Show admin view
UN R79: Proposal for amendments to GRVA/2019/8 (RCM)
Document GRVA-02-08
14 January 2019

Proposal to

  1. correct numbering of paragraph 2.3.4.18.
  2. limit the initial scope to M1 and N1 vehicles
  3. further modify the numbering to clarify that remote-controlled maneuvering (RCM) is not a form of ACSF
  4. clarify that all RCM are subject to the requirements of the Electronics Annex (Annex 6 to UN R79).

Submitted by UK
Status: Superseded
Download document
Previous Documents, Discussions, and Outcomes
6. (a) | Automatically Commanded Steering Function
6. (c) | Remote Control Manoeuvring

41. The expert from UK introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/21 with provisions on Remote Control Manoeuvring. GRVA recalled that it had already adopted provisions on a majority basis during its second session but had agreed to review them at this session to seek full consensus. The expert introduced GRVA-04-19 with further amendments introducing clarifications.

42. The expert from Germany requested that the session report reflect their statement: “Germany does not see the necessity to regulate this function at UNECE level”. Other experts mentioned that similar provisions could be developed for heavy duty vehicles, too.

43. GRVA agreed to work on similar provisions for other vehicle categories. GRVA also agreed with the amendments to the submitted proposal, reproduced in GRVA-04-19. GRVA requested the secretariat to submit the latest version of the proposal to WP.29 and AC.1 for review and vote at their November 2019 session.

5. (d) | Automatically Commanded Steering Function
9. | UN Regulation No. 79

56. The expert from UK introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/8 and
GRVA-02-08 amending it, proposing to insert technical prescriptions on Remote Control Manoeuvring (RCM) which were systems that were already installed on vehicles without being regulated to date. The expert from Germany did not support the proposal and suggested to insert one sentence in the Regulation that would forbid RCM in vehicles of category M1 and N1. The expert from OICA explained that such system already existed for vehicles of category M1G and that there would be future applications such as reverse assistant for trailers that would bring quantifiable benefits in terms of safety. Following comments and input from the experts from Australia, France and Sweden, the Chair asked GRVA whether the status quo would be acceptable, i.e. do Contracting Parties accept that such systems are permitted and do not require recognition by Regulation. The expert from the Russian Federation summed-up the discussion and suggested to adopt the proposal. GRVA adopted the proposal as amended (Annex VII). GRVA requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration and vote at their November 2019 session. GRVA unanimously agreed with this delayed submission until the November 2019, so that the dissent from the experts from Germany and the Netherlands could be considered again during the September 2019 session of GRVA, in view of reaching a broader consensus.

Related and Previous Documents
GRVA/2019/8
GRVA/2019/21
WP.29/2019/114
Relates to UN R79 |