18. The representative of UK presented, also on behalf of Germany, a proposal to create a new IWG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) (WP.29-195-20). He proposed four tasks that the new IWG on AI should address: perform a literature review, develop a guidance document on best practices, report back to WP.29 and after that, consider the need for further work. The representative of the EU emphasized that the result of the work of the IWG should not prejudge the needs of contracting parties to take additional steps, such as drafting of regulatory requirements under the umbrella of WP29.
19. The representatives of Canada, China, European Union, France, Netherlands (Kingdom of the), Sweden and the US supported the proposal. The representatives of IEEE and SAE International volunteered to provide secretariat services to the IWG.
20. WP.29 decided to establish a new IWG on AI under WP.29 and requested the interested representatives to prepare its draft ToR for consideration at the June 2025 session of WP.29. WP.29 also concurred with the view of the representative of the US that the leadership of the group should reflect the global representation of WP.29.
(b) Informal working group on Artificial Intelligence
16. The representative of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Co-Chair of the IWG on AI, reported on the group’s activities since November 2025. He summarized the four sessions held, including one in Geneva during the 197th WP.29 week and another in Seoul (Republic of Korea). He listed the progress achieved and proposed revised terms of reference. The representative of the European Commission questioned whether the revised terms of reference would still effectively serve the needs of a number of contracting parties and whether more time was simply needed rather than having to process the revision of the terms of reference. The representatives of Canada, France, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Norther Ireland, Sweden, and United States of America noted that a revision was justified given the ambitious initial one-year workplan, and they supported the compromise proposed by the IWG. The representative of Sweden also supported the new Terms of Reference, at the same time she pointed out that in the longer perspective, there is a need to clarify how type approval authorities and technical service should assess the use of AI. WP.29 adopted the revised terms of reference (see annex IV, based on WP.29-198-10) and agreed to consider a mandate extension for the group in June 2026.