8. The Chair recalled the purpose of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2012/11 on introducing an electro-hydraulic transmission for electrical brake systems. The expert from Germany reported on the progress made. He added that a revised proposal might be submitted for consideration at the September 2013 session of GRRF. GRRF agreed to resume the discussion at its next session, keeping the document as a reference.

9. The expert from Japan introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2013/3, superseding ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2011/34 and proposing clarification on the reference to Regulation No. 10 in Regulations Nos. 13 and 13-H. The expert from OICA introduced GRRF-74-13, proposing a similar amendment to Regulations Nos. 13 and 13-H but also amending Regulations Nos. 79 and 89 as well as the new Regulations on Advance Emergency Braking System (AEBS) and Lane Departure Warning System (LDWS). Following the discussion, the expert from the Russian Federation withdrew GRRF-74-33. GRRF agreed to reconsider GRRF-74-13 at its next session on the basis of an official document.

10. The expert from Germany introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2012/21, proposing to remove the signature of the Type Approval Authority from the test report defined in Annex 12 of Regulation No. 13. GRRF adopted this document and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration at their June 2013 sessions as part of draft Supplement 10 to the 11 series of amendments to Regulation No. 13 (see para. 5).

13. The expert from OICA presented GRRF-74-11 superseding ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2012/16, to align Regulation No. 13-H with FMVSS 135 on electric vehicle requirement with special regard to the regenerative braking system. GRRF requested the secretariat to submit the proposal as reproduced in Annex VIII to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration at their June 2013 sessions as part of the draft Supplement 10 to the 11 series of amendments to Regulation No. 13 and draft Supplement 15 to the 00 series of amendments to Regulation No. 13-H.

14. The expert from the Russian Federation introduced GRRF-74-02 proposing a correction in the Russian version of Regulation No. 13. GRRF adopted this proposal as reproduced below and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration at their June 2013 sessions as draft Corrigendum 4 to the 11 series of amendments to Regulation No. 13 (Russian only).

Paragraph 5.2.1.33. (Russian only), amend to read:
“5.2.1.33. Транспортные средства категории N1, имеющие не более трех осей, могут быть оснащены функцией обеспечения устойчивости…”.

15. The expert from the Netherlands introduced GRRF-74-14, proposing an amendment to Regulation No. 13. GRRF agreed on this proposal as reproduced below and requested the secretariat to submit the proposal to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration at their June 2013 sessions as part of the draft Supplement 10 to the 11 series of amendments to Regulation No. 13 (see para. 10).

Annex 10, paragraph 4.1.2., correct to read:
“4.1.2. The provision of paragraph 4.1.1. does not have to be fulfilled, if a semi-trailer with a K_c factor less than 0.95 meets at least the braking performance specified in paragraph 3.1.2.1. or in paragraph 3.1.3.1., as appropriate, of Annex 4 to this Regulation.”

16. The expert from CLEPA introduced GRRF-74-31, proposing corrections and clarifications to Regulation No. 13. GRRF agreed to reconsider this proposal at its September 2013 session, based on an official document, which the expert from CLEPA volunteered to prepare.