1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Document Title Proposal for amendments to document WP.29/2011/107
Reference Number WP.29-155-04
Date
22 Oct 2011
Rulemaking Area(s) UN R58 Rear Underrun Protection Devices
Meeting(s)
Downloads
UNECE server .pdf format
Excerpts from session reports related to this document
WP.29 | Session 155 | 15-18 Nov 2011

57. Agenda item 4.7.2, UN Regulation No. 58, document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2011/107,

Paragraph 2.3., correct to read

“2.3. Any vehicle in one of the categories M1, M2, M3, N1, O1 or O2 shall be deemed …

  • Where there is more than one rear axle, the width to be considered is that of the widest.
  • The requirements of paragraphs 2.3.(b) and 2.3.(c) above shall be satisfied at least on a line:
  • (i) At a distance of not more than 450 mm from the rear extremity of the vehicle;
  • (ii) That may have interruptions totalling not more than 200 mm."

Paragraph 24.1., correct to read:

“24.1. If the vehicle submitted for approval pursuant to this Regulation meets the
requirements of paragraph 2.3.(b) or paragraph 2.3.(c) or paragraph 25 and has been tested following the conditions set out in paragraph 2.2., approval of that vehicle type shall be granted.”

Paragraph 31.5., correct to read:

“31.5. As from 48 months …

  • (a) … meets the requirements of paragraph 2.3.(b) or paragraph 2.3.(c) or Part III of this Regulation as amended by the 02 series of amendments;
  • (b) ….the requirements of paragraph 2.3.(b) or paragraph 2.3.(c) or Part III of this Regulation as amended by the 02 series of amendments.
    …."

Annex 3, correct to read:

"Annex 3


….
of a type of a vehicle with regard to its rear underrun protection (RUP) pursuant to paragraph 2.3.(b) / paragraph 2.3.(c)/ Part III 2/ of Regulation No. 58.

_____________

2/ Strike out what does not apply."