Automatically Commanded Steering Functions
← ACSF 4
ACSF 6 →
20-22 Jan 2016  · Bonn
Agenda All Documents Informal Report
← Agenda Item 5.3. Agenda Item 5.3.2. →
5.3.1. FU1 Test

(F): explained their proposal for amendment
(D): agreed to the comments of F. Also the info from the manufacturer can be used, if a lead vehicle is necessary in the test and should be considered.
(UK, D, OICA, F) discussion about the special requirements for time (5 min) and the lateral acceleration (0,5m/s² – 90% ayvsmax)
(C-D): test should have clear requirements, that the Technical Service has guidance.
– Principle is ok
– We need different vehicle speeds (definition of the speeds is important)
– Tests should be able to be performed on the given test track
– Data which is missing should be provided by the vehicle manufacturer
(NL): it is more a functional demonstration, so the values are not so important
(OICA): do we really need 90% or would 75% be enough
(C-D): we should be sure, that the system performs until 100%, so we should leave the 90%
(EC): a lead vehicle should be considered in “lower” CATs
(D): this should be defined in the test requirements for these CATs, but CAT E should not need a lead vehicle

Homework:
D – define test with different test speeds
D + J – rewording