|
85. The Secretary of the Working Party on Road Safety (WP.1) informed the World Forum that his group continued considering WP.29 proposals to amend the 1968 Vienna Convention on Road Traffic in view of aligning its provisions with those of the vehicle regulations developed in the framework of the 1958 and 1998 Agreements. Referring to Annex V to the Convention, he added that WP.1 would consider an updated version of ECE/TRANS/WP.1/2011/4/Rev.1 at its September 2013 session. He expected that WP.1 would continue consideration of the requirement specifying that “every driver shall at all
times be able to control his vehicle” as well as the “Advanced Driver Assistance System (ADAS)” definition on the basis of ECE/TRANS/WP.1/2012/8 and the documents submitted by Germany (WP.29-160-31) and by Belgium, France, Italy, Sweden and the United States (WP.29-160-32). The latter contained the result of the discussion of the WP.1 informal expert group. The representative of OICA introduced a proposal (WP.29-160-16) on the subject of the driver’s control, converging in principle with WP.29-160-31. Therefore, the World Forum invited the representatives of Germany and OICA to submit a joint proposal for consideration at the September 2013 session of WP.1.
|
WP.1/2012/8 | Consistency between the Convention on Road Traffic and Vehicle Regulations
|
Consistency between the Convention on Road Traffic and Vehicle Regulations
|
|
Reference Number: WP.1/2012/8
|
|
Proposed amendments to the Convention on Road Traffic (1968 Vienna Convention) in order to eliminate inconsistencies between the Convention and the vehicle regulations established by WP.29, especially with regard to driver-assist systems and the concept of driver responsibility for vehicle behavior.
|
|
Meeting Sessions: 158th WP.29 session (13-16
Nov 2012)
|
|
Document date: 11 Jul 12
|
|
Relevant to
|
|
View full document file for more information
|
WP.1/2011/4/Rev.1 | Consistency between the Convention on Road Traffic (1968) and Vehicle Technical Regulations
WP.29-160-16 | 1968 Vienna Convention on Road Traffic: OICA proposal for WP.1 and WP.29 consideration
|
1968 Vienna Convention on Road Traffic: OICA proposal for WP.1 and WP.29 consideration
|
|
Reference Number: WP.29-160-16
|
|
The requirement that “every driver shall at all times be able to control his vehicle” has recently given rise to discussions regarding the compatibility of the Convention with modern driver assistance systems. This proposal offers language to set parameters for the use of automated systems.
|
|
Submitted by: OICA
|
|
Meeting Sessions: 160th WP.29 session (25-28
Jun 2013)
|
|
Document date: 05 Jun 13
|
|
Relevant to
|
|
View full document file for more information
|
WP.29-160-32 | Consistency between the Convention on Road Traffic (1968) and Vehicle Technical Regulations
|
Consistency between the Convention on Road Traffic (1968) and Vehicle Technical Regulations
|
|
Reference Number: WP.29-160-32
|
|
WP.1 document, prepared by Belgium, France, Italy, Sweden, and the United States transmitted to WP.29 by Germany, proposing revisions to the Vienna Convention in order to address the rise in automated driver assistance systems.
|
|
Submitted by: Germany
|
|
Meeting Sessions: 160th WP.29 session (25-28
Jun 2013)
|
|
Document date: 24 Jun 13
|
|
Relevant to
|
|
View full document file for more information
|
WP.29-160-31 | Consistency between the Convention on Road Traffic (1968) and Vehicle Technical Regulations
|
Consistency between the Convention on Road Traffic (1968) and Vehicle Technical Regulations
|
|
Reference Number: WP.29-160-31
|
|
German proposals for revision of the Vienna Convention to address the rise of automated driver assistance systems which currently would conflict with ‘driver always in control of the vehicle’ provisions.
|
|
Submitted by: Germany
|
|
Meeting Sessions: 160th WP.29 session (25-28
Jun 2013)
|
|
Document date: 24 Jun 13
|
|
Relevant to
|
|
View full document file for more information
|
|