| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document Title | Phase-specific calculation for PEV range (revised) | ||||||||
| Reference Number | WLTP-SG-EV-06-03/Rev.1 | ||||||||
| Date |
10 Nov 2014
|
||||||||
| Source(s) | ACEA | ||||||||
| Rulemaking Area(s) | Electric Vehicles & the Environment and GTR No. 15 WLTP | ||||||||
| Meeting(s) | |||||||||
| Downloads | |||||||||
| UNECE server | .pdf format | ||||||||
| Excerpts from session reports related to this document | |||||||||
| WLTP-SG-EV | WLTP-SG-EV Session 6 | 17 Nov 2014 |
ACEA presents the results concerning out a calculation of phase specific range values for PEV. If such values are available, there is no need for WLTCcity anymore. Comparison between simulation and calculation shows small deviation for both a vehicle that can follow the cycle and for a vehicle that cannot follow the cycle. Japan can accept the procedure, but will need to investigate how effect shorten test procedure. EC is of the opinion that there is a need for more validation from testing. Japan has test data that can be shown until WLTP IWG #9. Sub group EV agrees on the principal of calculation of phase specific values. The need for phase specific values is a discussion on political level between EC and Japan. EC does not need phase specific values, but accepts that Japan request them. Conclusion: |
||||||||