| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document Title | Proposal for Supplement 7 to the 01 series of amendments to Regulation No. 112 | ||||||||
| Reference Number | GRE/2016/18 | ||||||||
| Date |
22 Jan 2016
|
||||||||
| Summary | Proposal to introduce a new optional “Class B1” headlamp. The proposal would establish photometric requirements for Class B1 based on average real performance of present Class B (halogen/LED) but would not include additional design restrictions such as the luminous flux of light source. | ||||||||
| Source(s) | Poland | ||||||||
| Rulemaking Area(s) | UN R112 Asymmetrical Beam Headlamps | ||||||||
| Meeting(s) | |||||||||
| Related Documents | |||||||||
| GRE-74-11 | Proposal for a Supplement to the 01 series of amendments to Regulation No. 112 (superseded) | ||||||||
| GRE-76-21 | Analysis of the Polish proposal ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRE/2016/18 | ||||||||
| GRE-76-26 | Explanations to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRE/2016/18 | ||||||||
| SLR-25-05 | UN R112: Poland comments on CLEPA analysis of GRE/2016/18 | ||||||||
| Downloads | |||||||||
| UNECE server | .pdf format | .doc format | |||||||
| Excerpts from session reports related to this document | |||||||||
| GRE | Session 75 | 5-8 Apr 2016 |
46. The expert from Poland proposed to introduce a new optional “Class B1” headlamp (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRE/2016/18). The proposal received remarks from the experts of Germany, Netherlands, UK, CLEPA, GTB and OICA. Some experts pointed out that they would need more time to study the proposal and that it could be considered by IWG SLR when developing performance-based requirements in the future (para. 9 (d) above). GRE invited all experts to send their comments to the expert from Poland and decided to keep this issue on the agenda of the next session. |
||||||||