| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document Title | Analysis of the Polish proposal ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRE/2016/18 | ||||||||
| Reference Number | GRE-76-21 | ||||||||
| Date |
25 Oct 2016
|
||||||||
| Summary | Analysis raising concerns regarding the proposal to establish photometric requirements for Class B1 based on average real performance of present Class B (halogen/LED) without reference to design specifications such as the luminous flux of light source. | ||||||||
| Source(s) | CLEPA | ||||||||
| Rulemaking Area(s) | UN R112 Asymmetrical Beam Headlamps | ||||||||
| Meeting(s) | |||||||||
| Related Documents | |||||||||
| GRE/2016/18 | Proposal for Supplement 7 to the 01 series of amendments to Regulation No. 112 | ||||||||
| SLR-25-05 | UN R112: Poland comments on CLEPA analysis of GRE/2016/18 | ||||||||
| Downloads | |||||||||
| UNECE server | .pdf format | .pptx format | |||||||
| Excerpts from session reports related to this document | |||||||||
| GRE | Session 76 | 25-28 Oct 2016 |
29. The expert from Poland introduced a slightly revised proposal for a new optional ‘Class B1’ headlamp (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRE/2016/18 and GRE-76-26). The expert of CLEPA expressed a number of concerns over the proposal and pointed out that more time would be needed to analyse it in detail. The expert of IEC pointed out that the proposed measurement procedures should be clarified and that the proposal could benefit from editorial improvements. The expert of SAE supported the performance-based approach of the Polish proposal and offered to work with the expert from Poland on alternative requirements and evaluation methods for headlamps. GRE agreed that this issue should be dealt with by IWG SLR (stage 2 of the simplification process to introduce technologically-neutral and performance-based requirements), possibly through the establishment of a task force. |
||||||||