped with an activated frontal airbag in order to prohibit the display of additional information unrelated to child safety.
|
WP.29/2018/137
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2018/137) was adopted by the World Forum. Forty-one Contracting Parties out of the 53 applying UN R129 were present for the vote by AC.1. Forty-one voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
1
|
5
|
|
|
|
02 series of amendments
| Supplement 4
(2019)
|
Proposal to - require that the shoulder strap positioner, if any, and the buckle open independently of each other in order to satisfy the requirement that the buckle can be opened by a single action;
- align end-user information provisions with that adopted for UN R44;
- reinsert text omitted during the transcription of the adopted texts of Supplement 3 to the 01 series of amendments and Supplement 2 to the 02 series of amendments; and
- harmonize airbag warning labels regarding the correct use of a child restraint system in a seating position equipped with an activated frontal airbag in order to prohibit the display of additional information unrelated to child safety.
|
WP.29/2018/138
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2018/138) was adopted by the World Forum. Forty-one Contracting Parties out of the 53 applying UN R129 were present for the vote by AC.1. Forty-one voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
2
|
4
|
|
|
|
00 series of amendments
| Supplement 6
(2018)
|
In order to facilitate the establishment of an International Whole Vehicle Type Approval, provisions concerning requirements for child restraint systems are being extracted from UN R14 into a new regulation. Therefore, this proposal would update the references to UN R14 in UN R129 to enable recognition of anchorage approvals under the adult safety belt regulation (UN R14 as amended) and the new child restraint anchorage regulation.
|
WP.29/2017/124
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2017/124) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-seven Contracting Parties out of the 52 applying UN R129 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-seven voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
0
|
6
|
|
|
|
01 series of amendments
| Supplement 3
(2018)
|
Proposal to amend UN R129 in line with the proposal to amend UN R14 (document GRSP/2017/8) in order to separate child restraint provisions (including ISOFIX anchorage provisions) into a new UN Regulation. The ISOFIX amendment to UN R14 has been introduced to facilitate the establishment of the International Whole Vehicle Type Approval (IWVTA) regulation by limiting the scope of UN R14 to adult safety belts.
The proposal also incorporates amendments developed by the CRS informal working group to enable the type approval of integral and non-integral Enhanced Child Restraint Systems equipped with an impact shield.
Lastly, the proposal would introduce a provision prohibiting the use of the Unique Identifier allowed under the Revision 3 of the 1958 Agreement as an alternative to the current approval mark. In the case of child restraint systems, the approval mark contains important information for users.
|
WP.29/2017/125
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2017/125) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-seven Contracting Parties out of the 52 applying UN R129 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-seven voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
1
|
3
|
|
|
|
00 series of amendments
| Supplement 8
(2019)
|
Proposal to align end-user information provisions with those adopted for UN R44.
|
WP.29/2018/136
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2018/136) was adopted by the World Forum. Forty-one Contracting Parties out of the 53 applying UN R129 were present for the vote by AC.1. Forty-one voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
0
|
8
|
|
|
|
03 series of amendments
| Supplement 2
(2020)
|
Proposal to - introduce new and modified labeling and to clarify packaging information to distinguish between forward-facing-only, rear-facing-only, and convertible CRS in order to reduce the risk of users misusing these enhanced CRS
- clarify that assessment of the DE plane only applies to rearward-facing Child Restraint Systems (CRS) in UN Regulation No. 44 and therefore does not apply to forward-facing child restraints that maintain structure of the child restraint behind the head of the dummy
- specify the dimensions of the approval number
- update i-Size universal ISOFIX, Specific Vehicle ISOFIX, i-Size Booster seat and Specific Vehicle Booster seat numbering (omitted in WP29-2018-045)
- rearrange the dimensions mark for arrangements of the approval mark where used in combination with the module mark
- change the 145 cm stature of the Specific Vehicle Booster seat to 150 cm stature as this is the correct upper limit, and
- clarify that Conformity of Production assessments shall be conducted under the same requirements as those of the original approval or, if applicable, the extension of the approval.
|
WP.29/2019/40
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2019/40) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-nine Contracting Parties out of the 54 applying UN R129 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-nine voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
3
|
2
|
|
|
|
00 series of amendments
| Supplement 9
(2020)
|
Proposal to - introduce new and modified labeling and to clarify packaging information to distinguish between forward-facing-only, rear-facing-only, and convertible CRS in order to reduce the risk of users misusing these enhanced CRS, and
- clarify that assessment of the DE plane only applies to rearward-facing Child Restraint Systems (CRS) in UN Regulation No. 44 and therefore does not apply to forward-facing child restraints that maintain structure of the child restraint behind the head of the dummy.
|
WP.29/2019/37
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2019/37) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-nine Contracting Parties out of the 54 applying UN R129 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-nine voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
0
|
9
|
|
|
|
02 series of amendments
| Supplement 5
(2020)
|
Proposal to - introduce new and modified labeling and to clarify packaging information to distinguish between forward-facing-only, rear-facing-only, and convertible CRS in order to reduce the risk of users misusing these enhanced CRS
- clarify that assessment of the DE plane only applies to rearward-facing Child Restraint Systems (CRS) in UN Regulation No. 44 and therefore does not apply to forward-facing child restraints that maintain structure of the child restraint behind the head of the dummy
- specify the dimensions of the approval number
- correct the term “Regulation No. 129-02” to “UN Regulation No. 129/02”
- change the 145 cm stature of the Specific Vehicle Booster seat to the 150 cm stature as this is the upper limit, and
- modify the approval markings for consistency between technical services and approval authorities and between the labels of products approved under the 02 and 03 series.
|
WP.29/2019/39
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2019/39) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-nine Contracting Parties out of the 54 applying UN R129 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-nine voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
2
|
5
|
|
|
|
01 series of amendments
| Supplement 6
(2020)
|
Proposal to - introduce new and modified labeling and to clarify packaging information to distinguish between forward-facing-only, rear-facing-only, and convertible CRS in order to reduce the risk of users misusing these enhanced CRS, and
- clarify that assessment of the DE plane only applies to rearward-facing Child Restraint Systems (CRS) in UN Regulation No. 44 and therefore does not apply to forward-facing child restraints that maintain structure of the child restraint behind the head of the dummy.
|
WP.29/2019/38
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2019/38) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-nine Contracting Parties out of the 54 applying UN R129 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-nine voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
1
|
6
|
|
|
|
03 series of amendments
| Corrigendum 1
(Formal WP.29 review)
|
Proposition de rectificatif 1 à la série 03 d’amendements au Règlement ONU no 129 (Dispositifs améliorés de retenue pour enfants): Proposal to align the French version with the adopted English version of the text (reference document WP.29/2018/45).
|
WP.29/2019/59
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2019/59) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-nine Contracting Parties out of the 54 applying UN R129 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-nine voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
3
|
|
1
|
|
|
00 series of amendments
| Corrigendum 3
(Formal WP.29 review)
|
Предложение по исправлению 3 к первоначальному варианту Правил ООН № 129 (усовершенствованные детские удерживающие системы): English wording “Upper neck tension force” corresponds to the following Russian wording “Сжимающая сила верхней части шеи”. English wording “Upper neck flexion moment” corresponds to the following Russian wording “Изгибающий момент верхней части шеи”.
|
WP.29/2019/58
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2019/58) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-nine Contracting Parties out of the 54 applying UN R129 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-nine voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
0
|
|
3
|
|
|
00 series of amendments
| Corrigendum 2
(Adopted text published)
|
Proposal to improve the translation into Russian of the text originally adopted in its English version and to correct a typographical error in the Russian text.
|
WP.29/2016/104
|
|
0
|
|
2
|
|
|
03 series of amendments
| Supplement 3
(2020)
|
Proposal to include booster cushion without a backrest within the scope of the 03 series of amendments to UN R129.
|
WP.29/2019/109
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2019/109) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-nine Contracting Parties out of the 54 applying UN R129 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-nine voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
3
|
3
|
|
|
|
00 series of amendments
| Supplement 10
(2021)
|
Proposal to update a reference with the new European Committee for Standardization (CEN) published EN 71-3:2019 on 10 April 2019 and to delete a cut-and-paste error in Annex 6, Appendix 2 taken from UN R44 referring to ECRS as in the “restricted” category which does not exist in UN R129.
|
WP.29/2020/55
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2020/55) was adopted by the World Forum. Forty-two Contracting Parties out of the 55 applying UN R129 were present for the vote by AC.1. Forty-two voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
0
|
10
|
|
|
|
01 series of amendments
| Supplement 7
(2021)
|
Proposal to update a reference with the new European Committee for Standardization (CEN) published EN 71-3:2019 on 10 April 2019, to delete a cut-and-paste error in Annex 6, Appendix 2 taken from UN R44 referring to ECRS as in the “restricted” category which does not exist in UN R129, and to reconcile and consolidate various references to tolerances for the internal geometry assessment.
|
WP.29/2020/56
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2020/56) was adopted by the World Forum. Forty-two Contracting Parties out of the 55 applying UN R129 were present for the vote by AC.1. Forty-two voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
1
|
7
|
|
|
|
02 series of amendments
| Supplement 6
(2021)
|
Proposal to clarify the requirements for the type approval category of booster seats over 135 cm, to update a reference with the new European Committee for Standardization (CEN) published EN 71-3:2019 on 10 April 2019, to delete a cut-and-paste error in Annex 6, Appendix 2 taken from UN R44 referring to ECRS as in the “restricted” category which does not exist in UN R129, and to reconcile and consolidate various references to tolerances for the internal geometry assessment.
|
WP.29/2020/57
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2020/57) was adopted by the World Forum. Forty-two Contracting Parties out of the 55 applying UN R129 were present for the vote by AC.1. Forty-two voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
2
|
6
|
|
|
|
03 series of amendments
| Supplement 4
(2021)
|
|
WP.29/2020/58
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2020/58) was adopted by the World Forum. Forty-two Contracting Parties out of the 55 applying UN R129 were present for the vote by AC.1. Forty-two voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
3
|
4
|
|
|
|
03 series of amendments
| Supplement 5
(Adopted by WP.29)
|
Proposal to clarify - provisions including the Test Report Template and Dimension Assessment Method
- that specific vehicle belted Enhanced Child Restraint Systems (ECRS) may be fitted with a support leg, top tether and lower tether attachments.
This proposal also amends the existing support leg volume to improve the compatibility between the support leg volume and the Child Restraint Fixtures used for accessing the external dimensions of an ECRS and introduces provisions for a Digital User Guide.
|
WP.29/2021/63/Rev.1
|
|
Discussion from 184th WP.29 session
|
|
94. The World Forum considered draft amendments under agenda items 4.6.1 to 4.6.3. and recommended their submission to AC.1 for voting, subject to the following modification of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2021/63/Rev.1 (agenda item 4.6.2):
Paragraph 4.14., renumber as 4.15.
In Annex 27, throughout the text, replace “Figure 0(c)” with “Figure 3(c)” and “Figure 0(d)” with “Figure 3(d)”.
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2021/63/Rev.1, as amended by para. 94, was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-nine Contracting Parties out of the 55 applying UN R129 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-eight voted in favor with zero against and one abstaining.
|
|
3
|
5
|
|
|
|
04 series of amendments
(Formal WP.29 review)
|
Proposal to: - Clarify the single belt route principle mentioned in paragraph 3.2.2.
- Introduce definitions, requirements and a test procedure for lower tether anchorages
- Restrict use of the colour green exclusively to the marking belt route indicators.
|
WP.29/2023/109
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
00 series of amendments
| Supplement 11
(Adopted by WP.29)
|
Proposal from GRSP to clarify the application of the dynamic test procedures and specify the installation configurations to be tested.
|
WP.29/2021/119
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2021/119) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-nine Contracting Parties out of the 55 applying UN R129 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-eight voted in favor with zero against and one abstaining.
|
|
0
|
11
|
|
|
|
01 series of amendments
| Supplement 8
(Adopted by WP.29)
|
Proposal from GRSP to clarify the application of the dynamic test procedures and specify the installation configurations to be tested.
|
WP.29/2021/120
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2021/120) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-nine Contracting Parties out of the 55 applying UN R129 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-eight voted in favor with zero against and one abstaining.
|
|
1
|
8
|
|
|
|
02 series of amendments
| Supplement 7
(Adopted by WP.29)
|
Proposal from GRSP to clarify the application of the dynamic test procedures and specify the installation configurations to be tested.
|
WP.29/2021/121
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2021/121) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-nine Contracting Parties out of the 55 applying UN R129 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-eight voted in favor with zero against and one abstaining.
|
|
2
|
7
|
|
|
|
03 series of amendments
| Supplement 6
(Adopted by WP.29)
|
Proposal from GRSP to clarify the application of the dynamic test procedures and specify the installation configurations to be tested.
|
WP.29/2021/122
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2021/122) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-nine Contracting Parties out of the 55 applying UN R129 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-eight voted in favor with zero against and one abstaining.
|
|
3
|
6
|
|
|
|
03 series of amendments
| Supplement 7
(Adopted by WP.29)
|
Proposal from GRSP to clarify assessment of head containment injury criterion.
|
WP.29/2022/65
|
|
3
|
7
|
|
|
|
01 series of amendments
| Supplement 9
(Adopted by WP.29)
|
Proposal to correct editorial mistakes.
|
WP.29/2022/131
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2022/131) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-five Contracting Parties out of the 56 applying UN R129 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-four voted in favor with zero against and one abstaining.
|
|
1
|
9
|
|
|
|
02 series of amendments
| Supplement 8
(Adopted by WP.29)
|
Proposal from GRSP to make editorial corrections.
|
WP.29/2022/132
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2022/132) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-five Contracting Parties out of the 56 applying UN R129 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-four voted in favor with zero against and one abstaining.
|
|
2
|
8
|
|
|
|
03 series of amendments
| Supplement 8
(Adopted by WP.29)
|
Proposal to clarify the requirements for monitoring the chest deflection of the Q10 dummy and for correct measurement of the location of the thoracic spine, to amend the existing procedure that measures the prescriptions of the minimum sitting height for booster cushions, and to correct editorial errors in the text of the Regulation.
|
WP.29/2022/128
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2022/128) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-five Contracting Parties out of the 56 applying UN R129 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-four voted in favor with zero against and one abstaining.
|
|
3
|
8
|
|
|
|
03 series of amendments
| Supplement 9
(WP.29 amended and adopted)
|
Proposal to amend the current support leg volume to improve the compatibility between the support leg volume and the Child Restraint Fixtures used for assessing the external dimensions of an Enhanced Child Restraint System (ECRS), harmonize the vertical excursion limit for Q3 and Q6 dummies, update the references to EN Standards for toxicity and flammability, clarify the approach used in the production-qualification testing phase, and make editorial improvements.
|
WP.29/2023/51
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2023/51, as amended by para. 98 of the session report, was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-four Contracting Parties out of the 57 applying UN R129 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-four voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
3
|
9
|
|
|
|
03 series of amendments
| Supplement 10
(Adopted by WP.29)
|
Proposal to to clarify the single belt route principle mentioned in paragraph 3.2.2. and to restrict use of the colour green exclusively to the marking belt route indicators.
|
WP.29/2023/120
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2023/120) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-eight Contracting Parties out of the 57 applying UN R129 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-eight voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
|
WP.29/2023/120/Corr.1
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2023/120/Corr.1) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-eight Contracting Parties out of the 57 applying UN R129 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-eight voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
3
|
10
|
|
|
|
04 series of amendments
| Supplement 1
(Formal WP.29 review)
|
Proposal to clarify the conditions under which Enhanced Child Restraint Systems must be tested in a vehicle body shell and to allow installation of a dummy protective device on the UN R129 bench in the dynamic frontal test with a universal booster cushion.
|
WP.29/2024/44/Rev.1
|
|
4
|
1
|
|
|
|
03 series of amendments
| Supplement 11
(Formal WP.29 review)
|
Proposal to clarify the conditions under which Enhanced Child Restraint Systems must be tested in a vehicle body shell and to allow installation of a dummy protective device on the UN R129 bench in the dynamic frontal test with a universal booster cushion.
|
WP.29/2024/43/Rev.1
|
|
3
|
11
|
|
|
|
04 series of amendments
| Supplement 2
(Formal GR review)
|
Proposal to correct editorial mistakes found in the 04 series of amendments to UN R129.
|
GRSP/2024/11
|
|
4
|
2
|
|
|