1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Document Title | Proposal for an Appendix 1 to Annex 4 to the draft UN Regulation on ALKS | ||||||||
Reference Number | GRVA-06-09 | ||||||||
Date |
2 Mar 2020
|
||||||||
Summary | Proposal for an "Appendix on Traffic Disturbance Critical Scenarios to the Annex on audit/assessment to the new UN Regulation on Automated Lane Keeping systems (ALKS)" applying concepts under consideration by the VMAD informal group to establish performance criteria based on "driver model" responses to traffic scenarios. | ||||||||
Rulemaking Area(s) | UN R157 Automated Lane-Keeping Systems and Automated Driving | ||||||||
Proposal Status | Informal GR review | ||||||||
Meeting(s) | |||||||||
Related Documents | |||||||||
GRVA-06-02 | ALKS: Updated proposal for a new UN Regulation on Automated Lane Keeping Function (superseded) | ||||||||
Downloads | |||||||||
UNECE server | .pdf format | .docx format | |||||||
Excerpts from session reports related to this document | |||||||||
GRVA | Session 6 | 3-4 Mar 2020 |
7. GRVA reviewed in detail GRVA-06-02 prepared by the ACSF group for consideration at this session. 8. GRVA reviewed the scope of the proposed Regulation, discussed a number of items such as the alignment of definitions with existing standards, whether or not the Software Indentification Number (RxSWIN) mechanism in the draft UN Regulation on Software Updates and Software Update Management Systems should be implemented on a mandatory basis. 10. GRVA discussed about the best way to incorporate the Appendix prepared by the IWG on Validation Methods for Automated Driving (GRVA-06-09). GRVA noted the work on this Appendix was based on data collected in Japan and Northern America but that no data from Europe could be used. The expert from the Russian Federation expressed concerns about the implementation of the provisions in this Appendix. Some delegations expressed doubts about the values proposed in square bracket, whether they would be representative for their market. 24. The Chair regretted that GRVA did not have enough time for reviewing the proposal submitted by the expert from AVERE and also for the proposal submitted by the expert from the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. GRVA agreed to consider these two items at its September 2020 session. |
||||||||