| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document Title | European Commission draft of the motorcycle OBD GTR | ||||||||
| Reference Number | EPPR-14-06 | ||||||||
| Date |
9 Dec 2015
|
||||||||
| Summary | Updated version of the draft GTR on motorcycle emissions OBD prepared for the EPPR informal group by the European Commission. | ||||||||
| Source(s) | EC | ||||||||
| Rulemaking Area(s) | GTR No. 18 L-OBD | ||||||||
| Proposal Status | Superseded | ||||||||
| Meeting(s) | |||||||||
| Related Documents | |||||||||
| EPPR-10-17 | Working draft of the proposed GTR on motorcycle on-board diagnostics (OBD): version 2 (superseded) | ||||||||
| EPPR-14-14 | Japan comments on the latest EC draft of the motorcycle OBD GTR | ||||||||
| EPPR-15-05 | India comments on the EC draft of the motorcycle OBD global technical regulation | ||||||||
| EPPR-15-06 | IMMA proposal for connector specification under the draft motorcycle OBD GTR | ||||||||
| EPPR-15-14 | IMMA response to India's comments on the EC draft of the motorcycle OBD global technical regulation | ||||||||
| GRPE/2016/13 | Proposal for a new global technical regulation on the measurement procedure for two- or three-wheeled motor vehicles with regard to on-board diagnostics (superseded) | ||||||||
| Downloads | |||||||||
| UNECE server | .doc format | ||||||||
| Excerpts from session reports related to this document | |||||||||
| EPPR | Session 14 | 12 Jan 2016 |
Background Afterwards, the EC prepared a new proposal (EPPR-14-06), which differs from the previous one both in terms of contents and layout. It was published on 08.12.2016 but not discussed during the EPPR telco of December, since such meeting focussed on EVAP only. It was taken as new version of draft OBD GTR: version No.5 Japan inserted their comments on EPPR-14-06. Discussion EPPR-14-06 was presented by Japan. EC thanked Japan and asked to add the definition of default mode in their proposal. Japan agreed to provide such definition at the next meeting. Mr Nakhawa/India requested for a study reservation, especially on issues like repair information, assessment of OBD, items relating to intellectual property which are going to be submitted to authorities. As requested by the Chair, stakeholders were invited to send written comments by Friday 05.02.2016, in good time for a fruitful discussion at the next telephone conference early February. India asked for a clarification on pag.28 and deemed that there was no justification for the proposal on Grade A. |
||||||||