Final proposal prepared by the informal working group on the scope, objectives, and timetable for consideration of the environmental impact of electric vehicles and possible regulatory needs. This group expects to supplement the existing efforts of the WLTP, HDH, EFV, VPSD, and EVS informal groups.

Revised presentation on the results of a cooperative research project between China and the EU on a system to evaluate the aggregate energy consumption (including upstream and downstream elements) of electrified vehicles.

Proposal to include alternative method in the HDV GTR phase 1.

Proposal to revise the weight threshold of M₃ vehicle category from 7.5 tonnes to 12 tonnes, split N-type trucks into three categories with light-duty trucks below 5 tonnes, medium-duty trucks above 5 tonnes and N₃ below 18 tonnes, and heavy-duty trucks above 18 tonnes, adjust year and mileage limits for N₂, N₃ medium-duty trucks to 8 years or 500,000 km, and establish energy throughput requirements: M₂ 120,000 kWh, M₃≤12t 300,000 kWh, M₃>12t 500,000 kWh, N₂≤5t 200,000 kWh, N₂>5t, N₃≤18t 400,000 kWh, N₃>18t 1,200,000 kWh.

China introduces an assessment of low State of Charge Energy requirements for M-type vehicles using data from city buses and coaches. At low SOCE levels, available energy is reduced, requiring increased initial battery energy capacity to meet customer driving range expectations, leading to higher purchase costs and vehicle weight. China provides reasons supporting SOCE performance targets at an 8-year timeframe, including significant differences in vehicle types, operating conditions, business models, and battery specifications that vary by vehicle type, making uniform standards inefficient.

GTR 25 establishes alternative test and verification methods for heavy-duty vehicle energy consumption. China released test method GB/T 18386.2-2022 based on chassis dynamometers using continuous cycle and shortened methods. Test conditions include temperature of 25°C ± 5°C, initial battery SOC of 20%, and pre-conditioning soak and charge for minimum 6 hours and maximum 36 hours. The torque meter method measures road load without disabling regenerative braking, achieving resistance matching within 5% error. Test verification includes vehicle selection across mileage groups 0, 200,000, 400,000, and 600,000 km, with on-board data collection and sensor accuracy consistency analysis post-durability.

Under GTR 25, a feasibility assessment proposes introducing a 5-year mid-term performance requirement threshold together with corresponding mileage and energy-throughput limits as an intermediate verification checkpoint for battery degradation. Based on analysis of State-of-Health data from vehicles with 5-year life and mileage ranging from 250,000 km to 350,000 km, the MPR value is set at 75%, which can cover 98% battery-durability performance. Specific mileage and energy-throughput limits are established for vehicle categories M₂, M₃, N₂, and N₃.

This document proposes establishing a unified global testing method for determining system power and torque of heavy-duty hybrid electric vehicles (HD-HEV) and heavy-duty plug-in electric vehicles (HD-PEV). The proposal addresses the lack of standardized test methods by recommending hub-coupled dynamometer testing for vehicles with central drive systems and chassis dynamometer testing for other configurations. Testing should measure 30-minute continuous maximum power and torque under thermal equilibrium conditions. The document includes technical data from battery energy distribution analysis and recommends China lead formulation of this standard using chassis dynamometer verification.

Proposal to:

• Amend para. 2.1.(a) to include fuel cell electric vehicles that have more than one propulsion energy converter,
• Add fuel cell electric vehicle preparation requirements to para. 6.3. requiring run-in in accordance with manufacturers recommendations and at least 300 km of fuel cell run-in with hydrogen refueled in accordance with manufacturers recommendations,
• Amend para. 6.5. to include FCEVs in initial REESS charge requirements,
• Amend para. 6.8.1. to include fuel cell temperature in operational metrics to be monitored and recorded throughout the test,
• Retitle para. 2.6. as Fuel cell architectures, and add paras. 2.6.1., 2.6.2., and 2.6.3. specifying power determination reference points and test procedures for fuel cell architectures.

Side-by-side comparison of the initial state of charge conditions under SAE J2929 (2011-02)and QC/T743-2006.