| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document Title | Amendment proposal for documents GRRF/2015/40 and /41 (GTR 3 and UN R78 on motorcycle braking) | ||||||||
| Reference Number | GRRF-80-19 | ||||||||
| Date |
15 Sep 2015
|
||||||||
| Summary | Discussion document raising concerns and offering proposals concerning motorcycle ABS testing. | ||||||||
| Source(s) | Canada | ||||||||
| Rulemaking Area(s) | GTR No. 3 Motorcycle Brakes and UN R78 Motorcycle Braking | ||||||||
| Proposal Status | Superseded | ||||||||
| Meeting(s) | |||||||||
| Downloads | |||||||||
| UNECE server | .pdf format | .docx format | |||||||
| Excerpts from session reports related to this document | |||||||||
| GRRF | Session 80 | 15-18 Sep 2015 |
24. The expert from EC introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2015/40 and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2015/41, proposing to clarify the possibility to install means to temporarily reduce or disable the ABS function of motorcycles in certain conditions. The expert from Canada submitted an alternative wording (GRRF-80-19) and recalled that an authorization from the Executive Committee AC.3 for developing an amendment to GTR No. 3 would be required. The proposal received some general comments related to road safety. The expert from IMMA briefly introduced GRRF-80-13 commenting the proposals to which the expert from EC responded (GRRF-80-24 and GRRF-80-25). A majority of experts expressed a specific concern related to condition (f). The expert from EC volunteered to prepare two revised proposals for the [February 2016] session of GRRF. |
||||||||