previous meeting next meeting
Geneva
(Latest 23 January 2014)
| Agenda | Formal | Informal |
Attendance
1. Adoption of the agenda
GRSP/2013/14 | Annotated provisional agenda for the 54th GRSP session
GRSP-54-06 | Running order of the agenda for the 54th GRSP session
GRSP/54 | Report of the GRSP on its 54th session Report of the Working Party on Passive Safety on its December 2013 session.
2. Global Technical Regulation No. 7 (Head restraints)
GRSP/2013/17 | Proposal for Amendment 1 to GTR No. 7 Proposal to specify a head restraint height between 720 mm and 830 mm pursuant to the work on phase 2 of GTR No. 7 which includes a new method for measuring the effective height of head restraints.
GRSP-54-18 | GTR No. 7: OICA position on head restraint height The expert group on the 2nd phase development of GTR No. 7 has proposed a new method for measuring head-restraint height and, using this method, proposed to specify heights between 720-830 mm. OICA accepts the new measurement method, but argues for keeping the current 800 mm specification on the grounds that 800 mm under the new method would be 830 mm under the old.
GRSP-54-18/Rev.1 | GTR No. 7: OICA position on head restraint height (revised) The expert group on the 2nd phase development of GTR No. 7 has proposed a new method for measuring head-restraint height and, using this method, proposed to specify heights between 720-830 mm. OICA accepts the new measurement method, but argues for keeping the current 800 mm specification on the grounds that 800 mm under the new method would be 830 mm under the old.
GRSP-54-23 | US comments on the proposal for Amendment 1 to GTR No. 7 The United States will not support the proposed amendment in its current form. The amendment would increase headrest heights for front outboard seating positions from 800 mm to at least 830 mm while allowing a decrease in minimum heights to 720 mm from 750mm. In addition, the amendment would allow decreased rear heights. The US believes the amendment lacks adequate evidence-based justifications for the proposed changes.
GRSP-54-28 | Status report on GTR No. 7 and the BioRID Technical Evaluation Group
GRSP-54-30 | Draft 5th progress report of the informal group on Phase 2 of GTR No. 7
GRSP/2013/24 | Draft amendment 1 (Phase 2) to GTR No. 7 Working draft of the phase 2 revisions to the global technical regulation on head restraints provided to the GRSP at its December 2013 session for informational purposes only.
GRSP-54-05 | MR1: Specifications for the 50th percentile male BioRID-II ATD Specifications for the Construction, Preparation and Certification of the 50th percentile male Biofidelic Rear Impact Dummy, (BioRID-II) anthropometric test device for inclusion in the Mutual Resolution No. 1 on test devices used in UN Regulations and GTR.
GRSP-54-20 | Japan proposal for Supplement 3 to the 08 series of amendments to Regulation No. 17 In document GRSP-54-04, CLEPA proposed changes to improve the reproducibility of the luggage impact test described in annex 9 of UN R17. Japan proposes to specify only the minimum moment of inertia in the test (where CLEPA proposed a minimum-maximum range.
GRSP-54-30 | Draft 5th progress report of the informal group on Phase 2 of GTR No. 7
GRSP/2013/24 | Draft amendment 1 (Phase 2) to GTR No. 7 Working draft of the phase 2 revisions to the global technical regulation on head restraints provided to the GRSP at its December 2013 session for informational purposes only.
3. Global Technical Regulation No. 9 (Pedestrian safety)
3. (a) Phase 2 of the global technical regulation
GRSP/2011/13 | Proposal for Amendment 2 to GTR No. 9
GRSP/2013/25 | Draft amendment [2] to Global Technical Regulation No. 9 on pedestrian safety Text prepared by the informal expert group on the Phase 2 development of the GTR on pedestrian safety to introduce the new FlexPLI lower legform test tool into the test procedures.
GRSP-54-32 | US comments on the draft amendment [2] to Global Technical Regulation No. 9 on pedestrian safety Statement of US concerns with the draft amendment to introduce the Flex PLI test tool into GTR No. 9 (document GRSP/2013/25) in particular with regard to the use of the injury assessment reference values (IARVs). US definition of the IARV will be dependent upon the outcome of a US cost-benefit analysis based upon the characteristics of the American vehicle population. The US cannot accept injury curves that do not fall within what is justifiable according to US traffic conditions.
GRSP-54-33 | Draft amendment [2] to GTR No. 9 as updated in the 9th GTR 9-Phase 2 informal group session The draft amendment to introduce the Flex PLI test tool as updated in the informal working group meeting of 16 – 17 December 2013.
GRSP-54-34 | Draft final report of the informal group on Phase 2 of GTR No. 9 Draft report in support of the proposed amendment to the pedestrian safety GTR that would introduce the Flexible Pedestrian Legform Impactor (Flex-PLI) test tool.
GRSP-54-33/Rev.1 | Draft amendment [2] to Global Technical Regulation No. 9 on pedestrian safety Updated draft amendment as revised during the 16-17 December 2013 session of the Informal Group on GTR 9-Phase 2. The amendment would introduce the Flex PLI lower legform impactor and related test procedures into the GTR on pedestrian safety protection.
GRSP-54-34/Rev.1 | Draft final report of the informal group on Phase 2 of GTR No. 9 (revised) Draft report of the GTR 9 expert group in support of the proposed amendment to the pedestrian safety GTR that would introduce the Flexible Pedestrian Legform Impactor (Flex-PLI) test tool.
GRSP-54-33/Rev.2 | Draft amendment [2] to Global Technical Regulation No. 9 on pedestrian safety Updated draft amendment as revised during the 16-17 December 2013 session of the Informal Group on GTR 9-Phase 2. The amendment would introduce the Flex PLI lower legform impactor and related test procedures into the GTR on pedestrian safety protection.
GRSP-54-08 | Proposal for Amendment [3] to global technical regulation No. 9 (Pedestrian safety) Text prepared by the European Commission and Germany to align the test requirements of UN GTR No. 9 Phase 2 with those of Amendment 2 to the UN GTR concerning the determination of the headform test points.
GRSP-54-33/Rev.2 | Draft amendment [2] to Global Technical Regulation No. 9 on pedestrian safety Updated draft amendment as revised during the 16-17 December 2013 session of the Informal Group on GTR 9-Phase 2. The amendment would introduce the Flex PLI lower legform impactor and related test procedures into the GTR on pedestrian safety protection.
GRSP-54-08 | Proposal for Amendment [3] to global technical regulation No. 9 (Pedestrian safety) Text prepared by the European Commission and Germany to align the test requirements of UN GTR No. 9 Phase 2 with those of Amendment 2 to the UN GTR concerning the determination of the headform test points.
GRSP-54-34/Rev.1 | Draft final report of the informal group on Phase 2 of GTR No. 9 (revised) Draft report of the GTR 9 expert group in support of the proposed amendment to the pedestrian safety GTR that would introduce the Flexible Pedestrian Legform Impactor (Flex-PLI) test tool.
GRSP-54-33 | Draft amendment [2] to GTR No. 9 as updated in the 9th GTR 9-Phase 2 informal group session The draft amendment to introduce the Flex PLI test tool as updated in the informal working group meeting of 16 – 17 December 2013.
GRSP-54-34/Rev.1 | Draft final report of the informal group on Phase 2 of GTR No. 9 (revised) Draft report of the GTR 9 expert group in support of the proposed amendment to the pedestrian safety GTR that would introduce the Flexible Pedestrian Legform Impactor (Flex-PLI) test tool.
3. (b) Proposal for Amendment 1
GRSP/2012/2 | Final progress report on the proposal to develop amendment 2 to GTR 9 Review of the work behind the proposal to clarify GTR 9, in particular concerning the definition of the headform testing/contact area for measurement purposes.
GRSP/2012/14 | Proposal for Amendment 2 to global technical regulation No. 9 Proposal from the EC to amend GTR No. 9 with regard to the measuring points of the headform and lower legform test procedures.
GRSP-54-08 | Proposal for Amendment [3] to global technical regulation No. 9 (Pedestrian safety) Text prepared by the European Commission and Germany to align the test requirements of UN GTR No. 9 Phase 2 with those of Amendment 2 to the UN GTR concerning the determination of the headform test points.
GRSP-54-31 | US comments on the proposed Amendment [3] to GTR No. 9 on pedestrian safety Presentation of US concerns regarding proposed definitions for locating the point of measurement (i.e. measuring point, target point, and first contact point definitions) within the test zone, changes to the test zone boundaries to clarify the adult and child Head Injury Criterion (HIC) zones, and to amend the leg form test procedure to align the leg form center plane with its measuring point. [Note: the reference to document GRSP/2011/12 does not appear to correspond with the content of the US statement. Rather, the remarks align more closely with document GRSP-54-07/Rev.1 proposing changes to the draft amendment as presented in document GRSP/2013/25).]
GRSP/2013/25 | Draft amendment [2] to Global Technical Regulation No. 9 on pedestrian safety Text prepared by the informal expert group on the Phase 2 development of the GTR on pedestrian safety to introduce the new FlexPLI lower legform test tool into the test procedures.
GRSP-48-27 | Request for clarification concerning the Pedestrian Safety GTR
GRSP-54-07/Rev.1 | Proposal for Amendment [2] to Global Technical Regulation No. 9 (revised) Proposal of amendments to address various concerns and reflect the outcomes of discussions with the experts from EC, Japan, the Netherlands, the Republic of Korea, United States of America and OICA.
GRSP-54-08 | Proposal for Amendment [3] to global technical regulation No. 9 (Pedestrian safety) Text prepared by the European Commission and Germany to align the test requirements of UN GTR No. 9 Phase 2 with those of Amendment 2 to the UN GTR concerning the determination of the headform test points.
GRSP-54-07/Rev.1 | Proposal for Amendment [2] to Global Technical Regulation No. 9 (revised) Proposal of amendments to address various concerns and reflect the outcomes of discussions with the experts from EC, Japan, the Netherlands, the Republic of Korea, United States of America and OICA.
4. Harmonization of side impact dummies
5. Global technical regulation on electric vehicles
WP.29/2012/121 | Terms of Reference of the Informal Working Group on Electric Vehicle Safety Scope and objectives of the effort to establish a global technical regulation for electric vehicles covering high voltage electrical safety, safety of electrical components, and rechargeable energy storage systems (REESS).
6. Crash compatibility
7. Regulation No. 11 (Door latches and hinges)
GRSP/2013/16 | Proposal for Supplement 4 to the 03 series of amendments to Regulation No. 11 Certain anti-theft systems fully lock every door and window in a vehicle and also deactivate interior unlock controls. This can lead to a situation where an occupant can be locked inside a vehicle with no means of exit save to break a window. This proposal would require countermeasures to prevent such a situation.
GRSP-54-16 | Proposal for Supplement 4 to the 03 series of amendments to Regulation No. 11 OICA counterproposal to the draft German text that would prohibit systems whereby an occupant could be unintentionally locked inside a vehicle, such as might occur with alarm or emergency locking systems.
8. Regulation No. 14 (Safety-belt anchorages)
GRSP/2013/4 | Proposal for Supplement 5 to the 07 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 14 Text from the International Organization of Motor Vehicle Manufacturers (OICA) proposing to exempt vehicles with one seating position per row from ISOFIX provisions since compliance would require fitment to the driver's seat.
GRSP/2011/9 | Proposal for Supplement 3 to the 07 series of amendments to Regulation No. 14
GRSP/2013/15 | Proposal for Supplement 6 to the 07 series of amendments to Regulation No. 14 The current text of UN R14 requires the installation of two ISOFIX anchorages in a vehicle. Vehicles with only one seat row are exempted from this requirement. This proposal introduces provisions for at least one set of ISOFIX anchorages in vehicles having only one seat row or having several seat rows with only one seat per row.
GRSP/2013/18 | Proposal for Supplement 6 to the 07 series of amendments to Regulation No. 14 Correction of an editorial error in Supplement 4 to the 07 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 14.
GRSP-54-19 | Proposed amendments to the draft Supplement 6 to the 07 series of amendments to Regulation No. 14 Proposal to refine the proposal concerning ISOFIX anchorages in "one seat per row" seating arrangements. OICA believes this should be an amendment rather than a supplement and proposes to refine the scope to focus on seating where a child seat can be used and in vehicles that could carry a child.
GRSP-54-19/Rev.1 | Proposed amendments to the draft Supplement 6 to the 07 series of amendments to Regulation No. 14 (Revised) Revised proposal to refine the proposal concerning ISOFIX anchorages in "one seat per row" seating arrangements and to rework the proposal as an amendment to UN R14 rather than as a supplement.
GRSP-54-19/Rev.2 | Proposed amendments to Supplement 6 to the 07 series of amendments to Regulation No. 14 (Revision 2) Revised proposal to refine the proposal concerning ISOFIX anchorages in "one seat per row" seating arrangements and to rework the proposal as an amendment to UN R14 rather than as a supplement, originally presented by Germany in document GRSP/2013/15.
GRSP-54-19/Rev.2 | Proposed amendments to Supplement 6 to the 07 series of amendments to Regulation No. 14 (Revision 2) Revised proposal to refine the proposal concerning ISOFIX anchorages in "one seat per row" seating arrangements and to rework the proposal as an amendment to UN R14 rather than as a supplement, originally presented by Germany in document GRSP/2013/15.
GRSP/2013/15 | Proposal for Supplement 6 to the 07 series of amendments to Regulation No. 14 The current text of UN R14 requires the installation of two ISOFIX anchorages in a vehicle. Vehicles with only one seat row are exempted from this requirement. This proposal introduces provisions for at least one set of ISOFIX anchorages in vehicles having only one seat row or having several seat rows with only one seat per row.
GRSP-54-19/Rev.2 | Proposed amendments to Supplement 6 to the 07 series of amendments to Regulation No. 14 (Revision 2) Revised proposal to refine the proposal concerning ISOFIX anchorages in "one seat per row" seating arrangements and to rework the proposal as an amendment to UN R14 rather than as a supplement, originally presented by Germany in document GRSP/2013/15.
GRSP-54-19 | Proposed amendments to the draft Supplement 6 to the 07 series of amendments to Regulation No. 14 Proposal to refine the proposal concerning ISOFIX anchorages in "one seat per row" seating arrangements. OICA believes this should be an amendment rather than a supplement and proposes to refine the scope to focus on seating where a child seat can be used and in vehicles that could carry a child.
9. Regulation No. 16 (Safety-belts)
GRSP/2012/25 | Proposal for Supplement 3 to the 06 series of amendments to Regulation No. 16 Pursuant to discussions from the 44th GRSP session, the secretariat has drafted this proposal to consolidate the transitional provisions of UN R16 as a basis for a discussion on simplifying and correcting the current text of the regulation.
GRSP-54-03 | Proposal for Supplement 6 to the 06 series of amendments to Regulation No. 16 Proposal based on document GRSP/2012/25 (proposal drafted by the secretariat to consolidate the transitional provisions of UN R16 as a basis for a discussion on simplifying and correcting the text) to consolidate the transitional provisions of UN R16.
10. Regulation No. 17 (Strength of seats)
GRSP/2009/15 | Alignment of Regulation No. 17 with GTR No. 7 (Head restraints) Proposal aimed at transposing Global Technical Regulation No. 7 (head restraints) into Regulation No. 17 and introducing the use of Biofidelic Rear Impact test Dummy (BioRID II) into the dynamic performance requirements.
GRSP-54-04 | Proposal for Supplement 3 to the 08 series of amendments to Regulation No. 17 Proposal to improve the reproducibility of the luggage impact test described in annex 9 of UN Regulation No. 17.
GRSP-54-20 | Japan proposal for Supplement 3 to the 08 series of amendments to Regulation No. 17 In document GRSP-54-04, CLEPA proposed changes to improve the reproducibility of the luggage impact test described in annex 9 of UN R17. Japan proposes to specify only the minimum moment of inertia in the test (where CLEPA proposed a minimum-maximum range.
GRSP-54-20 | Japan proposal for Supplement 3 to the 08 series of amendments to Regulation No. 17 In document GRSP-54-04, CLEPA proposed changes to improve the reproducibility of the luggage impact test described in annex 9 of UN R17. Japan proposes to specify only the minimum moment of inertia in the test (where CLEPA proposed a minimum-maximum range.
11. Regulation No. 22 (Protective helmets)
GRSP-54-29 | Safety Helmet Assessment and Rating Programme (SHARP) Presentation on the UK helmet safety scheme.
12. Regulation No. 29 (Cabs of commercial vehicles)
GRSP/2013/9 | Proposal for amendment to the 03 series of amendments to UN Regulation 29 Proposal from Sweden to clarify that the requirements and test methods in the 03 series of amendments are limited to category N3 vehicles and category N2 vehicles with a gross vehicle mass exceeding 7.5 tons.
GRSP/2012/19 | Proposal for amendments to the 03 series of amendments to Regulation No. 29 Proposal from Russia to delete the phrase "with separate driver's cab" from the scope of UN R29 in order to affirm that the regulation applies to all N1 and N2 category vehicles, reverting the regulation scope to the text of the 02 series of amendments.
GRSP/2013/19 | Draft Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments to Regulation No. 29 Proposal to clarify the scope of UN Regulation No. 29 and the tests to be performed on the various types of category N vehicles.
13. Regulation No. 44 (Child restraints systems)
GRSP/2013/10 | Draft Supplement 8 to UN Regulation No. 44 Text from Japan proposing to extend the overturning test to a broader range of child restraint systems.
GRSP/2013/20 | Proposal for Supplement 7 to the 04 series of amendments to Regulation No. 44 Correction of an error in the earlier Corrigendum 1 to Supplement 5 to the 03 series of UN Regulation No. 44.
14. Regulation No. 94 (Frontal collision)
GRSP-54-25 | Frontal impact: Research on chest injury criteria Presentation on Japanese research into dummy responses and chest injury measures for different seat-belt paths under the full-width rigid barrier and sled tests. Since the seat-belt path influences chest deflection results, Japan proposes that UN R94 include seat-belt path definition.
GRSP-54-27 | Draft proposal for Amendment [3] to UN Regulation No. 94 Draft amendment to UN R94 as prepared by the WP.29 expert group on frontal impact to introduce provisions for offset deformable and full width rigid barrier tests. This draft is presented only for informational purposes pending submission of a final version for consideration at the May 2014 GRSP session.
GRSP-54-40 | Status report of the Informal Working Group on Frontal Impact Report of the expert group developing revised test procedures under UN Regulation No. 94, including work on offset deformable and full-width rigid barrier testing and procedures for lower-leg and foot protection.
15. Regulation No. 95 (Lateral collision)
15. (a) Proposal for a new Regulation on Pole Side Impact
GRSP-54-14 | Draft new Regulation No. [13X] and 01 series of amendments concerning pole side impact performance Draft version of the proposed UN Regulation that would transpose Global Technical Regulation No. 14 on pole side-impact protection into the type-approval system of the 1958 Agreement. This draft is presented for informational purposes only pending submission of a final document for consideration by the GRSP.
GRSP/2014/9 | Draft new regulation concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to pole side impact performance Draft text transposing GTR No. 14 on pole side impact protection into a UN Regulation under the 1958 Agreement. A proposal for the 01 series of amendments (document GRSP/2014/12) has also been prepared to enable the Contracting Parties applying this Regulation to require a vehicle-to-pole impact speed of 32 ±1 km/h regardless of the "vehicle width".
15. (b) Proposal for amendments
16. Regulation No. 100 (Battery electric vehicle safety)
GRSP-54-13 | Proposal for requirements regarding vehicles of category L with electric power train Text prepared for information only by the Chairman of the informal group on Rechargeable Energy Storage Systems (REESS) to present requirements for electric motorcycles within a consolidated version of UN Regulation No. 100 without prejudicing whether the requirements will be established as an amendment of an existing regulation or as new regulation.
GRSP-54-26 | Japan position on electric motorcycle and mini-vehicle regulation proposals (REESS) Japanese statement proposing to remove vehicle categories L5-L7 (three-wheelers and quadricycles) from the proposals to regulate "rechargeable energy storage systems" (REESS) in mopeds, motorcycles, and similar vehicles as a condition for its acceptance either of a new regulation or as an amendment to UN R100 on electric-powered vehicles.
GRSP-54-13 | Proposal for requirements regarding vehicles of category L with electric power train Text prepared for information only by the Chairman of the informal group on Rechargeable Energy Storage Systems (REESS) to present requirements for electric motorcycles within a consolidated version of UN Regulation No. 100 without prejudicing whether the requirements will be established as an amendment of an existing regulation or as new regulation.
17. Buses and coaches
18. Regulation No. 127 (Pedestrian safety)
18. (a) Proposal for Supplement 1 to Regulation No. 127
GRSP/2011/18 | Proposal for Supplement 1 to the draft Regulation on Pedestrian Safety
GRSP/2011/19 | Proposal for Supplement 1 to the draft Regulation on Pedestrian Safety
GRSP-54-09 | Draft Supplement 1 to Regulation No. 127 in its original version Proposal for amendments to the bumper test area and headform test procedure.
GRSP-54-38 | Draft Supplement 1 to Regulation No. 127 in its original version Proposal to clarify a measurement procedure between test points in the supplement.
GRSP-54-09/Rev.1 | Draft Supplement 1 to Regulation No. 127 in its original version With informal document GRSP-54-07, the European Commission presented modifications to GTR No. 9 considering the discussion on the headform test procedures in the GTR and also including amendments proposed by other parties. The details as well as the proposed wording were discussed in the GRSP sessions between the 48th session in December 2010 and the 53rd session in May 2013. This document presents the subsequent changes to UN Regulation 127.
GRSP-54-39 | Proposal for amendments to the draft 01 series of amendments to Regulation No. 127 Proposal to amend the transitional provisions presented in document GRSP/2013/26 (01 series of amendments to Regulation No. 127).
18. (b) Proposal for the 01 series of amendments to Regulation No. 127
GRSP/2011/14 | Proposal for the 01 series amendments to draft Regulation on pedestrian safety
GRSP/2011/20 | Proposal for the 01 series of amendments to the draft Regulation on Pedestrian Safety
GRSP/2013/26 | Proposal of 01 series of amendments to Regulation No. 127 Proposal by the experts from the informal working group on Global Technical Regulation No. 9-Phase 2 to amend the UN Regulation on pedestrian protection of motor vehicles.
GRSP-54-39 | Proposal for amendments to the draft 01 series of amendments to Regulation No. 127 Proposal to amend the transitional provisions presented in document GRSP/2013/26 (01 series of amendments to Regulation No. 127).
GRSP-54-15/Rev.1 | Proposal for the 01 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 127 (revised) Consolidated version of the UN Regulation No. 127 including Corr. 1 to the original version, draft Supplement 1 to the original version and the draft 01 series of amendments to the UN Regulation.
GRSP/54/Add.1 | Addendum 1 to the report of the GRSP on its 54th session Draft 01 series of amendments to Regulation No. 127 presented in a consolidated text of the regulation as adopted by GRSP and which aligns the test requirements of UN Regulation No. 127 with UN GTR No. 9 Phase 2 (Flex-PLI), incorporating Supplement 1 to the original version of the UN Regulation (determination of the headform test points).
GRSP-54-39 | Proposal for amendments to the draft 01 series of amendments to Regulation No. 127 Proposal to amend the transitional provisions presented in document GRSP/2013/26 (01 series of amendments to Regulation No. 127).
19. Regulation No. 129 (Enhanced Child Restraint Systems)
GRSP/2013/23 | Draft 01 series of amendments (Phase 2) to Regulation No. 129 Text to introduce all the modifications needed in UN Regulation No. 129 (enhanced child restraint systems (ECRS)) suggested by the experts of the informal working group on child restraint systems (IWG CRS) to extend the scope of this regulation to non-integral Child Restraint Systems ("Universal Booster" or "Specific to vehicle Booster") (Phase 2 of the UN Regulation).
GRSP/2013/21 | Proposal for Supplement 3 to Regulation No. 129 In response to a GRSP request (ECE/TRANS/WP29/GRSP/53, para. 45) concerning the configuration of Child Restraint Systems (CRS) combining a base attached to the vehicle by ISOFIX anchorages with a shell installed on the base. This shell could also be used without the base and secured by an adult safety belt. This proposal aims at allowing the type approval of this configuration according to UN Regulation No. 129 in its first phase.
GRSP-54-24 | Corrections to the draft 01 series of amendments (Phase 2) to Regulation No. 129 Corrections and clarifications to the proposed amendment to the enhanced child restraint systems regulation.
GRSP-54-35 | Status report on the further development of UN Regulation No. 129 (Enhanced CRS)
WP.29/2014/33 | Proposal for Supplement 3 to Regulation No. 129 This supplement concerns child restraint systems comprised of a base fixture to which a portable shell can be attached. The base fixture is attached to the vehicle by the ISOFIX anchorages in the seating position and the shell attached to the base. However, since the shells may also be designed for use without the base fixture in a configuration where the shell is secured by the adult safety belt of the seating position, this supplement would enable type approvals under UN R129 for this configuration.
GRSP-54-36 | Draft 01 series of amendments (Phase 2) to UN Regulation No. 129 Working draft of the proposed amendments to introduce provisions for non-integral CRS ("Universal Booster" or "Specific to vehicle Booster"), incorporating all the changes agreed during the 54th (December 2013) GRSP session.
GRSP-54-36 | Draft 01 series of amendments (Phase 2) to UN Regulation No. 129 Working draft of the proposed amendments to introduce provisions for non-integral CRS ("Universal Booster" or "Specific to vehicle Booster"), incorporating all the changes agreed during the 54th (December 2013) GRSP session.
GRSP/2013/21 | Proposal for Supplement 3 to Regulation No. 129 In response to a GRSP request (ECE/TRANS/WP29/GRSP/53, para. 45) concerning the configuration of Child Restraint Systems (CRS) combining a base attached to the vehicle by ISOFIX anchorages with a shell installed on the base. This shell could also be used without the base and secured by an adult safety belt. This proposal aims at allowing the type approval of this configuration according to UN Regulation No. 129 in its first phase.
20. Proposal for new Regulation on hydrogen and fuel cell vehicles
GRSP/2013/22 | Draft UN Regulation on hydrogen and fuel cell vehicles Draft text that would adapt the GTR on hydrogen vehicle safety to the type-approval system via a new UN Regulation.
GRSP-54-01 | Transposition of GTR No.13 “Hydrogen and fuel cell vehicles” into a UN Regulation: Explanatory material Background presentation explaining issues encountered in transposing the GTR on HFCV into a UN (type-approval) Regulation.
GRSP-54-02 | Draft Regulation on hydrogen and fuel cell vehicles Proposal for the text of the UN Regulation transposing the Global Technical Regulation on hydrogen and fuel-cell vehicles into the 1958 Agreement. This version highlights changes from the GTR text.
GRSP-54-12 | Proposal for amendments to the draft UN Regulation on hydrogen fuel cell vehicles Proposal for amendments to document GRSP/2013/22.
GRSP-54-21 | Proposed revisions to the draft UN Regulation on hydrogen fuel-cell vehicle safety Japan proposes changes to the draft text (document GRSP/2013/22) intended to transpose GTR No. 13 on hydrogen fuel-cell vehicle safety into the UN Regulation type approval system.
GRSP-54-22 | Japan comments and proposals to align the draft UN Regulation on HFCV with GTR No. 13 Japan argues to limit the scope (as in the GTR) to passenger vehicles with a GVM of 4,536 kg or less; defer liquefied hydrogen storage system (LHSS) provisions; specify frontal impact and rear impact tests (or allow national tests until phase 2 of GTR 13 is complete),and add batch and production test requirements. Japan also notes editorial corrections.
GRSP-54-37 | Scope of the Draft UN Regulation on Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Vehicles Presentation raising concerns over the transposition of GTR No. 13 on hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles into a corresponding UN Regulation.
21. Election of officers
22. Other business
22. (a) Exchange of information on national and international requirements on passive safety
22. (b) 1997 Agreement (Inspections)–Development of Rule No. 2
22. (c) Quiet Road Transport Vehicles (QRTV)
22. (d) Definition and acronyms in the Regulations under GRSP's responsibilities
GRSP-51-03 | Abbreviations and Acronyms used in the UN Regulations of GRSP During the 50th session of GRSP, the chairperson had requested participants to prepare a list with abbreviations used in the UN regulations under GRSP. EC had volunteered to carry out this task and it was agreed that the list would be submitted to GRSP as an informal document.
22. (e) Development of the International Whole Vehicle Type Approval (IWVTA) system
WP.29/2014/26 | Proposal for Revision 3 of the 1958 Agreement Draft text for a revised and updated 1958 Agreement pursuant to the project to establish an international whole vehicle type approval system.
WP.29-161-17 | Progress Towards an International Whole Vehicle Type Approval Scheme Progress report from the expert group working on the IWVTA regulation providing on overview of the proposed whole vehicle regulation, issues for attention of the World Forum, and consideration of future development.
22. (f) Highlights of the June and November 2013 sessions of WP.29
22. (g) Proposal for amendment to Global Technical Regulation No. 13
GRSP-54-10 | Proposal for amendment to Global Technical Regulation No.13 Proposed amendments to clarify the GTR text in alignment with the proposed text for its UN Regulation homologue.
GRSP-54-11 | Proposal for amendment to global technical regulation No. 13 EC proposals to revise GTR No. 13 based upon items identified during the process of transposing the GTR into the form of a UN Regulation force use in type-approval systems.
22. (h) Proposal for Supplement 1 to the 04 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 25
GRSP-54-17 | Proposal for Supplement 1 to the 04 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 25 Proposal to limit the overlap of this head restraint regulation with UN R17 which also addresses head restraints within the context of seat integrity. The amendment would exempt any vehicle head restraints approved under UN R17 from the requirements of UN R25. Presently, only M1 passenger cars qualify for this derogation.
GRSP-54-20 | Japan proposal for Supplement 3 to the 08 series of amendments to Regulation No. 17 In document GRSP-54-04, CLEPA proposed changes to improve the reproducibility of the luggage impact test described in annex 9 of UN R17. Japan proposes to specify only the minimum moment of inertia in the test (where CLEPA proposed a minimum-maximum range.
23. Tributes