| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document title | Proposal to develop a new UN Regulation on e-call systems | ||||||||||
| Date | 3 Oct 2013 | Working draft of the proposed new regulation on in-vehicle automated emergency call systems. | |||||||||
| Source(s) | OICA | ||||||||||
| Status | Superseded | ||||||||||
| Rulemaking area(s) | |||||||||||
| Meeting(s) | |||||||||||
| Related documents | |||||||||||
| AECS-02-02 | Working draft of the UN Regulation on emergency call devices (Superseded) | ||||||||||
| Downloads: | .doc format | ||||||||||
| Excerpts from session reports related to this document | |||||||||||
| AECS | Session 1 | 8 Oct 2013 |
4.1 Updated document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2013/67/Rev.1 Document AECS-01-03 was presented by RUS. OICA pointed out that the comments from Renault integrated in document AECS-01-03 should be disregarded, because they would be integrated in a further OICA document. OICA was keen that RUS provides the justifications for the structure of their proposal. RUS explained the 2-part structure as the devices and the installation of the devices. The annexes were too big to be included directly in the 1st draft. OICA presented document AECS-01-04 focusing on the main points:
RUS agreed with the 3-part draft text. OICA committed to prepare a revised text for the next meeting with the support from RUS. Conclusion:
|
||||||||||