GAR

Session 181

24 Jun 2020 | Geneva

Agenda

4.6.11. Proposal for the 06 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 22 (Protective helmets)

Annotations

Documentation

(ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/66, para. 23 based on ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2019/25 as amended by Annex III to the report)

WP.29/2020/60

UN R22: Proposal for the 06 series of amendments

UN R22: Proposal for the 06 series of amendments
Reference Number: WP.29/2020/60
Consolidated update of UN R22 from the informal working group on protective helmets, including: Reference headforms (shape, dimensions) Oblique impact test method of measuring rotational acceleration Product of the spectral distribution of radiation of the signal light and standard illuminant D65 High speed particle test for visors, and Test for photochromic, liquid crystal visors.
Meeting Sessions: 181st WP.29 session (24 Jun 2020)
Document date: 07 Apr 20
Document status: Adopted by WP.29
Relevant to UN Regulation No. 22 \| Helmets and Visors
Adoption Vote
This proposal (WP.29/2020/60) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-eight Contracting Parties out of the 47 applying UN R22 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-eight voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
View full document file for more information

UN R22: Proposal for the 06 series of amendments
Reference Number: WP.29/2020/60
Consolidated update of UN R22 from the informal working group on protective helmets, including: Reference headforms (shape, dimensions) Oblique impact test method of measuring rotational acceleration Product of the spectral distribution of radiation of the signal light and standard illuminant D65 High speed particle test for visors, and Test for photochromic, liquid crystal visors.
Meeting Sessions: 181st WP.29 session (24 Jun 2020)
Document date: 07 Apr 20
Document status: Adopted by WP.29
Relevant to UN Regulation No. 22 \| Helmets and Visors
Adoption Vote
This proposal (WP.29/2020/60) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-eight Contracting Parties out of the 47 applying UN R22 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-eight voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
View full document file for more information