| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document title | Tyre abrasion: Proposal for a new UN Regulation | ||||||||||
| Date | 23 Jun 2025 | Proposal for a new UN Regulation for the approval of new pneumatic tyres of class C1 that conform to UN R117 with regard to their abrasion performance. | |||||||||
| Status | Formal GR review | ||||||||||
| Rulemaking area(s) | |||||||||||
| Meeting(s) | |||||||||||
| Related documents | |||||||||||
| GRBP-82-29 | Tyre abrasion: Proposal for amendments to the draft new UN Regulation (Formal GR review) | ||||||||||
| GRBP-82-37 | UN R Tyres with regard to abrasion performance | ||||||||||
| GRBP-83-32/Rev.1 | Tyre abrasion: Proposal to replace document GRBP/2025/27 (Formal GR review) | ||||||||||
| GRBP-83-38 | Tyre abrasion: Proposal to amend documents GRBP/2025/27 and GRBP-83-32 | ||||||||||
| GRBP-83-40 | Tyre abrasion: Position on the draft new UN Regulation | ||||||||||
| GRBP/2025/28 | UN R117: Proposal for Supplement 4 to the 04 series of amendments (Formal GR review) | ||||||||||
| TA-37-05 | Tyre abrasion: Feedback on document GRBP/2025/27 (proposal for new UN Regulation) | ||||||||||
| TA-42-02/Rev.2 | Tyre abrasion: Proposal for acceleration calculation | ||||||||||
| TA-42-04/Rev.1 | Tyre abrasion: Draft proprosals for amendments to GRBP/2025/27 | ||||||||||
| TA-43-06 | Tyre abrasion: Draft proposal to amend document GRBP/2025/27 | ||||||||||
| TA-44-02 | Tyre abrasion: Proposal to amend document GRBP/2025/27 | ||||||||||
| Downloads: | UNECE server | .pdf format | .docx format | GAR server | .pdf format | .docx format | |||||
| Excerpts from session reports related to this document | |||||||||||
| GRBP | Session 82 | 3-5 Sep 2025 |
16. The Co-Chairs of TF TA presented their proposals for a new UN Regulation on tyre abrasion, together with the corresponding amendments to UN Regulation No. 117 (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRBP/2025/27 as amended by GRBP-82-29 and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRBP/2025/28). GRBP noted that both ‘indoor drum’ and ‘on-road vehicle’ test methods were included on equal footing in the draft new UN Regulation, but a low level of correlation between the methods had been observed from the market assessment data, with much better results from the dedicated correlation-validation (COVA) testing campaign. GRBP also noted that the limit values for tyre abrasion remained to be determined for both Stages 1 and 2. 17. The expert of ETRTO highlighted the position of the EU tyre industry on setting the abrasion limits (GRBP-82-24, GRBP-82-25) and proposed modifications to the TF TA package of amendments (GRBP-82-37). 18. Several experts expressed the view that the drum method was not yet ready for adoption, given a low reproducibility of results in different laboratories and the need for further validation. They suggested to start first with the on-road method and add the drum method at a later stage. Some other experts were in favour of including both methods in the new Regulation from the beginning. Following an in-depth discussion on the methods and tyre abrasion limits, GRBP realized that it would not be possible to reach a consensus at this session and agreed to finalize the amendment package at the next meeting. GRBP invited experts from all Contracting Parties to actively participate in the coming TF-TA meetings to contribute to reaching a compromise at the next session. 19. The expert from India suggested to explicitly indicate that the draft new UN Regulation would apply to radial tyres only and not to bias-ply tyres. |
||||||||||