The proposal seeks to clarify that Field of Vision Assistant (FVA) are not to be considered with regard to the visibility requirement during night and day in paragraph 5.2., since the speed displayed by the FVA is not the primary source of information.
Proposal to further take into account the impact of the modified requirement for the height of the lower edge of LPD on the Contracting Parties, including the need to adapt the infrastructure and to ensure equal treatment of all Contracting Parties signatories to this UN Regulation.
Proposal to resolve such an inconsistency with UN R125 to harmonize the location of the lower datum point (at 5°) of the angle of obstruction requirement in paragraph 5.1.3. (at 4°).
Proposal to amend to meet the visibility requirements of UN R125, there is a notch in the lower edge of the black band of the front window in some vehicles. This is required to satisfy the requirements of UN-R125, but is considered to be meaningless for driving vision and needs to be corrected.
Proposal to clarify the definition of bi-directional vehicle.
Proposal for withdrawal based on to highlight the broader implications for vehicle design and usability for consumers resulting from this proposal. The lowering of the sideguard and reduction in ramp angle will give reduced flexibility for vehicles and trailer combinations in certain applications (i.e. loading roll- on, roll-off vessels) and conflict with the road surface and local infrastructure (i.e. grounding out), which will lead to damage or reduced life of sideguards.
Proposal to clarify the obligations of the manufacturer in relation to the provision of information regarding the location and safe use of emergency exits and fire extinguishers