GAR | CRS-40-02

Regulation:	UN Regulation No. 131 \| Advanced Emergency Braking Systems
Document:	Revision 1 \| Amendment 3
Corresponds to:	01 series of amendments \| Supplement 3 (Entered into force on 24 Sep 2023)
Based on:	Document WP.29/2023/11 Proposal to increase the potential speed reduction during the collision warning phase and clarify the interpretation of “engine start/run cycle”.

Regulation:	UN Regulation No. 131 \| Advanced Emergency Braking Systems
Document:	Revision 2 \| Amendment 1
Corresponds to:	02 series of amendments \| Supplement 1 (Entered into force on 24 Sep 2023)
Based on:	Document WP.29/2023/12 Proposal to align provisions with corresponding provisions of UN R152 and to clarify the interpretation of the provisions on system robustness when applied to heavy duty vehicles.

Regulation:	UN Regulation No. 137 \| Restraint System in Frontal Impact
Document:	Revision 2
Corresponds to:	01 series of amendments \| Supplement 1 (Entered into force on 29 Dec 2018)
Corresponds to:	01 series of amendments \| Supplement 2 (Entered into force on 28 May 2019)
Corresponds to:	01 series of amendments \| Supplement 3 (Entered into force on 3 Jan 2021)
Corresponds to:	02 series of amendments (Entered into force on 9 Jun 2021)

Regulation:	UN Regulation No. 161 \| Devices for Protection against Unauthorized Use
Document:	Revision 0 \| Amendment 3
Corresponds to:	00 series of amendments \| Supplement 3 (Entered into force on 5 Jun 2023)
Based on:	Document WP.29/2022/146 Proposal from GRSG to clarify the scope of the UN Regulation and to complement the text with the missing Supplement 7 to the original version of UN R116.

Regulation:	UN Regulation No. 13 \| Heavy-Duty Vehicle Braking
Document:	Revision 9 \| Amendment 2
Corresponds to:	12 series of amendments \| Supplement 2 (Entered into force on 5 Jun 2023)
Based on:	Document WP.29/2022/138

Regulation:	UN Regulation No. 13 \| Heavy-Duty Vehicle Braking
Document:	Revision 8 \| Amendment 11
Corresponds to:	11 series of amendments \| Supplement 20 (Entered into force on 5 Jun 2023)
Based on:	Document WP.29/2022/137 Proposal to clarify provisions regarding the actuation of the parking brake warning device to cover the case of electric control transmission systems where there may be a transition between parked (applied) and un-parked (released) braking states.

Child Restraint Systems: ISO SC12/WG1 Task Force 4 Status

Document CRS-40-02

18 September 2013

40th CRS session (18 Sep 2013)

Update on the ISO task force established to improve compatibility between child seat systems and vehicles in three ways:

Belt compatibility (revision of belt length and load bearing point)
Isofix Compatibility
- - Support Leg
- - Top Tether
Isofix booster compatibility

Submitted by Dorel

40th CRS session (18 Sep 2013)

4.3. | Feedback from ISO SC12 WG1 TF4

Information was shared on ISO Task Force 4 activity which was dedicated on compatibility between CRS and vehicles (belt compatibility, Isofix compatibility for support leg & top tether.
Isofix & belt anchors position). The group is focussing now on booster compatibility only.
Initial CAD reconstructions were conducted. They were useful to define improvements areas on the current fixture. A physical fixture confirms these modifications needs during a Workshop held last August in Renault Lardy technical centre. A new version of the CRF will be proposed soon.
TF4 is also investigating lateral protection responsibility. The position of the 5th percentile female dummy was chosen as a reference. It was observed that P10 head position in current booster is always higher than the HIII 5th percentile female dummy. The Q6 head is located lower to the 5th percentile head but not so much (4 to 10 cm). Q6 head’s position is highly dependant from the booster used.
5th percentile female head‘s position was determined when seated on the i-Size bench. TF4 propose to test lateral protection when child’s head is below an horizontal plane located [750 mm] above the Cr point. Above [750 mm] the car needs to protect the head.
This proposal was debated widely. The possibility or the requirement to propose side impact protection above [750 mm] or outside the fixture was discussed. Will this imply a compatibility list? What about the responsibility in case of bad side curtain deployment?
(The diagram presented in document CRS-40-04 from the chairman summarizes the situation.)
The IG is interested by ISO/TF4 proposals but suggests integrating a belt routing in the fixture.

Reference Number:	TA-23-07
Meeting Session(s):	23rd TA session (25 Apr)
Document date:	29 May 24

Reference Number:	R134-24-04/Rev.1
Submitted by:	OICA
Meeting Session(s):	24th R134 session (7 May)
Document date:	09 May 24
Regarding:	UN R134 Hydrogen Fuel Cell Safety

Reference Number:	R134-24-05
Meeting Session(s):	24th R134 session (7 May)
Document date:	09 May 24
Regarding:	UN R134 Hydrogen Fuel Cell Safety \| GTR No. 13 Hydrogen/Fuel Cell Vehicles

Reference Number:	EVE-71-02
Meeting Session(s):	71st EVE session (27-28 May)
Document date:	08 May 24
Regarding:	HD EV Battery Durability

How Do You Want Call Up the List of Documents?

AC.3 Select Year

GRB Select Year

GRBP Select Year

GRE Select Year

GRPE Select Year

GRRF Select Year

GRSG Select Year

GRSP Select Year

GRVA Select Year

WP.29 Select Year

Documents concerning UN R129 Enhanced Child Restraints

AC.3

Select Year

GRB

Select Year

GRBP

Select Year

GRE

Select Year

GRPE

Select Year

GRRF

Select Year

GRSG

Select Year

GRSP

Select Year

GRVA

Select Year

WP.29

Select Year