|
WP.29-176-03 | UN R100: Proposal to amend the draft Supplement 5 to the 01 series (OICA)
|
Description
|
|
Amended proposal for formal document WP.29/2018/134 on transitional provisions, specifically to correct an error regarding new series type approval transition provisions which should have read “2012” rather than “2010” as erroneously used in the original submission.
|
|
Document Reference Number: WP.29-176-03
|
|
Submitted by: OICA
|
|
Document date: 25 Sep 18
|
|
Document status: Adopted by WP.29
|
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related discussions
176th WP.29 session (12-16
Nov 2018)
115. The representative of OICA presented document WP.29-176-03, containing a proposed correction to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2018/134.
116. The World Forum considered the draft amendments under agenda items 4.8.1 to 4.8.14 and recommended their submission to AC.1 for voting, subject to the following corrections: In ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2018/134, page 2, for “4 December 2010” read “4 December 2012.”
|
|
|
WP.29/2018/134 | UN R100: Proposal for Supplement 5 to the 01 series of amendments
|
Description
|
|
Proposal to amend the transitional provisions in order to explicitly confirm that approvals granted prior to the respective supplements to the 01 and 02 series of amendments and the establishment of the new guidelines on UN Regulation procedures (documents WP.29/2017/107 including Corrigendum 1 and Addendum 1) will continue to be accepted. This amendment confirms the understanding that the new procedures apply only to new approvals and do not affect previous approvals.
|
|
Document Reference Number: WP.29/2018/134
|
|
Document date: 17 Aug 18
|
|
Document status: Adopted
|
|
With 39 of the 48 Contracting Parties applying UN R100 present
and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2018/134, as amended by para. 116 of the session report per the session report,
by a vote of 39 in favor, 0 opposed, with 0 abstaining.
|
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP/2018/7 | UN R100: Proposals for Supplement 4 to the 02 series of amendments and Supplement 5 to the 01 series of amendments
Related discussions
176th WP.29 session (12-16
Nov 2018)
115. The representative of OICA presented document WP.29-176-03, containing a proposed correction to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2018/134.
116. The World Forum considered the draft amendments under agenda items 4.8.1 to 4.8.14 and recommended their submission to AC.1 for voting, subject to the following corrections: In ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2018/134, page 2, for “4 December 2010” read “4 December 2012.”
28. GRSP resumed discussion on a proposal tabled by the expert from OICA (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/7) confirming that existing type approvals, granted on the basis of the preceding series of amendments, should remain accepted. GRSP adopted the proposal not amended. The secretariat was requested to submit the proposal as draft Supplement 4 to the 02 series of amendments and as draft Supplement 5 to the 01 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 100, for consideration and vote at the November 2018 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1.
|
|
|
WP.29/2018/141 | UN R16: Proposal for the 08 series of amendments
|
Description
|
|
Proposal to: - harmonize airbag warning labels regarding the correct use of a child restraint system in a seating position equipped with an activated frontal airbag in order to prohibit the display of additional information unrelated to child safety, and
- clarify that only a 3-point-belt shall be permitted for the driver seating position in order to address differing interpretations among Technical Services regarding which requirements apply for driver position seat-belt approval.
As from 1 September 2020, authorities will not be obliged to accept applicable type approvals to the preceding series of amendments that were first issued on or after 1 September 2020. As from 1 September 2022, they will not be obliged to accept any applicable approvals to the preceding series. These transitional provisions only apply to vehicles equipped with airbags. Approvals for seat belt and restraint systems remain valid.
|
|
Document Reference Number: WP.29/2018/141
|
|
Document date: 22 Aug 18
|
|
Document status: Adopted
|
|
With 37 of the 47 Contracting Parties applying UN R16 present
and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2018/141 by a vote of 37 in favor,
0 opposed, with 0 abstaining.
|
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP/2017/27 | Collective amendments to UN Regulations Nos. 16, 44, 94, 129 and 137
GRSP-63-23 | UN R16: Proposal for a 08 series of amendments
GRSP-63-01/Rev.1 | UN R16, 44 94, 129 and 137: Proposal for collective amendments
Related discussions
176th WP.29 session (12-16
Nov 2018)
117. The representative of the United States of America presented proposals on ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2018/141 and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2018/142 under agenda items 4.8.15 and 4.7.16, to amend UN Regulations Nos. 16 and 17. The World Forum recommended their submission to AC.1 for voting.
39. The expert from OICA introduced GRSP-62-14, as an alternative proposal to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/27 tabled by the expert from EC, concerning the information in the airbag warning label on the correct installation of CRS on a passenger seat with an activated frontal airbag. He suggested that the proposal should be adopted as a new series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 16 (Safety-belts) instead of a Supplement and to regroup these kind of requirements in UN Regulation No. 16 only. He also underlined the problem of translation in all languages of the detailed information, which makes reference to the warning, that should be contained in the owner’s manual.
40. The expert from Australia explained that his country requires vehicles to be fitted with an airbag warning label through a national rule that requires vehicles to meet UN Regulation No. 94. He added that although his country also had a national rule that incorporates UN Regulation No. 16, this rule does not require vehicles to meet the airbag warning label requirements of UN Regulation No. 16. Therefore, he stated that removing the requirement for an airbag warning label from UN Regulation No. 94 would create a loophole, which would allow vehicles to be supplied to the Australian market without any airbag warning label.
41. GRSP agreed to resume discussion on this subject at its May 2018 session. The secretariat was requested to distribute GRSP-62-14 with an official symbol at the next session awaiting a possible revised proposal submitted by the expert from OICA.
18. The expert from Germany introduced GRSP-63-23, to clarify which requirements should be applied to approve the safety-belt of the driver’s. GRSP endorsed the proposal and agreed to finalize its discussion by combining GRSP-63-23 with GRSP-63-01-Rev.1 under agenda item 24 (see para. 42 below).
42. The expert from EC introduced GRSP-63-01-Rev.1, amending ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/27 on the information of the airbag warning label about correctly installing CRS on a passenger seat with an activated frontal airbag. GRSP noted that the proposal also incorporated GRSP-63-01-Rev.1 (see para. 18 above). GRSP adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/27, as amended by Annex X to the session report. The secretariat was requested to submit the proposal for consideration and vote at the November 2018 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1 as: - Draft 08 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 16
- Draft Supplement 15 to the 04 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 44
- Draft Supplement 1 to the 03 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 94
- Part of (see paras. 31 and 34 above) draft Supplement 5 to the 01 series of amendments, as part of (see paras. 31 and 34 above) draft Supplement 4 to the 02 series of amendments and as part of (see paras. 31 and 34 above) draft Supplement 1 to the 03 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 129 and
- Draft Supplement 2 to the 01 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 137.
|
|
|
WP.29/2018/142 | UN R17: Proposal for the 09 series of amendments
|
Description
|
|
Proposal to require seat belt components such as retractors to remain functional if damaged during the load-retention test according to Annex 9 of UN R17. Such components have occasionally been damaged during testing such that their functionality has been impaired. In order to ensure adequate occupant safety, this proposal would require all safety-belt components to be included in the test installation and require post-test inspection to confirm the continued functionality. The transitional provisions phase in the new requirements during September 2020-September 2022.
|
|
Document Reference Number: WP.29/2018/142
|
|
Document date: 27 Aug 18
|
|
Document status: Adopted
|
|
With 38 of the 48 Contracting Parties applying UN R17 present
and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2018/142 by a vote of 38 in favor,
0 opposed, with 0 abstaining.
|
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP/2018/4 | UN R17: Proposal for the 09 series of amendments
Related discussions
176th WP.29 session (12-16
Nov 2018)
117. The representative of the United States of America presented proposals on ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2018/141 and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2018/142 under agenda items 4.8.15 and 4.7.16, to amend UN Regulations Nos. 16 and 17. The World Forum recommended their submission to AC.1 for voting.
19. The expert from Germany introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/4, following the discussions at the December 2018 session of GRSP, which aimed to clarify that safety-belts and their components should continue to function after the load retention test. GRSP adopted the proposal as amended in Annex VI to the session report. The secretariat was requested to submit the proposal as draft 09 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 17 for consideration and vote at the November 2018 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1.
|
|
