Session 54 | Geneva | 17-20 Dec 2013
2. Global Technical Regulation No. 7 (Head restraints)
GRSP/2013/17 | Proposal for Amendment 1 to GTR No. 7 Proposal to specify a head restraint height between 720 mm and 830 mm pursuant to the work on phase 2 of GTR No. 7 which includes a new method for measuring the effective height of head restraints.
GRSP-54-18 | GTR No. 7: OICA position on head restraint height The expert group on the 2nd phase development of GTR No. 7 has proposed a new method for measuring head-restraint height and, using this method, proposed to specify heights between 720-830 mm. OICA accepts the new measurement method, but argues for keeping the current 800 mm specification on the grounds that 800 mm under the new method would be 830 mm under the old.
GRSP-54-18/Rev.1 | GTR No. 7: OICA position on head restraint height (revised) The expert group on the 2nd phase development of GTR No. 7 has proposed a new method for measuring head-restraint height and, using this method, proposed to specify heights between 720-830 mm. OICA accepts the new measurement method, but argues for keeping the current 800 mm specification on the grounds that 800 mm under the new method would be 830 mm under the old.
GRSP-54-23 | US comments on the proposal for Amendment 1 to GTR No. 7 The United States will not support the proposed amendment in its current form. The amendment would increase headrest heights for front outboard seating positions from 800 mm to at least 830 mm while allowing a decrease in minimum heights to 720 mm from 750mm. In addition, the amendment would allow decreased rear heights. The US believes the amendment lacks adequate evidence-based justifications for the proposed changes.
GRSP-54-28 | Status report on GTR No. 7 and the BioRID Technical Evaluation Group
GRSP-54-30 | Draft 5th progress report of the informal group on Phase 2 of GTR No. 7
GRSP/2013/24 | Draft amendment 1 (Phase 2) to GTR No. 7 Working draft of the phase 2 revisions to the global technical regulation on head restraints provided to the GRSP at its December 2013 session for informational purposes only.
GRSP-54-05 | MR1: Specifications for the 50th percentile male BioRID-II ATD Specifications for the Construction, Preparation and Certification of the 50th percentile male Biofidelic Rear Impact Dummy, (BioRID-II) anthropometric test device for inclusion in the Mutual Resolution No. 1 on test devices used in UN Regulations and GTR.
10. Regulation No. 17 (Strength of seats)
GRSP/2009/15 | Alignment of Regulation No. 17 with GTR No. 7 (Head restraints) Proposal aimed at transposing Global Technical Regulation No. 7 (head restraints) into Regulation No. 17 and introducing the use of Biofidelic Rear Impact test Dummy (BioRID II) into the dynamic performance requirements.
GRSP-54-04 | Proposal for Supplement 3 to the 08 series of amendments to Regulation No. 17 Proposal to improve the reproducibility of the luggage impact test described in annex 9 of UN Regulation No. 17.
GRSP-54-20 | Japan proposal for Supplement 3 to the 08 series of amendments to Regulation No. 17 In document GRSP-54-04, CLEPA proposed changes to improve the reproducibility of the luggage impact test described in annex 9 of UN R17. Japan proposes to specify only the minimum moment of inertia in the test (where CLEPA proposed a minimum-maximum range.
22. (h) Proposal for Supplement 1 to the 04 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 25
GRSP-54-17 | Proposal for Supplement 1 to the 04 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 25 Proposal to limit the overlap of this head restraint regulation with UN R17 which also addresses head restraints within the context of seat integrity. The amendment would exempt any vehicle head restraints approved under UN R17 from the requirements of UN R25. Presently, only M1 passenger cars qualify for this derogation.
GRSP-54-04
Proposal for Supplement 3 to the 08 series of amendments to Regulation No. 17 (CLEPA)
10 Oct 2013 Working Party Informal Documents Strength of Seats, Anchorages, and Head Restraints Strength of Seats Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Vehicles with regard to the Seats, their Anchorages and any Head Restraints Proposal to improve the reproducibility of the luggage impact test described in annex 9 of UN Regulation No. 17. GRSP-54-0004
GRSP-54-17
Proposal for Supplement 1 to the 04 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 25 (OICA)
12 Dec 2013 Working Party Informal Documents Head Restraints Head Restraints Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Head Restraints (Headrests), Whether or Not Incorporated in Vehicle Seats Strength of Seats, Anchorages, and Head Restraints Strength of Seats Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Vehicles with regard to the Seats, their Anchorages and any Head Restraints Seat Strength and Seat Anchorages for Large Passenger Vehicles Coach Seat Strength Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Seats of Large Passenger Vehicles and of these Vehicles with regard to the Strength of the Seats and their Anchorages Proposal to limit the overlap of this head restraint regulation with UN R17 which also addresses head restraints within the context of seat integrity. The amendment would exempt any vehicle head restraints approved under UN R17 from the requirements of UN R25. Presently, only M1 passenger cars qualify for this derogation. GRSP-54-0017
GRSP-54-20
Japan proposal for Supplement 3 to the 08 series of amendments to Regulation No. 17 (Japan)
13 Dec 2013 Working Party Informal Documents Strength of Seats, Anchorages, and Head Restraints Strength of Seats Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Vehicles with regard to the Seats, their Anchorages and any Head Restraints In document GRSP-54-04, CLEPA proposed changes to improve the reproducibility of the luggage impact test described in annex 9 of UN R17. Japan proposes to specify only the minimum moment of inertia in the test (where CLEPA proposed a minimum-maximum range. GRSP-54-0020