| 1968 Vienna Convention on Road Traffic: OICA proposal for WP.1 and WP.29 consideration |
| Reference Number: WP.29-160-16 |
|
The requirement that “every driver shall at all times be able to control his vehicle” has recently given rise to discussions regarding the compatibility of the Convention with modern driver assistance systems. This proposal offers language to set parameters for the use of automated systems. |
| Submitted by: OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 160th WP.29 session (25-28 Jun 2013) |
| Document date: 05 Jun 13 |
| Relevant to: United Nations Agreement | 1968 Vienna Convention on Road Traffic |
| Click here to view the full document file |
| Consistency between the Convention on Road Traffic (1968) and Vehicle Technical Regulations |
| Reference Number: WP.29-160-31 |
|
German proposals for revision of the Vienna Convention to address the rise of automated driver assistance systems which currently would conflict with ‘driver always in control of the vehicle’ provisions. |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 160th WP.29 session (25-28 Jun 2013) |
| Document date: 24 Jun 13 |
| Relevant to: United Nations Agreement | 1968 Vienna Convention on Road Traffic |
| Click here to view the full document file |
| Consistency between the Convention on Road Traffic (1968) and Vehicle Technical Regulations |
| Reference Number: WP.29-160-32 |
|
WP.1 document, prepared by Belgium, France, Italy, Sweden, and the United States transmitted to WP.29 by Germany, proposing revisions to the Vienna Convention in order to address the rise in automated driver assistance systems. |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 160th WP.29 session (25-28 Jun 2013) |
| Document date: 24 Jun 13 |
| Relevant to: United Nations Agreement | 1968 Vienna Convention on Road Traffic |
| Click here to view the full document file |
No matching documents.
No matching documents.
No matching agenda items.