1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Document Title UN R90: Proposal for a new Supplement to the 01 and 02 Series of Amendments
Reference Number GRVA/2021/15
Date
20 Nov 2020
Summary Proposal to replace the specification of the type and size of brake caliper and brake disc for brake lining CoP assessment with specifications for a pad area and thickness of the original approval. The original specification corresponds to obsolete caliper and rotor configurations no longer in widespread use.
Source(s) CLEPA
Rulemaking Area(s) UN R90 Replacement Brake Components
Proposal Status Superseded
Meeting(s)
Related Documents
GRVA-07-52 UN R90: Proposal for supplements to the 01 and 02 series of amendments (superseded)
GRVA-09-41 UN R90: Proposal to amend document GRVA/2021/15 (superseded)
GRVA-10-28 UN R90: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2021/15 (superseded)
WP.29/2021/139 UN R90: Proposal for Supplement 7 to the 02 series of amendments (adopted)
Downloads
UNECE server .pdf format .docx format
Excerpts from session reports related to this document
GRVA | Session 9 | 1-5 Feb 2021

107. The expert from CLEPA introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2021/15 as amended by GRVA-09-41. The expert from Germany explained that he could only support parts of the proposal and stressed the need for the type approval authority to be able to check the setup used for the Conformity of Production (CoP) tests. The expert from CLEPA explained that he could not agree with the position expressed by the expert from Germany.

108. The expert from Germany stated his readiness to further discuss this matter. The expert from France explained that he could support the text marked in red in the document. The expert from FEMFM supported this discussion. GRVA agreed to resume consideration of this item at its next session.

107. The expert from CLEPA introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2021/15 as amended by GRVA-09-41. The expert from Germany explained that he could only support parts of the proposal and stressed the need for the type approval authority to be able to check the setup used for the Conformity of Production (CoP) tests. The expert from CLEPA explained that he could not agree with the position expressed by the expert from Germany.

108. The expert from Germany stated his readiness to further discuss this matter. The expert from France explained that he could support the text marked in red in the document. The expert from FEMFM supported this discussion. GRVA agreed to resume consideration of this item at its next session.