4.1 Updated document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2013/67/Rev.1

Document AECS-01-03 was presented by RUS.

OICA pointed out that the comments from Renault integrated in document AECS-01-03 should be disregarded, because they would be integrated in a further OICA document.

OICA was keen that RUS provides the justifications for the structure of their proposal.

RUS explained the 2-part structure as the devices and the installation of the devices. The annexes were too big to be included directly in the 1st draft.

OICA presented document AECS-01-04 focusing on the main points:

• Limited to M1
• 3-parts
• Significant number of comments are of technical nature.
• References to R10, R121
• Part 3 will be developed later, subject to the agreement of the informal group.

RUS agreed with the 3-part draft text.

OICA committed to prepare a revised text for the next meeting with the support from RUS.

Conclusion:

• Renault comments disregarded from document AECS-01-03
• OICA to produce a revised document, based on AECS-01-05, with support from RUS

4.2 Summary comments ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2013/67

RUS presented document AECS-01-06.

OICA committed to prepare a new document based on the revision 1 of the RUS document, incorporating the 3rd part, with fully justified comments.

OICA was also keen that RUS provides relevant justifications as well.

RUS agreed to start with M1/N1, with RUS working nationally on the other categories. RUS proposed that the group defines the priorities at this 1st kick-off meeting, and start in-depth discussions at the next meeting.

Conclusion:

• 2-step approach
• Step 1 focusing on M1/N1 category
• Step 2 focusing on the other categories
• OICA to prepare working document with proper justifications (see also conclusions under item 4.1.)
• RUS to provide input and justifications