|
UN R134 | Amendment 1 (2016)
|
Amendment 1 has been prepared purely as documentation tool. The authentic and legally binding text is WP.29/2015/53. This document incorporates the following change:
|
|
00 series of amendments | Supplement 1 (entry into force: 20 Jan 2016)
|
Based upon the adopted proposal WP.29/2015/53
|
|
|
|
Proposal to include “MFP” in the labeling requirement for hydrogen containers. MFP refers to the maximum allowable container pressure under normal use.
|
|
5 Feb 2016
|
2016-02-11 12:55:46 UTC
|
|
1
|
|
00 series of amendments | Supplement 1
Based upon the adopted proposal:
WP.29/2015/53
Proposal to include “MFP” in the labeling requirement for hydrogen containers. MFP refers to the maximum allowable container pressure under normal use.
|
|
UN R134 | Amendment 2 (2017)
|
Amendment 2 has been prepared purely as documentation tool. The authentic and legally binding text is WP.29/2016/39. This document incorporates the following change:
|
|
00 series of amendments | Supplement 2 (entry into force: 9 Feb 2017)
|
Based upon the adopted proposal WP.29/2016/39
|
|
|
|
Proposal to correct a reference in UN R134, Annex 3, paragraph 3.4. The reference to paragraph 6.2.2.2. was transposed from GTR No. 13; however, it ostensibly refers paragraph 2.2 of Annex 3 in UN R134.
|
|
22 Feb 2017
|
2017-05-31 17:42:45 UTC
|
|
2
|
|
00 series of amendments | Supplement 2
Based upon the adopted proposal:
WP.29/2016/39
Proposal to correct a reference in UN R134, Annex 3, paragraph 3.4. The reference to paragraph 6.2.2.2. was transposed from GTR No. 13; however, it ostensibly refers paragraph 2.2 of Annex 3 in UN R134.
|
|
UN R134 | Amendment 3 (2018)
|
Amendment 3 has been prepared purely as documentation tool. The authentic and legally binding text is WP.29/2017/127. This document incorporates the following change:
|
|
00 series of amendments | Supplement 3 (entry into force: 19 Jul 2018)
|
Based upon the adopted proposal WP.29/2017/127
|
|
|
|
Proposal to - align the regulation with legislation of the European Union, United States of America, and Japan,
- clarify the test procedure, including ambient temperature provisions,
- reduce unnecessary time and cost demands of the COP test procedures,
- apply the minimum burst pressure BPmin as the pressure limit in the hydrostatic pressure rupture test for COP batch testing, and
- delete the phrase “and in no case less than the value necessary to meet the stress ratio requirements” erroneously introduced into paragraph 9.3.2.1.
|
|
10 Aug 2018
|
2018-08-17 09:36:51 UTC
|
|
3
|
|
00 series of amendments | Supplement 3
Based upon the adopted proposal:
WP.29/2017/127
Proposal to - align the regulation with legislation of the European Union, United States of America, and Japan,
- clarify the test procedure, including ambient temperature provisions,
- reduce unnecessary time and cost demands of the COP test procedures,
- apply the minimum burst pressure BPmin as the pressure limit in the hydrostatic pressure rupture test for COP batch testing, and
- delete the phrase “and in no case less than the value necessary to meet the stress ratio requirements” erroneously introduced into paragraph 9.3.2.1.
|
|
UN R134 (2015)
|
UN R134 has been prepared purely as documentation tool. The authentic and legally binding text is WP.29/2014/78. This document incorporates the following change:
|
|
00 series of amendments (entry into force: 15 Jun 2015)
|
Based upon the adopted proposal WP.29/2014/78
|
|
|
|
Transposition of the HFCV GTR into a UN Regulation with the exception of the deletion of references to liquefied hydrogen.
|
|
25 Jun 2015
|
2014-12-18 11:05:11 UTC
|
|
|
|
00 series of amendments
Based upon the adopted proposal:
WP.29/2014/78
Transposition of the HFCV GTR into a UN Regulation with the exception of the deletion of references to liquefied hydrogen.
|