| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document Title | Proposal for additional requirements to the ALKS Regulation (GRVA-06-02) | ||||||||
| Reference Number | GRVA-06-11 | ||||||||
| Date |
2 Mar 2020
|
||||||||
| Summary | This document outlines the UK’s latest proposals to permit a lane change function during a minimum risk manoeuvre or emergency manoeuvre as part of the forthcoming ALKS Regulation. | ||||||||
| Source(s) | UK | ||||||||
| Rulemaking Area(s) | UN R157 Automated Lane-Keeping Systems | ||||||||
| Proposal Status | Informal GR review | ||||||||
| Meeting(s) | |||||||||
| Related Documents | |||||||||
| GRVA-06-02 | ALKS: Updated proposal for a new UN Regulation on Automated Lane Keeping Function (superseded) | ||||||||
| Downloads | |||||||||
| UNECE server | .pdf format | .docx format | |||||||
| Excerpts from session reports related to this document | |||||||||
| GRVA | Session 6 | 3-4 Mar 2020 |
7. GRVA reviewed in detail GRVA-06-02 prepared by the ACSF group for consideration at this session. 8. GRVA reviewed the scope of the proposed Regulation, discussed a number of items such as the alignment of definitions with existing standards, whether or not the Software Indentification Number (RxSWIN) mechanism in the draft UN Regulation on Software Updates and Software Update Management Systems should be implemented on a mandatory basis. 12. The expert from the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland recalled their position on the need to allow ALKS to perform a lane change if necessary, during an emergency manoeuvre. GRVA did not have the time to review in detail his proposal (GRVA-06-11) and agreed to resume this discussion at the GRVA session in September 2020. 24. The Chair regretted that GRVA did not have enough time for reviewing the proposal submitted by the expert from AVERE and also for the proposal submitted by the expert from the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. GRVA agreed to consider these two items at its September 2020 session. 24. The Chair regretted that GRVA did not have enough time for reviewing the proposal submitted by the expert from AVERE and also for the proposal submitted by the expert from the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. GRVA agreed to consider these two items at its September 2020 session. |
||||||||