Proposal to clarify that transparency requirements under UN R43 apply in both directions (exterior to interior and interior to exterior), addressing the growing use of privacy foils on windscreens and front side windows post-registration, which raises safety concerns regarding driver eye-contact, law enforcement visibility, and driving behaviour enforcement, consistent with the position expressed by GRSG at its 130th session.

Proposal to amend para. 8.2.1.1. to replace “Optional distortion” with “Optical distortion” in the table of tests for windscreens and glass panes. The amendment corrects the title of the optical distortion test listed in the table.

Proposal to amend para. 2.5.2. to change the lower vertical datum point from 5 above the horizontal to 4 above the horizontal, and amend Figure 3 to reflect this adjustment. The modification harmonizes the location of the lower datum point with the angle of obstruction requirement and resolves an inconsistency in UN Regulation No. 43.

Proposal to add footnote 1 to para. 6.2. defining transparency as requisite for the driver’s forward field of vision, for the driver to see and to be seen, and insert new para. 6.3. stating that safety glazing located in a position requisite for driving visibility may not be treated such that it limits or restricts the visibility of the driver from outside, for example by applying a mirror or chameleon effect, with minimum light transmittance provisions as described in Annex 24 applying from both directions.

Proposal to add footnote 1 to para. 6.2. to clarify that safety glazing materials must be sufficiently transparent as a requisite for the driver’s forward field of vision, for the driver to see and to be seen. The amendment aims to clarify possible safety concerns to ensure that the driver can be seen from outside and does not introduce new provisions but clarifies the intent of existing provisions.

Letter of support from the International Federation of Pedestrians and the European Cyclists Federation for the proposal for Supplement 14 to the 01 series of amendments to UN R43. The submission supports efforts to clarify regulations and ensure that windows within the driver’s forward field of vision meet minimum light-transmission requirements when viewed from both inside and outside the vehicle, and opposes treatments or tints that prevent people outside the vehicle from seeing the driver.

Report on a workshop organized by the Kingdom of the Netherlands on 25 August 2026 in Brussels to address transparency provisions in UN R43. The workshop discussed current transparency requirements, alternative test procedures for reflection, definitions such as chameleon effect, and amendments to working document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2026/20. Participants agreed transparency provisions are not direction-dependent, confirmed the importance of driver visibility, and noted the absence of measurement procedures or objective criteria for reflection levels. The proposal is to add a footnote to clarify requirements for the driver’s forward field of vision, with future evaluation of whether more objective measurement provisions on reflections are needed.

Proposal to clarify that transparency requirements under UN R43 apply in both directions (exterior to interior and interior to exterior), addressing the growing use of privacy foils on windscreens and front side windows post-registration, which raises safety concerns regarding driver eye-contact, law enforcement visibility, and driving behaviour enforcement, consistent with the position expressed by GRSG at its 130th session.

Proposal to amend para. 8.2.1.1. to replace “Optional distortion” with “Optical distortion” in the table of tests for windscreens and glass panes. The amendment corrects the title of the optical distortion test listed in the table.

Proposal to amend para. 2.5.2. to change the lower vertical datum point from 5 above the horizontal to 4 above the horizontal, and amend Figure 3 to reflect this adjustment. The modification harmonizes the location of the lower datum point with the angle of obstruction requirement and resolves an inconsistency in UN Regulation No. 43.

Proposal to add footnote 1 to para. 6.2. defining transparency as requisite for the driver’s forward field of vision, for the driver to see and to be seen, and insert new para. 6.3. stating that safety glazing located in a position requisite for driving visibility may not be treated such that it limits or restricts the visibility of the driver from outside, for example by applying a mirror or chameleon effect, with minimum light transmittance provisions as described in Annex 24 applying from both directions.

Proposal to add footnote 1 to para. 6.2. to clarify that safety glazing materials must be sufficiently transparent as a requisite for the driver’s forward field of vision, for the driver to see and to be seen. The amendment aims to clarify possible safety concerns to ensure that the driver can be seen from outside and does not introduce new provisions but clarifies the intent of existing provisions.

Letter of support from the International Federation of Pedestrians and the European Cyclists Federation for the proposal for Supplement 14 to the 01 series of amendments to UN R43. The submission supports efforts to clarify regulations and ensure that windows within the driver’s forward field of vision meet minimum light-transmission requirements when viewed from both inside and outside the vehicle, and opposes treatments or tints that prevent people outside the vehicle from seeing the driver.

Report on a workshop organized by the Kingdom of the Netherlands on 25 August 2026 in Brussels to address transparency provisions in UN R43. The workshop discussed current transparency requirements, alternative test procedures for reflection, definitions such as chameleon effect, and amendments to working document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2026/20. Participants agreed transparency provisions are not direction-dependent, confirmed the importance of driver visibility, and noted the absence of measurement procedures or objective criteria for reflection levels. The proposal is to add a footnote to clarify requirements for the driver’s forward field of vision, with future evaluation of whether more objective measurement provisions on reflections are needed.

Proposal to clarify that transparency requirements under UN R43 apply in both directions (exterior to interior and interior to exterior), addressing the growing use of privacy foils on windscreens and front side windows post-registration, which raises safety concerns regarding driver eye-contact, law enforcement visibility, and driving behaviour enforcement, consistent with the position expressed by GRSG at its 130th session.

Proposal to amend para. 8.2.1.1. to replace “Optional distortion” with “Optical distortion” in the table of tests for windscreens and glass panes. The amendment corrects the title of the optical distortion test listed in the table.

Proposal to amend para. 2.5.2. to change the lower vertical datum point from 5 above the horizontal to 4 above the horizontal, and amend Figure 3 to reflect this adjustment. The modification harmonizes the location of the lower datum point with the angle of obstruction requirement and resolves an inconsistency in UN Regulation No. 43.

Proposal to add footnote 1 to para. 6.2. defining transparency as requisite for the driver’s forward field of vision, for the driver to see and to be seen, and insert new para. 6.3. stating that safety glazing located in a position requisite for driving visibility may not be treated such that it limits or restricts the visibility of the driver from outside, for example by applying a mirror or chameleon effect, with minimum light transmittance provisions as described in Annex 24 applying from both directions.

Proposal to add footnote 1 to para. 6.2. to clarify that safety glazing materials must be sufficiently transparent as a requisite for the driver’s forward field of vision, for the driver to see and to be seen. The amendment aims to clarify possible safety concerns to ensure that the driver can be seen from outside and does not introduce new provisions but clarifies the intent of existing provisions.

Letter of support from the International Federation of Pedestrians and the European Cyclists Federation for the proposal for Supplement 14 to the 01 series of amendments to UN R43. The submission supports efforts to clarify regulations and ensure that windows within the driver’s forward field of vision meet minimum light-transmission requirements when viewed from both inside and outside the vehicle, and opposes treatments or tints that prevent people outside the vehicle from seeing the driver.

Report on a workshop organized by the Kingdom of the Netherlands on 25 August 2026 in Brussels to address transparency provisions in UN R43. The workshop discussed current transparency requirements, alternative test procedures for reflection, definitions such as chameleon effect, and amendments to working document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2026/20. Participants agreed transparency provisions are not direction-dependent, confirmed the importance of driver visibility, and noted the absence of measurement procedures or objective criteria for reflection levels. The proposal is to add a footnote to clarify requirements for the driver’s forward field of vision, with future evaluation of whether more objective measurement provisions on reflections are needed.

Proposal to clarify that transparency requirements under UN R43 apply in both directions (exterior to interior and interior to exterior), addressing the growing use of privacy foils on windscreens and front side windows post-registration, which raises safety concerns regarding driver eye-contact, law enforcement visibility, and driving behaviour enforcement, consistent with the position expressed by GRSG at its 130th session.

Proposal to amend para. 8.2.1.1. to replace “Optional distortion” with “Optical distortion” in the table of tests for windscreens and glass panes. The amendment corrects the title of the optical distortion test listed in the table.

Proposal to amend para. 2.5.2. to change the lower vertical datum point from 5 above the horizontal to 4 above the horizontal, and amend Figure 3 to reflect this adjustment. The modification harmonizes the location of the lower datum point with the angle of obstruction requirement and resolves an inconsistency in UN Regulation No. 43.

Proposal to add footnote 1 to para. 6.2. defining transparency as requisite for the driver’s forward field of vision, for the driver to see and to be seen, and insert new para. 6.3. stating that safety glazing located in a position requisite for driving visibility may not be treated such that it limits or restricts the visibility of the driver from outside, for example by applying a mirror or chameleon effect, with minimum light transmittance provisions as described in Annex 24 applying from both directions.

Proposal to add footnote 1 to para. 6.2. to clarify that safety glazing materials must be sufficiently transparent as a requisite for the driver’s forward field of vision, for the driver to see and to be seen. The amendment aims to clarify possible safety concerns to ensure that the driver can be seen from outside and does not introduce new provisions but clarifies the intent of existing provisions.

Letter of support from the International Federation of Pedestrians and the European Cyclists Federation for the proposal for Supplement 14 to the 01 series of amendments to UN R43. The submission supports efforts to clarify regulations and ensure that windows within the driver’s forward field of vision meet minimum light-transmission requirements when viewed from both inside and outside the vehicle, and opposes treatments or tints that prevent people outside the vehicle from seeing the driver.

Report on a workshop organized by the Kingdom of the Netherlands on 25 August 2026 in Brussels to address transparency provisions in UN R43. The workshop discussed current transparency requirements, alternative test procedures for reflection, definitions such as chameleon effect, and amendments to working document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2026/20. Participants agreed transparency provisions are not direction-dependent, confirmed the importance of driver visibility, and noted the absence of measurement procedures or objective criteria for reflection levels. The proposal is to add a footnote to clarify requirements for the driver’s forward field of vision, with future evaluation of whether more objective measurement provisions on reflections are needed.

Proposal to clarify that transparency requirements under UN R43 apply in both directions (exterior to interior and interior to exterior), addressing the growing use of privacy foils on windscreens and front side windows post-registration, which raises safety concerns regarding driver eye-contact, law enforcement visibility, and driving behaviour enforcement, consistent with the position expressed by GRSG at its 130th session.

Proposal to amend para. 8.2.1.1. to replace “Optional distortion” with “Optical distortion” in the table of tests for windscreens and glass panes. The amendment corrects the title of the optical distortion test listed in the table.

Proposal to amend para. 2.5.2. to change the lower vertical datum point from 5 above the horizontal to 4 above the horizontal, and amend Figure 3 to reflect this adjustment. The modification harmonizes the location of the lower datum point with the angle of obstruction requirement and resolves an inconsistency in UN Regulation No. 43.

Proposal to add footnote 1 to para. 6.2. defining transparency as requisite for the driver’s forward field of vision, for the driver to see and to be seen, and insert new para. 6.3. stating that safety glazing located in a position requisite for driving visibility may not be treated such that it limits or restricts the visibility of the driver from outside, for example by applying a mirror or chameleon effect, with minimum light transmittance provisions as described in Annex 24 applying from both directions.

Proposal to add footnote 1 to para. 6.2. to clarify that safety glazing materials must be sufficiently transparent as a requisite for the driver’s forward field of vision, for the driver to see and to be seen. The amendment aims to clarify possible safety concerns to ensure that the driver can be seen from outside and does not introduce new provisions but clarifies the intent of existing provisions.

Letter of support from the International Federation of Pedestrians and the European Cyclists Federation for the proposal for Supplement 14 to the 01 series of amendments to UN R43. The submission supports efforts to clarify regulations and ensure that windows within the driver’s forward field of vision meet minimum light-transmission requirements when viewed from both inside and outside the vehicle, and opposes treatments or tints that prevent people outside the vehicle from seeing the driver.

Report on a workshop organized by the Kingdom of the Netherlands on 25 August 2026 in Brussels to address transparency provisions in UN R43. The workshop discussed current transparency requirements, alternative test procedures for reflection, definitions such as chameleon effect, and amendments to working document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2026/20. Participants agreed transparency provisions are not direction-dependent, confirmed the importance of driver visibility, and noted the absence of measurement procedures or objective criteria for reflection levels. The proposal is to add a footnote to clarify requirements for the driver’s forward field of vision, with future evaluation of whether more objective measurement provisions on reflections are needed.

Proposal to clarify that transparency requirements under UN R43 apply in both directions (exterior to interior and interior to exterior), addressing the growing use of privacy foils on windscreens and front side windows post-registration, which raises safety concerns regarding driver eye-contact, law enforcement visibility, and driving behaviour enforcement, consistent with the position expressed by GRSG at its 130th session.

Proposal to amend para. 8.2.1.1. to replace “Optional distortion” with “Optical distortion” in the table of tests for windscreens and glass panes. The amendment corrects the title of the optical distortion test listed in the table.

Proposal to amend para. 2.5.2. to change the lower vertical datum point from 5 above the horizontal to 4 above the horizontal, and amend Figure 3 to reflect this adjustment. The modification harmonizes the location of the lower datum point with the angle of obstruction requirement and resolves an inconsistency in UN Regulation No. 43.

Proposal to add footnote 1 to para. 6.2. defining transparency as requisite for the driver’s forward field of vision, for the driver to see and to be seen, and insert new para. 6.3. stating that safety glazing located in a position requisite for driving visibility may not be treated such that it limits or restricts the visibility of the driver from outside, for example by applying a mirror or chameleon effect, with minimum light transmittance provisions as described in Annex 24 applying from both directions.

Proposal to add footnote 1 to para. 6.2. to clarify that safety glazing materials must be sufficiently transparent as a requisite for the driver’s forward field of vision, for the driver to see and to be seen. The amendment aims to clarify possible safety concerns to ensure that the driver can be seen from outside and does not introduce new provisions but clarifies the intent of existing provisions.

Letter of support from the International Federation of Pedestrians and the European Cyclists Federation for the proposal for Supplement 14 to the 01 series of amendments to UN R43. The submission supports efforts to clarify regulations and ensure that windows within the driver’s forward field of vision meet minimum light-transmission requirements when viewed from both inside and outside the vehicle, and opposes treatments or tints that prevent people outside the vehicle from seeing the driver.

Report on a workshop organized by the Kingdom of the Netherlands on 25 August 2026 in Brussels to address transparency provisions in UN R43. The workshop discussed current transparency requirements, alternative test procedures for reflection, definitions such as chameleon effect, and amendments to working document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2026/20. Participants agreed transparency provisions are not direction-dependent, confirmed the importance of driver visibility, and noted the absence of measurement procedures or objective criteria for reflection levels. The proposal is to add a footnote to clarify requirements for the driver’s forward field of vision, with future evaluation of whether more objective measurement provisions on reflections are needed.

Proposal to clarify that transparency requirements under UN R43 apply in both directions (exterior to interior and interior to exterior), addressing the growing use of privacy foils on windscreens and front side windows post-registration, which raises safety concerns regarding driver eye-contact, law enforcement visibility, and driving behaviour enforcement, consistent with the position expressed by GRSG at its 130th session.

Proposal to amend para. 8.2.1.1. to replace “Optional distortion” with “Optical distortion” in the table of tests for windscreens and glass panes. The amendment corrects the title of the optical distortion test listed in the table.

Proposal to amend para. 2.5.2. to change the lower vertical datum point from 5 above the horizontal to 4 above the horizontal, and amend Figure 3 to reflect this adjustment. The modification harmonizes the location of the lower datum point with the angle of obstruction requirement and resolves an inconsistency in UN Regulation No. 43.

Proposal to add footnote 1 to para. 6.2. defining transparency as requisite for the driver’s forward field of vision, for the driver to see and to be seen, and insert new para. 6.3. stating that safety glazing located in a position requisite for driving visibility may not be treated such that it limits or restricts the visibility of the driver from outside, for example by applying a mirror or chameleon effect, with minimum light transmittance provisions as described in Annex 24 applying from both directions.

Proposal to add footnote 1 to para. 6.2. to clarify that safety glazing materials must be sufficiently transparent as a requisite for the driver’s forward field of vision, for the driver to see and to be seen. The amendment aims to clarify possible safety concerns to ensure that the driver can be seen from outside and does not introduce new provisions but clarifies the intent of existing provisions.

Letter of support from the International Federation of Pedestrians and the European Cyclists Federation for the proposal for Supplement 14 to the 01 series of amendments to UN R43. The submission supports efforts to clarify regulations and ensure that windows within the driver’s forward field of vision meet minimum light-transmission requirements when viewed from both inside and outside the vehicle, and opposes treatments or tints that prevent people outside the vehicle from seeing the driver.

Report on a workshop organized by the Kingdom of the Netherlands on 25 August 2026 in Brussels to address transparency provisions in UN R43. The workshop discussed current transparency requirements, alternative test procedures for reflection, definitions such as chameleon effect, and amendments to working document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2026/20. Participants agreed transparency provisions are not direction-dependent, confirmed the importance of driver visibility, and noted the absence of measurement procedures or objective criteria for reflection levels. The proposal is to add a footnote to clarify requirements for the driver’s forward field of vision, with future evaluation of whether more objective measurement provisions on reflections are needed.