19. The expert from EC recalled the discussion at the previous session of GRPE on GRPE-60-03 and presented ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2011/2 proposing a number of editorial corrections to gtr No. 11 on the engine emissions of tractors and Non-Road Mobile Machinery (NRMM). GRPE adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2011/2, not amended, and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.3, for consideration at their June 2011 sessions, as Corrigendum 1 to gtr No. 11

22. The expert from Italy presented ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2011/3 proposing to introduce into Regulation No. 120 the new reference fuel required by Directive 2004/26/EC for the three stages IIIA, IIIB and IV. GRPE adopted the document, not amended, and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1, for consideration at their sessions in June 2011, as Supplement 1 to Regulation No. 120.

23. The expert from Italy introduced GRPE-61-09 aimed at aligning the provisions of Regulation No. 120 with those of gtr No. 11 and Regulation No. 96. GRPE noted a number of comments. GRPE agreed to resume consideration of this subject at its next session in June 2011 on the basis of an official document. For this purpose, the expert from Italy volunteered to submit, in due time, an updated proposal taking into account the comments received.

14. The Secretary of the informal group on Worldwide harmonized Motorcycle emission Test Cycle (WMTC) reported on the good work progress made by the group (GRPE-61-23). He introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2011/7 proposing a number of corrections to gtr No. 2 on WMTC. He also presented ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2011/4 proposing to insert performance requirements into gtr No. 2 and to clarify the current text. He explained that the principle limit values were based on the Japanese legislation, while the three alternative limit values were based on the Euro 3 emission level of the European Union (EU), the current limit values of India and of the United States of America. He added that the proposal should be submitted as an amendment to gtr No. 2 together with the technical report ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2009/133.

15. GRPE adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2011/4, not amended, and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.3, for consideration at their June 2011 sessions, as Amendment 2 to global technical regulation No. 2. GRPE agreed to also submit to WP.29 and AC.3 the technical report ECE/TRANS/WP.29 /2009/133.

16. GRPE adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2011/7, not amended, and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.3, for consideration at their June 2011 sessions, as Corrigendum 2 to gtr No. 2.

17. The expert from Japan informed GRPE about the ongoing transposition of gtr No. 2 into the national legislation of his country (GRPE-61-06).

18. The GRPE Chair congratulated the informal group for achieving the inclusion of the limit values into gtr No. 2. He recalled the need to update the GRPE website with the new WMTC gear selection sheets. He added that, as soon as Euro 4 and Euro 5 limits were adopted at the European Union level, these limit values would have to be inserted into the gtr on the basis of a further amendment. GRPE agreed to resume consideration of this subject at its next session.

33. The expert from OICA recalled the purpose of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2009/8 proposing to clarify and update Regulation No. 83 on the specifications for the Flame Ionisation Detector (FID) hydrocarbon analyser. The experts from the Netherlands and Poland reconfirmed their concerns. The Chair recommended removing ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2009/8 from the agenda of GRPE. He invited the expert from OICA to prepare jointly with the experts from EC, the Netherlands and Poland a revised proposal and to submit it to the informal group on WLTP for a detailed consideration.

34. The expert from the Netherlands proposed inserting into Regulation No. 83, new specifications for the proportional speed fan which might be used during the testing of vehicles on the chassis dynamometer. For this purpose, he introduced GRPE-61-19 clarifying ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2011/6 and complementing it with transitional provisions. He withdrew ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2011/5. GRPE adopted the proposal ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2011/6, as reproduced in Annex IV to this report. The secretariat was requested to submit the adopted proposal to WP.29 and AC.1, for consideration at their June 2011 sessions, as Supplement 2 to the 06 series of amendments to Regulation No. 83.

33. The expert from OICA recalled the purpose of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2009/8 proposing to clarify and update Regulation No. 83 on the specifications for the Flame Ionisation Detector (FID) hydrocarbon analyser. The experts from the Netherlands and Poland reconfirmed their concerns. The Chair recommended removing ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2009/8 from the agenda of GRPE. He invited the expert from OICA to prepare jointly with the experts from EC, the Netherlands and Poland a revised proposal and to submit it to the informal group on WLTP for a detailed consideration.

34. The expert from the Netherlands proposed inserting into Regulation No. 83, new specifications for the proportional speed fan which might be used during the testing of vehicles on the chassis dynamometer. For this purpose, he introduced GRPE-61-19 clarifying ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2011/6 and complementing it with transitional provisions. He withdrew ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2011/5. GRPE adopted the proposal ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2011/6, as reproduced in Annex IV to this report. The secretariat was requested to submit the adopted proposal to WP.29 and AC.1, for consideration at their June 2011 sessions, as Supplement 2 to the 06 series of amendments to Regulation No. 83.

14. The Secretary of the informal group on Worldwide harmonized Motorcycle emission Test Cycle (WMTC) reported on the good work progress made by the group (GRPE-61-23). He introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2011/7 proposing a number of corrections to gtr No. 2 on WMTC. He also presented ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2011/4 proposing to insert performance requirements into gtr No. 2 and to clarify the current text. He explained that the principle limit values were based on the Japanese legislation, while the three alternative limit values were based on the Euro 3 emission level of the European Union (EU), the current limit values of India and of the United States of America. He added that the proposal should be submitted as an amendment to gtr No. 2 together with the technical report ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2009/133.

15. GRPE adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2011/4, not amended, and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.3, for consideration at their June 2011 sessions, as Amendment 2 to global technical regulation No. 2. GRPE agreed to also submit to WP.29 and AC.3 the technical report ECE/TRANS/WP.29 /2009/133.

16. GRPE adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2011/7, not amended, and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.3, for consideration at their June 2011 sessions, as Corrigendum 2 to gtr No. 2.

17. The expert from Japan informed GRPE about the ongoing transposition of gtr No. 2 into the national legislation of his country (GRPE-61-06).

18. The GRPE Chair congratulated the informal group for achieving the inclusion of the limit values into gtr No. 2. He recalled the need to update the GRPE website with the new WMTC gear selection sheets. He added that, as soon as Euro 4 and Euro 5 limits were adopted at the European Union level, these limit values would have to be inserted into the gtr on the basis of a further amendment. GRPE agreed to resume consideration of this subject at its next session.