Proposal from the task force co-chairs to support development of consensus.
| Regarding: |
| Meeting(s): |
|
||||
| Document Title: UN R79: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2021/10 |
| Document Reference Number: GRVA-10-22 |
|
Description: Proposal for amendments to the proposal to allow up to seven seconds between the start of the lane change procedure and the start of the lane change manoeuvre. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA and OICA |
| Meeting Session: 10th GRVA session (25-28 May 2021) |
| Document date: 21 May 21 (Posted 25 May 21) |
| Document status: Formal GR review |
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 79 | Steering Equipment.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
| Document Title: UN R79: Proposal for a supplement to the 03 series of amendments |
| Document Reference Number: GRVA/2021/10 |
|
Description: Proposal to allow up to seven seconds to start and perform a lane change. |
| Submitted by: AVERE |
| Meeting Session: 9th GRVA session (1-5 Feb 2021) |
| Document date: 20 Nov 20 (Posted 28 Nov 20) |
| Document status: Formal GR review |
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 79 | Steering Equipment.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
| Meeting Reports |
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 9 | 1-5
Feb 2021
50. The expert from AVERE introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2021/10 proposing revised amendments to the ACSF of Category C provisions (time range during which the lane change manoeuvre is initiated) in UN Regulation No. 79. The experts from UK, European Commissions and Japan supported the proposal. The expert from Korea supported the proposal and indicated that a longer time than the one proposed would be preferable. The expert from the Netherlands opposed to the proposal for the same reasons as the one expressed in September 2020. The expert from Norway also opposed to the proposal. He wondered about the possible benefits of stretching the limits. The expert from France supported the proposal but pointed out inconsistencies in the drawing compared to the provisions in the text. The expert from OICA supported the proposal. The expert from AVERE provided answers to the statements and questions raised. The Chair asked if all doubts were cleared. The experts from the Netherlands, Sweden, Germany and Finland still had reservations to the proposal but agreed that it could be further discussed at a task force meeting. 72. GRVA noted that the review of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2021/9, ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2021/10 and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2021/11 by the Task Force on ADAS was still ongoing. The expert from AVERE withdrew ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2021/7. |