|
9 Nov 2016
|
EVS Task Force 5 (Cell/Module/System Test Requirements): Agreed proposal on the thermal runaway test procedure (Canada, EU, OICA, and USA)
|
EVS-13-07-501
|
2016-11-09 |
Joint proposal supported by Canada, the EU, OICA, and the USA. Canada EU OICA USA |
|
21 Jan 2016
|
EVS Task Force 4 (REESS in-use test protocol): US Proposal for BMS Functionality-Sequential Fault Testing Requirements (NHTSA and USA)
|
EVSTF-06-27
|
2016-01-21 |
US proposal for sequential fault testing of battery management systems.
NHTSA USA |
|
8 Feb 2016
|
EVS Task Force 7 (Fire Resistance): Canada and US Comments on battery external-fire safety (Canada, TC, and USA)
|
EVSTF-07-02
|
2016-02-08 |
US and Canada position on the draft fire exposure test for electric vehicles. Pursuant to Canadian testing, the US and Canada do not see a need for additional testing of electric vehicles (as opposed to ICE vehicles) because the battery and electric systems do not show any cause for special concern in vehicle fires. Battery pack testing could be considered in a later phase in the development of the safety regulation if warranted.
Canada TC USA |
|
23 Feb 2016
|
EVS Task Force 1 (Protection against Water): US water exposure test explanation (NHTSA and USA)
|
EVSTF-07-13
|
2016-02-23 |
NHTSA USA |
|
28 Apr 2016
|
EVS Task Force 4 (REESS In-use Test Protocol): US responses to comments on the battery management system functionality text (NHTSA and USA)
|
EVSTF-08-03
|
2016-04-28 |
NHTSA USA |
|
13 Jun 2016
|
EVS Task Force 4 (REESS in-use test protocol): US proposal on battery management system functionality as of 10 June 2016 (NHTSA and USA)
|
EVSTF-08-60
|
2016-06-13 |
US proposal taking into account and responding to comments received from JRC (22 April 2016) and OICA (17 May 2016) NHTSA USA |
|
14 Jun 2016
|
EVS Task Force 4 (REESS in-use test protocol): US proposal for draft GTR -Vehicle controls for REESS operation (USA)
|
EVSTF-08-62
|
2016-06-14 |
Update version of document EVTS-08-60 on battery management system functionality. USA |
|
9 May 2016
|
Draft minutes of the 10th EVS informal group session (USA)
|
GRSP-59-10
|
2016-05-09 |
USA |
|
9 May 2016
|
Informal Working Group on Electric Vehicle Safety Global Technical Regulation (USA)
|
GRSP-59-11
|
2016-05-09 |
USA |
|
13 Dec 2016
|
Proposal from the United States of America on Phase 2 amendments to UN GTR No. 9 (USA)
|
GRSP-60-17
|
2016-12-13 |
Phase 2 proposes to amend the UN Global Technical Regulation No. 9 on pedestrian safety by introducing the flexible pedestrian legform impactor (FlexPLI) as a single harmonized test tool in order to enhance the level of protection for pedestrian lower legs. NHTSA has expressed concern that the injury assessment reference values (IARVs) for this GTR may not meet the needs for injury mitigation in the U.S. In order to enable the proposed Phase 2 amendment to move forward with US support, the US proposes additions to the GTR preamble to make clear its position and intentions regarding assessment of the IARV and to allow the brackets to be removed from the IARV in the draft amendment. USA |
|
8 Mar 2016
|
Trilateral White Paper - Improvement in the Implementation of the 1998 Global Agreement (EU, Japan, and USA)
|
WP.29-168-08
|
2016-03-08 |
The purpose of this paper is to provide a framework through which the delegates to the World Forum for the Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations (WP.29) and other interested stakeholders can examine the experience with the 1998 Global Agreement and agree on ideas and processes for improvement in its implementation. This version supersedes the previous documents WP.29-167-12 and WP.29/2015/108. EU Japan USA |
|
7 Jan 2016
|
Fourth progress report of the Informal Working Group on Electric Vehicle Safety (China, EU, Japan, and USA)
|
WP.29/2016/30
|
2016-01-07 |
China EU Japan USA |
|
14 Apr 2016
|
Proposal for new Special Resolution No. 2 (S.R.2) - Improvement in the implementation of the 1998 Global Agreement (USA, EU, and Japan)
|
WP.29/2016/65
|
2016-04-14 |
Proposal for a Special Resolution to provide a framework within which the representatives of the World Forum for the Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations (WP.29) and other interested stakeholders can work to improve the implementation of the 1998 Global Agreement.
USA EU Japan |